The Volume-Outcome Relationship Revisited: Does It Matter for High-Risk PCI?

Gregory J. Dehmer M.D.
Brindis, R. G. and G. J. Dehmer (2016). “The volume-outcome relationship revisited: Does it matter for high-risk pci?” JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9(20): 2094-2096.
The National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) CathPCI registry collects clinical data from >90% of all PCIs performed in the United States. Excluding patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions, aggregate data from 2015 show an in-hospital mortality rate of 0.89%, while elective PCI mortality is 0.65% 5 and 6. The small number of deaths for a given operator, coupled with estimates of the case volume for operators in the United States (mean 59 cases annually, with 61% of operators performing <40 cases annually in 2008), results in a very wide confidence interval around the point estimate of PCI mortality for an operator (7). In addition, the interplay between facility and individual operator volumes, the operator’s lifetime experience, and the operator’s performance of non-PCI procedures (structural and peripheral arterial interventions) confound the assessment of a relationship between operator PCI case volume and outcomes (3). On the basis of these considerations, there are 2 possible approaches for a continuing examination of the relationship between operator volume and outcomes. One approach would require the collection of operator mortality data over many years to obtain a sample size that would allow meaningful differentiation among operators. For an individual operator, this would likely include mostly low-complexity, low-risk cases mixed with a few high-complexity, high-risk cases. Given the low and decreasing case volume for U.S. operators, the time required to obtain an adequate number of cases is impractical. The alternative approach is to focus on high-complexity, high-risk cases, for which the number of cases needed to discriminate among operators should be lower and obtainable. This latter approach was examined by Xu et al. (8) in a report in this issue of JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions.