Cardiology

Packer, M. (2019). “Drugs That Ameliorate Epicardial Adipose Tissue Inflammation May Have Discordant Effects in Heart Failure With a Preserved Ejection Fraction as Compared With a Reduced Ejection Fraction.” J Card Fail Sep 18. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

Heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have distinctive pathophysiologies, and thus, therapeutic approaches to the 2 disorders should differ. Neurohormonal activation drives the progression of HFrEF, and neurohormonal antagonists are highly effective in HFrEF, but not in HFpEF. Conversely, a broad range of chronic systemic inflammatory or metabolic disorders cause an expansion and inflammation of epicardial adipose tissue; the secretion of adipocytokines may lead to microvascular dysfunction and fibrosis of the underlying myocardium, which (if the left atrium is affected) may lead to atrial fibrillation (AF) and (if the left ventricle is affected) may lead to HFpEF. Anti-inflammatory drugs (such as statins and anticytokine agents) can ameliorate epicardial adipose tissue dysfunction. Statins appear to ameliorate the development of atrial myopathy (both experimentally and clinically), and in randomized controlled trials, they reduce the incidence of new-onset and recurrent AF and decrease the risk of heart failure with the features of HFpEF; yet, they have no benefits in HFrEF. Similarly, anticytokine agents appear to prevent heart failure in patients with or prone to HFpEF, but adversely affect HFrEF. Several antihyperglycemic agents also reduce epicardial fat mass and inflammation, but this benefit may be offset by additional actions to cause sodium retention and neurohormonal activation. Thiazolidinediones have favorable effects on experimental AF and HFpEF, but their antinatriuretic actions negate these benefits, and they worsen the clinical course of HFrEF. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists also ameliorate AF and HFpEF in laboratory models, but their positive inotropic and chronotropic effects may be deleterious in HFrEF. By contrast, metformin and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors alleviate epicardial adipose tissue dysfunction and may reduce the risk of AF and HFpEF; yet, they may have additional actions to promote cardiomyocyte survival that are useful in HFrEF. The concordance of the benefits of anti-inflammatory and antihyperglycemic drugs on AF and HFpEF (but not on HFrEF) supports the paradigm that epicardial adipose tissue is a central pathogenetic mechanism and therapeutic target for both AF and HFpEF in patients with chronic systemic inflammatory or metabolic diseases.

Packer, M. (2019). “Disease-Treatment Interactions in the Management of Patients with Obesity and Diabetes Who Have Atrial Fibrillation: The Potential Mediating Influence of Epicardial Adipose Tissue.” Cardiovasc Diabetol 18(1): 121.

Full text of this article.

Both obesity and type 2 diabetes are important risk factors for atrial fibrillation (AF), possibly because they both cause an expansion of epicardial adipose tissue, which is the source of proinflammatory adipocytokines that can lead to microvascular dysfunction and fibrosis of the underlying myocardium. If the derangement of epicardial fat adjoins the left atrium, the result is an atrial myopathy, which is clinically manifest as AF. In patients with AF, there is a close relationship between epicardial fat volume and the severity of electrophysiological abnormalities in the adjacent myocardial tissues, and epicardial fat mass predicts AF in the general population. The expansion of epicardial adipose tissue in obesity and type 2 diabetes may also affect the left ventricle, impairing its distensibility and leading to heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Patients with obesity or type 2 diabetes with AF often have HFpEF, but the diagnosis may be missed, if dyspnea is attributed to increased body mass or to the arrhythmia. The expected response to the treatment for obesity, diabetes or AF may be influenced by their effects on epicardial inflammation and the underlying atrial and ventricular myopathy. Bariatric surgery and metformin reduce epicardial fat mass and ameliorate AF, whereas insulin promotes adipogenesis and cardiac fibrosis, and its use is accompanied by an increased risk of AF. Rate control strategies for AF may impair exercise tolerance, because they allow for greater time for ventricular filling in patients who cannot tolerate volume loading because of cardiac fibrosis and HFpEF. At the same time, both obesity and diabetes decrease the expected success rate of rhythm control strategies for AF (e.g., electrical cardioversion or catheter ablation), because increased epicardial adipose tissue volumes and cardiac fibrosis are important determinants of AF recurrence following these procedures.

Khush, K. K., J. Patel, S. Pinney, A. Kao, R. Alharethi, E. DePasquale, G. Ewald, P. Berman, M. Kanwar, D. Hiller, J. P. Yee, R. N. Woodward, S. Hall and J. Kobashigawa (2019). “Noninvasive Detection of Graft Injury after Heart Transplant Using Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA: A Prospective Multicenter Study.” Am J Transplant 19(10): 2889-2899.

Full text of this article.

