The Killer Immunoglobulin-Like Receptor Dilemma: How Do We Harness the Power of Killer Immunoglobulin-like Receptors?

Medhat Z. Askar M.D.
Askar, M. (2017). “The killer immunoglobulin-like receptor dilemma: How do we harness the power of killer immunoglobulin-like receptors?” Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 23(4): 535-536.
Alloreactive natural killer (NK) cells have been reported to significantly impact allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes. How the interactions between killer immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) and HLA influence human NK cell functions has been demonstrated by elegant in vitro experiments [1]. Since the early 2000s, the published literature has been populated with numerous studies investigating the association between KIR genotype/haplotype and clinical outcomes of HCT, both independently and in the context of interaction with corresponding HLA ligands. Meanwhile, additional models for KIR modulation of NK cell functions have been proposed [2]. The method of KIR typing adds another layer of complexity in studying the associations between KIR and HCT outcomes. Most published studies in this domain rely on logistically attractive genotyping methods that allow identification of all KIR genes from archived DNA samples collected routinely for HLA typing and typically tested in large batches. In contrast, flow cytometry–based phenotyping and RNA-based transcription profile testing require freshly collected samples and are more technically involved. Leung et al. have demonstrated significant heterogeneity in the level of KIR expression by NK cells with more than 10-fold difference observed among individuals with similar genotype; they have also demonstrated that transcripts of only 2 of 12 KIR genes tested (KIR2DL3 and KIR3DL2) were consistently detectable by real time PCR [3]. These results suggest the potential relevance of phenotyping, rather than genotyping, in KIR-based selection of HCT donors. Lastly, different alleles of a KIR gene were reported to have different functional properties, such as licensing capability, durability of surface expression after ligand interaction, and intracellular signaling [4].