Research Spotlight

Posted August 15th 2018

Cardiac Metaplasia: Follow, Treat, or Ignore?

Stuart Spechler M.D.

Stuart Spechler M.D.

Spechler, S. J. (2018). “Cardiac Metaplasia: Follow, Treat, or Ignore?” Dig Dis Sci 63(8): 2052-2058.

Full text of this article.

Over the past two decades, evidence has accumulated to challenge the traditional view that cardiac mucosa, which is comprised exclusively of mucus glands, is the normal lining of the most proximal portion of the stomach (the gastric cardia). There is now considerable evidence to suggest that cardiac mucosa develops as a GERD-induced, squamous-to-columnar esophageal metaplasia in some, if not all, cases. Although cardiac mucosa lacks the goblet cells commonly required for a histologic diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia, cardiac mucosa has many molecular features of an intestinal-type mucosa, and appears to be the precursor of intestinal metaplasia with goblet cells. In apparently normal individuals, cardiac mucosa is commonly found in a narrow band, less than 3 mm in extent, on the columnar side of the squamo-columnar junction at the end of the esophagus. A greater extent of cardiac mucosa can be found in GERD patients, and the magnitude of that extent appears to be an index of GERD severity. Presently, the risk of adenocarcinoma imposed by cardiac mucosa is not clear, but appears to be far less than that of intestinal metaplasis with goblet cells. The British Society of Gastroenterology accepts an esophagus lined by cardiac mucosa as a “Barrett’s esophagus”. However, if one defines Barrett’s esophagus as a metaplasia that predisposes to cancer, then only intestinal metaplasia clearly fulfills that criterion at this time. Well-designed, prospective studies are needed to establish the malignant potential of cardiac mucosa.


Posted August 15th 2018

Physical activity intensity of patient’s with traumatic brain injury during inpatient rehabilitation.

Simon Driver Ph.D.

Simon Driver Ph.D.

Ramsey, J., S. Driver, C. Swank, M. Bennett and R. Dubiel (2018). “Physical activity intensity of patient’s with traumatic brain injury during inpatient rehabilitation.” Brain Inj Jul 23. [Epub ahead of print]: 1-7.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVE: Use actigraphy to (1) describe the intensity of physical activity completed by patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) during inpatient rehabilitation, and (2) examine the association between physical activity intensity and demographic, injury, and programmatic characteristics. DESIGN: Observational. METHOD: Fifty individuals with TBI undergoing inpatient rehabilitation wore accelerometers for an average of 8.7 +/- 1.8 days to capture physical activity intensity that was summarized using activity counts (ACs). Intensity of activity was described for categories of the participant’s day including physical and occupational therapy, non-active therapy, recreation, and sleep. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlations, and general linear regression were computed. RESULTS: Participants average physical activity intensity was considered “inactive” during physical (M = 242.7.7 +/- 105.2 AC/min) and occupational therapy (M = 244 +/- 105), non-active therapy (M = 142.2 +/- 74.1), and recreation (M = 112.8 +/- 59.5), and “sedentary” during sleep (M = 26.7 +/- 14.8). Significant positive associations were identified between physical activity intensity and categories of the participant’s day suggesting that participants who complete more intense activity in therapy also complete more intense activity during non-active therapy and recreation time. General linear regression indicated that age significantly predicted physical activity intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate that patients with TBI undergoing inpatient rehabilitation are largely inactive or sedentary. Strategies to promote a safe increase in physical activity intensity are required if cardiovascular conditioning is to be improved during inpatient rehabilitation.


Posted August 15th 2018

Impact of Aortic Root Anatomy and Geometry on Paravalvular Leak in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Extremely Large Annuli Using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Valve.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Tang, G. H. L., S. Zaid, I. George, O. K. Khalique, Y. Abramowitz, Y. Maeno, R. R. Makkar, H. Jilaihawi, N. Kamioka, V. H. Thourani, V. Babaliaros, J. G. Webb, N. M. Htun, A. Attinger-Toller, H. Ahmad, R. Kaple, K. Sharma, J. A. Kozina, T. Kaneko, P. Shah, S. A. Hirji, N. D. Desai, S. Anwaruddin, D. Jagasia, H. C. Herrmann, S. S. Basra, M. A. Szerlip, M. J. Mack, M. Mathur, C. W. Tan, C. W. Don, R. Sharma, S. Gafoor, M. Zhang, S. R. Kapadia, S. L. Mick, A. Krishnaswamy, N. Amoroso, A. Salemi, S. C. Wong, A. S. Kini, J. Rodes-Cabau, M. B. Leon and S. K. Kodali (2018). “Impact of Aortic Root Anatomy and Geometry on Paravalvular Leak in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Extremely Large Annuli Using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Valve.” JACC Cardiovasc Interv 11(14): 1377-1387.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine factors affecting paravalvular leak (PVL) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Edwards SAPIEN 3 (S3) valve in extremely large annuli. BACKGROUND: The largest recommended annular area for the 29-mm S3 is 683 mm(2). However, experience with S3 TAVR in annuli >683 mm(2) has not been widely reported. METHODS: From December 2013 to July 2017, 74 patients across 16 centers with mean area 721 +/- 38 mm(2) (range: 684 to 852 mm(2)) underwent S3 TAVR. The transfemoral approach was used in 95%, and 39% were under conscious sedation. Patient, anatomic, and procedural characteristics were retrospectively analyzed. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 outcomes were reported. RESULTS: Procedural success was 100%, with 2 deaths, 1 stroke, and 2 major vascular complications at 30 days. Post-dilatation occurred in 32%, with final balloon overfilling (1 to 5 ml extra) in 70% of patients. Implantation depth averaged 22.3 +/- 12.4% at the noncoronary cusp and 20.7 +/- 9.9% at the left coronary cusp. New left bundle branch block occurred in 17%, and 6.3% required new permanent pacemakers. Thirty-day echocardiography showed mild PVL in 22.3%, 6.9% moderate, and none severe. There was no annular rupture or coronary obstruction. Mild or greater PVL was associated with larger maximum annular and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameters, larger LVOT area and perimeter, LVOT area greater than annular area, and higher annular eccentricity. CONCLUSIONS: TAVR with the 29-mm S3 valve beyond the recommended range by overexpansion is safe, with acceptable PVL and pacemaker rates. Larger LVOTs and more eccentric annuli were associated with more PVL. Longer term follow-up will be needed to determine durability of S3 TAVR in this population.


Posted August 15th 2018

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement of Failed Surgically Implanted Bioprostheses: The STS/ACC Registry.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Tuzcu, E. M., S. R. Kapadia, S. Vemulapalli, J. D. Carroll, D. R. Holmes, Jr., M. J. Mack, V. H. Thourani, F. L. Grover, J. M. Brennan, R. M. Suri, D. Dai and L. G. Svensson (2018). “Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement of Failed Surgically Implanted Bioprostheses: The STS/ACC Registry.” J Am Coll Cardiol 72(4): 370-382.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown to be feasible, yet the safety and efficacy in relation to native valve (NV) TAVR are not known. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ViV TAVR for failed surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) by comparing it with the benchmark of NV TAVR. METHODS: Patients who underwent ViV-TAVR (n = 1,150) were matched 1:2 (on sex, high or extreme risk, hostile chest or porcelain aorta, 5-m-walk time, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality for reoperation) to patients undergoing NV-TAVR (n = 2,259). Baseline characteristics, procedural data, and in-hospital outcomes were obtained from the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. The 30-day and 1-year outcomes were obtained from linked Medicare administrative claims data. RESULTS: Unadjusted analysis revealed lower 30-day mortality (2.9% vs. 4.8%; p < 0.001), stroke (1.7% vs. 3.0%; p = 0.003), and heart failure hospitalizations (2.4% vs. 4.6%; p < 0.001) in the ViV-TAVR compared with NV-TAVR group. Adjusted analysis revealed lower 30-day mortality (hazard ratio: 0.503; 95% confidence interval: 0.302 to 0.839; p = 0.008), lower 1-year mortality (hazard ratio: 0.653; 95% confidence interval: 0.505 to 0.844; p = 0.001), and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio: 0.685; 95% confidence interval: 0.500 to 0.939; p = 0.019) in the ViV-TAVR group. Patients in the ViV-TAVR group had higher post-TAVR mean gradient (16 vs. 9 mm Hg; p < 0.001), but less moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (3.5% vs. 6.6%; p < 0.001). Post-TAVR gradients were highest in small SAVRs and stenotic SAVRs. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison with the benchmark NV-TAVR shows ViV-TAVR to be a safe and effective procedure in patients with failed SAVR who are at high risk for repeat surgery.


Posted August 15th 2018

Variation in post-TAVR antiplatelet therapy utilization and associated outcomes: Insights from the STS/ACC TVT Registry.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Sherwood, M. W., S. Vemulapalli, J. K. Harrison, D. Dai, A. N. Vora, M. J. Mack, D. R. Holmes, J. S. Rumsfeld, D. J. Cohen, V. H. Thourani, A. Kirtane and E. D. Peterson (2018). “Variation in post-TAVR antiplatelet therapy utilization and associated outcomes: Insights from the STS/ACC TVT Registry.” Am Heart J 204: 9-16.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); however, the optimal antiplatelet strategy is undefined, and little is known about practice patterns. We aimed to describe contemporary practice patterns of antiplatelet therapy and their relationship to outcomes post-TAVR. METHODS: The population was derived from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry with Center for Medical Services linkage for 1-year outcomes from October 1, 2011 to June 30,2016. The primary outcome measured was DAPT use in patients without anticoagulation. Secondary outcomes included death, major bleeding, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke at 1year. RESULTS: Overall, 16,694 patients underwent transfemoral TAVR at 444 hospitals and were discharged without anticoagulation. Among these, 13,546 (81.1%) patients were discharged on DAPT, whereas 3,148 patients (18.9%) were discharged on monotherapy. Patients discharged on DAPT versus monotherapy were similar in age, sex, and most comorbid illnesses but had higher rates of coronary artery disease (64.6% vs 52.3%; P<.01) and peripheral artery disease (25.2% vs 22.3%; P<.01). Hospital prescribing patterns varied significantly (median frequency of DAPT 85.7%, interquartile range 94.1%-74.2%). DAPT (vs monotherapy) patients had a similar mortality risk at 1year (adjusted hazard ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.81-1.05), significantly higher risk for major bleeding (1.48, 1.10-1.99), and similar hazard for stroke (1.04, 0.83-1.31) and MI (1.00, 0.72-1.39). CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, most patients were discharged on DAPT following TAVR. Practice patterns varied significantly among hospitals. Patients discharged with DAPT had a similar adjusted risk of mortality, stroke, and MI compared to antiplatelet monotherapy, although risk for bleeding was significantly higher. Future investigation is needed to define the optimal antiplatelet therapy for patients undergoing TAVR.