Cardiology

Afzal, A., K. M. Tecson, A. K. Jamil, J. Felius, P. S. Garcha, S. A. Hall and S. A. Carey (2019). “The Effect of Obstructive Sleep Apnea on 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Who Underwent Orthotopic Heart Transplantation.” Am J Cardiol 124(1): 51-54.

Full text of this article.

Despite the well-known association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cardiovascular disease, there is a paucity of data regarding OSA in orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients and its effect on clinical outcomes. Hence, we sought to determine the association between OSA, as detected by polysomnography, and late graft dysfunction (LGD) after OHT. In this retrospective review of consecutive OHT recipients from 2012 to 2014 at our center, we examined LGD, i.e., graft failure >1 year after OHT, through competing risks analysis. Due to small sample size and event counts, as well as preliminary testing which revealed statistically similar demographics and outcomes, we pooled patients who had treated OSA with those who had no OSA. Of 146 patients, 29 (20%) had untreated OSA, i.e., OSA without use of continuous positive airway pressure therapy, at the time of transplantation. Patients with untreated OSA were significantly older, heavier, and more likely to have baseline hypertension than those with treated/no OSA. Although there were no differences between groups in regard to short-term complications of acute kidney injury, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, or primary graft dysfunction, there were significant differences in the occurrence of LGD. Those with untreated OSA were at 3 times the risk of developing LGD than those with treated/no OSA (hazard ratio 3.2; 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 7.9; p=0.01). Because OSA is a common co-morbidity of OHT patients and because patients with untreated OSA have an elevated risk of LGD, screening for and treating OSA should occur during the OHT selection period.

Balmforth, C., J. Simpson, L. Shen, P. S. Jhund, M. Lefkowitz, A. R. Rizkala, J. L. Rouleau, V. Shi, S. D. Solomon, K. Swedberg, M. R. Zile, M. Packer and J. J. V. McMurray (2019). “Outcomes and Effect of Treatment According to Etiology in HFrEF: An Analysis of PARADIGM-HF.” JACC Heart Fail 7(6): 457-465.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes (and the effect of sacubitril/valsartan) according to etiology in the PARADIGM-HF (Prospective comparison of angiotensin-receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI] with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor [ACEI] to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure) trial. BACKGROUND: Etiology of heart failure (HF) has changed over time in more developed countries and is also evolving in non-Western societies. Outcomes may vary according to etiology, as may the effects of therapy. METHODS: We examined outcomes and the effect of sacubtril/valsartan according to investigator-reported etiology in PARADIGM-HF. The outcomes analyzed were the primary composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, and components, and death from any cause. Outcomes were adjusted for known prognostic variables including N terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide. RESULTS: Among the 8,399 patients randomized, 5,036 patients (60.0%) had an ischemic etiology. Among the 3,363 patients (40.0%) with a nonischemic etiology, 1,595 (19.0% of all patients; 47% of nonischemic patients) had idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, 968 (11.5% of all patients; 28.8% of nonischemic patients) had a hypertensive cause, and 800 (9.5% of all patients, 23.8% of nonischemic patients) another cause (185 infective/viral, 158 alcoholic, 110 valvular, 66 diabetes, 30 drug-related, 14 peripartum-related, and 237 other). Whereas the unadjusted rates of all outcomes were highest in patients with an ischemic etiology, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were not different from patients in the 2 major nonischemic etiology categories; for example, for the primary outcome, compared with ischemic (HR: 1.00), hypertensive 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75 to 1.02), idiopathic 0.92 (95% CI: 0.82 to 1.04) and other 1.00 (95% CI: 0.85 to 1.17). The benefit of sacubitril/valsartan over enalapril was consistent across etiologic categories (interaction for primary outcome; p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Just under one-half of patients in this global trial had nonischemic HF with reduced ejection fraction, with idiopathic and hypertensive the most commonly ascribed etiologies. Adjusted outcomes were similar across etiologic categories, as was the benefit of sacubitril/valsartan over enalapril. (Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Enalapril on Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With Chronic Heart Failure; NCT01035255).

