Cardiology

Posted March 15th 2019

The Mitral Valve 16 Months After Operative Insertion of the Alfieri Stitch.

William C. Roberts M.D.

William C. Roberts M.D.

Fathima, S., S. A. Hall, P. A. Grayburn and W. C. Roberts (2019). “The Mitral Valve 16 Months After Operative Insertion of the Alfieri Stitch.” Am J Cardiol 123(4): 695-696.

Full text of this article.

We describe considerable fibrous thickening of the mitral leaflets 16 months after insertion of an Alfieri stitch in a previously anatomically normal but functionally regurgitant mitral valve. Whether this type of mitral thickening will occur after percutaneous insertion of the mitral clip for pure mitral regurgitation remains to be determined.


Posted March 15th 2019

Long-Term Survival Following Multivessel Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes: The FREEDOM Follow-On Study.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Farkouh, M. E., M. Domanski, G. D. Dangas, L. C. Godoy, M. J. Mack, F. S. Siami, T. H. Hamza, B. Shah, G. G. Stefanini, M. S. Sidhu, J. F. Tanguay, K. Ramanathan, S. K. Sharma, J. French, W. Hueb, D. J. Cohen and V. Fuster (2019). “Long-Term Survival Following Multivessel Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes: The FREEDOM Follow-On Study.” J Am Coll Cardiol 73(6): 629-638.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: The FREEDOM (Future Revascularization Evaluation in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Optimal Management of Multivessel Disease) trial demonstrated that for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and multivessel coronary disease (MVD), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (PCI-DES) in reducing the rate of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events after a median follow-up of 3.8 years. It is not known, however, whether CABG confers a survival benefit after an extended follow-up period. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term survival of DM patients with MVD undergoing coronary revascularization in the FREEDOM trial. METHODS: The FREEDOM trial randomized 1,900 patients with DM and MVD to undergo either PCI with sirolimus-eluting or paclitaxel-eluting stents or CABG on a background of optimal medical therapy. After completion of the trial, enrolling centers and patients were invited to participate in the FREEDOM Follow-On study. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for subgroup and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 25 centers (of 140 original centers) agreed to participate in the FREEDOM Follow-On study and contributed a total of 943 patients (49.6% of the original cohort) with a median follow-up of 7.5 years (range 0 to 13.2 years). Of the 1,900 patients, there were 314 deaths during the entire follow-up period (204 deaths in the original trial and 110 deaths in the FREEDOM Follow-On). The all-cause mortality rate was significantly higher in the PCI-DES group than in the CABG group (24.3% [159 deaths] vs. 18.3% [112 deaths]; hazard ratio: 1.36; 95% confidence interval: 1.07 to 1.74; p = 0.01). Of the 943 patients with extended follow-up, the all-cause mortality rate was 23.7% (99 deaths) in the PCI-DES group and 18.7% (72 deaths) in the CABG group (hazard ratio: 1.32; 95% confidence interval: 0.97 to 1.78; p = 0.076). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with DM and MVD, coronary revascularization with CABG leads to lower all-cause mortality than with PCI-DES in long-term follow-up. (Comparison of Two Treatments for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in Individuals With Diabetes [FREEDOM]; NCT00086450).


Posted March 15th 2019

Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Intact Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms.

Justin M. Schaffer, M.D.

Justin M. Schaffer, M.D.

Chiu, P., A. B. Goldstone, J. M. Schaffer, B. Lingala, D. C. Miller, R. S. Mitchell, Y. J. Woo, M. P. Fischbein and M. D. Dake (2019). “Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Intact Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms.” J Am Coll Cardiol 73(6): 643-651.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: For the management of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, recent evidence has suggested that outcomes of open surgical repair may surpass thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in as early as 2 years. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of TEVAR and open surgical repair in the treatment of intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. METHODS: Using the Medicare database, a retrospective study using regression discontinuity design and propensity score matching was performed on patients with intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms who underwent TEVAR or open surgical repair between 1999 and 2010 with follow-up through 2014. Survival was assessed with restricted mean survival time. Perioperative mortality was assessed with logistic regression. Reintervention was evaluated as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Matching created comparable groups with 1,235 open surgical repair patients matched to 2,470 TEVAR patients. The odds of perioperative mortality were greater for open surgical repair: high-volume center, odds ratio (OR): 1.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.53 to 2.61); low-volume center, OR: 3.62 (95% CI: 2.88 to 4.51). The restricted mean survival time difference favored TEVAR at 9 years, -209.2 days (95% CI: -298.7 to -119.7 days; p < 0.001) for open surgical repair. Risk of reintervention was lower for open surgical repair, hazard ratio: 0.40 (95% CI: 0.34 to 0.60; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical repair was associated with increased odds of early postoperative mortality but reduced late hazard of death. Despite the late advantage of open repair, mean survival was superior for TEVAR. TEVAR should be considered the first line for repair of intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms in Medicare beneficiaries.