Standardized donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) testing has been introduced into clinical use to monitor kidney transplant recipients for rejection. This report describes the performance of this dd-cfDNA assay to detect allograft rejection in samples from heart transplant (HT) recipients undergoing surveillance monitoring across the United States. Venous blood was longitudinally sampled from 740 HT recipients from 26 centers and in a single-center cohort of 33 patients at high risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Plasma dd-cfDNA was quantified by using targeted amplification and sequencing of a single nucleotide polymorphism panel. The dd-cfDNA levels were correlated to paired events of biopsy-based diagnosis of rejection. The median dd-cfDNA was 0.07% in reference HT recipients (2164 samples) and 0.17% in samples classified as acute rejection (35 samples; P = .005). At a 0.2% threshold, dd-cfDNA had a 44% sensitivity to detect rejection and a 97% negative predictive value. In the cohort at risk for AMR (11 samples), dd-cfDNA levels were elevated 3-fold in AMR compared with patients without AMR (99 samples, P = .004). The standardized dd-cfDNA test identified acute rejection in samples from a broad population of HT recipients. The reported test performance characteristics will guide the next stage of clinical utility studies of the dd-cfDNA assay.

Crow, L. D., A. Jambusaria-Pahlajani, C. L. Chung, D. A. Baran, S. E. Lowenstein, M. Abdelmalek, R. L. Ahmed, M. J. Anadkat, S. M. Arcasoy, D. Berg, K. P. Bibee, E. Billingsley, W. H. Black, T. W. Blalock, M. Bleicher, D. C. Brennan, D. G. Brodland, M. R. Brown, B. T. Carroll, J. A. Carucci, T. W. Chang, G. Chaux, C. A. Cusack, D. F. Dilling, A. Doyle, A. M. Emtiazjoo, N. H. Ferguson, S. W. Fosko, M. C. Fox, S. Goral, A. L. Gray, J. R. Griffin, R. R. Hachem, S. A. Hall [. . .] A. Menter [. . .] S. Y. Paek [. . .] and S. T. Arron (2019). “Initial Skin Cancer Screening for Solid Organ Transplant Recipients in the United States: Delphi Method Development of Expert Consensus Guidelines.” Transpl Int. Sep 10. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

Skin cancer is the most common malignancy affecting solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR), and SOTR experience increased skin cancer-associated morbidity and mortality. There are no formal multidisciplinary guidelines for skin cancer screening after transplant, and current practices are widely variable. We conducted three rounds of Delphi method surveys with a panel of 84 U.S. dermatologists and transplant physicians to establish skin cancer screening recommendations for SOTR. The transplant team should risk stratify SOTR for screening, and dermatologists should perform skin cancer screening by full-body skin examination. SOTR with a history of skin cancer should continue regular follow-up with dermatology for skin cancer surveillance. High-risk transplant patients include thoracic organ recipients, SOTR age 50 and above, and male SOTR. High-risk Caucasian patients should be screened within 2 years after transplant, all Caucasian, Asian, Hispanic, and high-risk African American patients should be screened within 5 years after transplant. No consensus was reached regarding screening for low-risk African American SOTR. We propose a standardized approach to skin cancer screening in SOTR based on multidisciplinary expert consensus. These guidelines prioritize and emphasize the need for screening for SOTR at greatest risk for skin cancer.

Chandra, A., M. Vaduganathan, E. F. Lewis, B. L. Claggett, A. R. Rizkala, W. Wang, M. P. Lefkowitz, V. C. Shi, I. S. Anand, J. Ge, C. S. P. Lam, A. P. Maggioni, F. Martinez, M. Packer, M. A. Pfeffer, B. Pieske, M. M. Redfield, J. L. Rouleau, D. J. Van Veldhuisen, F. Zannad, M. R. Zile, J. J. V. McMurray and S. D. Solomon (2019). “Health-Related Quality of Life in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: The Paragon-Hf Trial.” JACC Heart Fail 7(10): 862-874.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe baseline health-related quality of life (HRQL) in the PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HFpEF) trial, the largest heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) trial to date. BACKGROUND: There are limited data characterizing HRQL in patients with HFpEF using validated metrics. METHODS: The PARAGON-HF trial randomized symptomatic patients with HFpEF (>/=45%) >/=50 years of age to either sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan. The study reports comprehensive baseline HRQL using Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) administered at randomization after active run-in period. The study then compares baseline HRQL with patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (less-than-or-equal-to 40%) enrolled in the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with an ACE-Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) trial. Forward multivariable stepwise regression modeling was performed separately in both trials to identify independent clinical correlates of KCCQ-Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) score. PARADIGM-HF trial patients <50 years of age were excluded to enable comparison. RESULTS: In the PARAGON-HF trial, 4,735 of 4,822 patients (mean age 73 +/- 8 years; 48% men) completed baseline KCCQ at randomization. Mean KCCQ-OS score was 71. Women had worse mean KCCQ-OS score than men did. Patients in the PARAGON-HF trial reported lower KCCQ scores in nearly all domains when compared with the PARADIGM-HF trial (KCCQ-OS score 71 +/- 19 vs. 73 +/- 19; p < 0.001). The strongest independent clinical correlates of adverse HRQL in both the PARAGON-HF and PARADIGM-HF trials were New York Heart Association functional class, female gender, lower extremity edema, body mass index, angina, dyspnea, and paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. After accounting for these clinical correlates of adverse HRQL that were common to both HFpEF and HFrEF patients, KCCQ-OS score did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: HRQL was largely worse in women and was similar in HFpEF and HFrEF after accounting for variation in demographics, functional status, and symptom burden. (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HFpEF [PARAGON-HF] NCT01920711; Prospective Comparison of ARNI with an ACE-Inhibitor to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure [PARADIGM-HF]; NCT01035255).