Bax, J. J., V. Delgado, R. T. Hahn, J. Leipsic, J. K. Min, P. Grayburn, L. Sondergaard, S. H. Yoon and S. Windecker (2019). “Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Role of Multimodality Imaging in Common and Complex Clinical Scenarios.” JACC Cardiovasc Imaging May 9. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established therapy for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Technological advances and the learning curve have resulted in better procedural results in terms of hemodynamic valve performance and intermediate-term clinical outcomes. The integration of anatomical and functional information provided by multimodality imaging has improved size selection of TAVR prostheses, permitted better patient selection, and provided new insights in the performance of the TAVR prostheses at follow-up. Furthermore, the field of TAVR continues to develop and expand the technique to younger patients with lower risk on the one hand, and more complex clinical scenarios, on the other hand, such as degenerated aortic bioprostheses, bicuspid aortic valves, or pure native aortic regurgitation. The present review article summarizes how multimodality imaging can be integrated in TAVR in clinical (sometimes complex) scenarios that have not been included in the landmark randomized clinical trials.

Giustino, G., J. Overbey, D. Taylor, G. Ailawadi, K. Kirkwood, J. DeRose, M. A. Gillinov, F. Dagenais, M. L. Mayer, A. Moskowitz, E. Bagiella, M. Miller, P. Grayburn, P. K. Smith, A. Gelijns, P. O’Gara, M. Acker, A. Lala and J. Hung (2019). “Sex-Based Differences in Outcomes After Mitral Valve Surgery for Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: From the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network.” JACC Heart Fail 7(6): 481-490.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated sex-based differences in outcomes after mitral valve (MV) surgery for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation (SIMR). BACKGROUND: Whether differences in outcomes exist between men and women after surgery for SIMR remains unknown. METHODS: Patients enrolled in a randomized trial comparing MV replacement versus MV repair for SIMR were included and followed for 2 years. Endpoints for this analysis included all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (defined as the composite of death, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, worsening New York Heart Association functional class or MV re-operation), quality of life (QOL), functional status, and percentage of change in left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) from baseline through 2 years. RESULTS: Of 251 patients enrolled in the trial, 96 (38.2%) were women. Compared with men, women had smaller LV volumes and effective regurgitant orifice areas (EROA) but greater EROA/left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume ratios. At 2 years, women had higher rates of all-cause mortality (27.1% vs. 17.4%, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR]: 1.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05 to 3.26; p = 0.03) and of MACCE (49.0% vs. 38.1%, respectively; adjHR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.37; p = 0.02). Women also reported worse QOL and functional status at 2 years. There were no significant differences in the percentage of change over 2 years in LVESVI between women and men (adjbeta: -10.4; 95% CI: -23.4 to 2.6; p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Women with SIMR displayed different echocardiographic features and experienced higher mortality and worse QOL after MV surgery than men. There were no significant differences in the degree of reverse LV remodeling between sexes. (Comparing the Effectiveness of Repairing Versus Replacing the Heart’s Mitral Valve in People With Severe Chronic Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation [Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation]; NCT00807040).

Packer, M. and P. A. Grayburn (2019). “Neurohormonal and Transcatheter Repair Strategies for Proportionate and Disproportionate Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Heart Failure.” JACC Heart Fail Jun; 7(6): 518-521. Epub 2019 May 8.

Full text of this article.

Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) is present to varying degrees in most patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, and in ~30% of its magnitude is hemodynamically meaningful. A critical determinant of MR in these patients is the degree of LV dilation. Remodeling and enlargement of the LV leads to displacement of the papillary muscles and widening and flattening of the mitral annulus, which (together with a reduction in closing forces) impairs the coaptation of the mitral valve (MV) leaflets. However. independent of LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), ventricular dyssynchrony contributes importantly to functional MR. In patients with meaningful QRS prolongation, dyssynchrony causes unequal contraction of papillary muscle bearing walls, preventing coordinated closure of the MV leaflets; amelioration of the conduction delay by cardiac resynchronization reduces MR. Additionally, irrespective of the presence of e1ec:trfc conduction delay, localized LV remodeling can cause apical and posterior displacement of the papillary muscles and dyssynchronous contraction of the leaflet-supporting structures independent of global LV dsyfunction. These observation suggest that patients with functional MR and HF include the following: 1) those whose MR can be entirely explained by the MV distortions produced by LV enlargement: and 2) those who had regional LV dysfunction inordinately interferes with the synchronous contraction of the papillary muscle segments that support normal MV coaptation. We refer to the first group as having MR that is “proportionate'” to LV enlargement and the second group as having MR that is “disproportionate” to LVEDV (i.e., the severity of MR is greater than predicted by LV volumes). (Excerpt from introduction to article in press, p. 518.)