Posted March 15th 2019

Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Risk.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Baron, S. J., K. Wang, J. A. House, E. A. Magnuson, M. R. Reynolds, R. Makkar, H. C. Herrmann, S. Kodali, V. H. Thourani, S. Kapadia, L. Svensson, M. J. Mack, D. L. Brown, M. J. Russo, C. R. Smith, J. Webb, C. Miller, M. B. Leon and D. J. Cohen (2019). “Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Risk.” Circulation 139(7): 877-888.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at intermediate surgical risk, treatment with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) results in similar rates of death or stroke at 2 years. Whether TAVR is cost-effective compared with SAVR for intermediate-risk patients remains uncertain. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2014, 3110 intermediate-risk AS patients were treated with TAVR or SAVR in the PARTNER 2 trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves 2). A total of 2032 patients were randomized to receive TAVR using the SAPIEN XT valve (XT-TAVR) or SAVR in the PARTNER 2A trial, whereas the PARTNER S3i registry included an additional 1078 patients treated with TAVR using the SAPIEN 3 valve (S3-TAVR), which offers a lower delivery profile and sealing skirt designed to reduce paravalvular regurgitation compared with XT-TAVR. Procedural costs were estimated using measured resource utilization. Other in-trial costs were assessed by linkage of trial data with Medicare claims (n=2333) or by linear regression models for unlinked patients (n=682). Health utilities were estimated using the EQ-5D at baseline and 1, 12, and 24 months. Using a Markov model informed by in-trial costs, utilities, and survival data, lifetime cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the US healthcare system was estimated in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. RESULTS: Although procedural costs were approximately $20 000 higher with TAVR than SAVR, total cost differences for the index hospitalization were only $2888 higher with XT-TAVR ( P=0.014) and were $4155 lower with S3-TAVR ( P<0.001) owing to reductions in length of stay with TAVR. Follow-up costs were significantly lower with XT-TAVR (Delta=-$9304; P<0.001) and S3-TAVR (Delta=-$11 377; P<0.001) than with SAVR. Over a lifetime horizon, TAVR was projected to lower total costs by $8000 to $10 000 and to increase quality-adjusted survival by 0.15 to 0.27 years. XT-TAVR and S3-TAVR were found to be economically dominant compared with SAVR in 84% and 97% of bootstrap replicates, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among intermediate-risk AS patients, TAVR is projected to be economically dominant from the perspective of the US healthcare system by providing both greater quality-adjusted life expectancy and lower long-term costs than SAVR. If long-term data demonstrate comparable late mortality with TAVR and SAVR, these findings suggest that TAVR might be the preferred treatment strategy for intermediate-risk AS patients based on both clinical and economic considerations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01314313.


Posted March 15th 2019

Impact of Short-Term Complications on Mortality and Quality of Life After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Michael J. Mack M.D.E

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Arnold, S. V., Y. Zhang, S. J. Baron, T. C. McAndrew, M. C. Alu, S. K. Kodali, S. Kapadia, V. H. Thourani, D. C. Miller, M. J. Mack, M. B. Leon and D. J. Cohen (2019). “Impact of Short-Term Complications on Mortality and Quality of Life After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.” JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12(4): 362-369.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the independent association of short-term complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with survival and quality of life at 1 year. BACKGROUND: Prior studies have examined the mortality and cost implications of various complications of TAVR. However, many of these complications may primarily affect patients’ quality of life after TAVR, which has not been previously studied. METHODS: Among patients at intermediate or high surgical risk who underwent TAVR as part of the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve) 2 studies and survived 30 days, the association between complications within the 30 days after TAVR and mortality and quality of life at 1 year was examined. Quality of life was assessed using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire and the Short-Form 12. Complications assessed included major and minor stroke, life-threatening and major bleeding, vascular injury, stage 3 acute kidney injury, new pacemaker implantation, and mild and moderate or severe paravalvular leak (PVL). Multivariable models that included all complications as well as baseline clinical factors were used to examine the independent association of each complication with outcomes. RESULTS: Among 3,763 TAVR patients, major stroke and stage 3 acute kidney injury were associated with markedly increased risk for 1-year mortality, with adjusted hazard ratios of 5.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1 to 9.5) and 4.9 (95% CI: 2.7 to 8.8), respectively, as well as poorer quality of life among survivors (reductions in 1-year Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score of 15.1 points [95% CI: 24.8 to 5.3 points] and 14.7 points [95% CI: 25.6 to 3.8 points], respectively). Moderate or severe PVL, life-threatening bleeding, and major bleeding were each associated with a more modest increase in mortality and decrement in quality of life, whereas mild PVL was associated with a small decrease in quality of life. After adjusting for baseline characteristics and other complications, need for a new pacemaker, minor stroke, and vascular injury were not independently associated with poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing TAVR, similar events are associated with increased mortality and impaired quality of life at 1 year. These results suggest that despite considerable progress, efforts to further reduce stroke, acute kidney injury, bleeding, and moderate or severe PVL are likely to yield important clinical benefits and remain key targets for device iteration and procedural improvement.