Cardiology

Posted July 15th 2021

Current Penetration, Completeness, and Representativeness of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.

James R. Edgerton M.D.

James R. Edgerton M.D.

Jacobs, J.P., Shahian, D.M., Grau-Sepulveda, M., O’Brien, S.M., Pruitt, E.Y., Bloom, J.P., Edgerton, J.R., Kurlansky, P.A., Habib, R.H., Antman, M.S., Cleveland, J.C., Jr., Fernandez, F.G., Thourani, V.H. and Badhwar, V. (2021). “Current Penetration, Completeness, and Representativeness of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database.” Ann Thorac Surg Jun 18;S0003-4975(21)01039-0. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) is the largest cardiac surgical database in the world. Linked data from STS ACSD and the CMS Medicare database were used to determine contemporary completeness, penetration, and representativeness of STS ACSD. METHODS: Using variables common to both STS and CMS databases, STS procedures were linked to CMS data for all CMS CABG discharges between 2000 and 2018, inclusive. For each CMS CABG hospitalization, it was determined whether a matching STS record existed. RESULTS: Center-level penetration (number of CMS sites with at least one matched STS participant divided by total number of CMS CABG sites) increased from 45% in 2000 to 95% in 2018. In 2018, 949 of 1,004 CMS CABG sites (95%) were linked to an STS site. Patient-level penetration (number of CMS CABG hospitalizations at STS sites divided by total number of CMS CABG hospitalizations) increased from 51% in 2000 to 97% in 2018. In 2018, 68,584 of 70,818 CMS CABG hospitalizations (97%) occurred at an STS site. Completeness of case inclusion at STS sites (number of CMS CABG cases at STS sites linked to STS records divided by total number of CMS CABG cases at STS sites) increased from 88% in 2000 to 98% in 2018. In 2018, 66,673 of 68,108 CMS CABG hospitalizations at STS sites (98%) were linked to an STS record. CONCLUSIONS: Linkage of STS and CMS databases demonstrates high and increasing penetration and completeness of STS ACSD. STS ACSD now includes 97% of CABG in USA.


Posted July 15th 2021

Phytochemicals as Therapeutic Interventions in Peripheral Artery Disease.

Robert S. Smith M.D.

Robert S. Smith M.D.

Ismaeel, A., Greathouse, K.L., Newton, N., Miserlis, D., Papoutsi, E., Smith, R.S., Eidson, J.L., Dawson, D.L., Milner, C.W., Widmer, R.J., Bohannon, W.T. and Koutakis, P. (2021). “Phytochemicals as Therapeutic Interventions in Peripheral Artery Disease.” Nutrients 13(7).

Full text of this article.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects over 200 million people worldwide, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality, yet treatment options remain limited. Among the manifestations of PAD is a severe functional disability and decline, which is thought to be the result of different pathophysiological mechanisms including oxidative stress, skeletal muscle pathology, and reduced nitric oxide bioavailability. Thus, compounds that target these mechanisms may have a therapeutic effect on walking performance in PAD patients. Phytochemicals produced by plants have been widely studied for their potential health effects and role in various diseases including cardiovascular disease and cancer. In this review, we focus on PAD and discuss the evidence related to the clinical utility of different phytochemicals. We discuss phytochemical research in preclinical models of PAD, and we highlight the results of the available clinical trials that have assessed the effects of these compounds on PAD patient functional outcomes.


Posted July 15th 2021

Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Molly Szerlip M.D.

Molly Szerlip M.D.

Herrmann, H.C., Cohen, D.J., Hahn, R.T., Babaliaros, V.C., Yu, X., Makkar, R., McCabe, J., Szerlip, M., Kapadia, S., Russo, M., Malaisrie, S.C., Webb, J.G., Szeto, W.Y., Kodali, S., Thourani, V.H., Mack, M.J. and Leon, M.B. (2021). “Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.” Circ Cardiovasc Interv Jun 16;CIRCINTERVENTIONS120010310. [Epub ahead of print]. Circinterventions120010310.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: The potential advantages for conscious sedation (CS) as compared to general anesthesia (GA) have not been evaluated in studies with core laboratory echocardiographic assessments and monitored end points. We compared CS versus GA for SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients at intermediate- and low-surgical risk. METHODS: This analysis included patients in the PARTNER 2 (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve Trial) intermediate-risk registry and the PARTNER 3 randomized low-risk study. CS was compared to GA with respect to death, stroke, bleeding, paravalvular regurgitation, length of stay, and costs. Outcomes were assessed by a core echocardiographic laboratory, and clinical events were independently adjudicated. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the CS and GA groups. Postprocedure hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for CS versus GA both in intermediate-risk patients (4.4±0.2 and 5.2±0.2 days, respectively, P<0.01) and low-risk patients (2.7±0.1 and 3.4±0.2 days, respectively, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between CA and GA patients in either the 30-day or 1-year rates of death, stroke, rehospitalization, or paravalvular aortic regurgitation ≥moderate. In the intermediate-risk cohort, adjusted 30-day health care costs were $3833 lower per patient in the CS group. CONCLUSIONS: The selective use of CS is associated with shorter procedure times, shorter intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, lower costs, and no difference in clinical outcomes to 1 year, including ≥moderate paravalvular regurgitation. Our data demonstrate similar safety profiles with both approaches and support the continued use of CS for most patients undergoing the procedure. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT03222128 and NCT02675114.


Posted July 15th 2021

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery after previous sternotomy: A propensity-matched analysis.

Mohanad Hamandi, M.D.

Mohanad Hamandi, M.D.

Hamandi, M., Squiers, J.J., Lanfear, A.T., Banwait, J.K., Meidan, T.G., Smith, R.L., Hutcheson, K., DiMaio, J.M., Mack, M.J., George, T.J. and Ryan, W.H. (2021). “Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery after previous sternotomy: A propensity-matched analysis.” J Card Surg Jun 6. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: Although the incidence of mitral valve (MV) surgery after previous open-heart surgery is increasing, there is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach. Reoperative MV surgery is most commonly performed via sternotomy (ST). We sought to determine whether minimally-invasive (MIS) reoperative MV surgery is safe and feasible. METHODS: All patients with a history of ST undergoing MV surgery with or without concomitant tricuspid or atrial fibrillation surgery at a single institution from 2007 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. ST and MIS approaches were compared using propensity-matched analysis. The coprimary endpoints were operative mortality and 1-year survival, and secondary endpoints were operative complications and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 305 isolated MV reoperations were performed: 199 (65%) MIS and 106 (35%) ST. MIS patients were older than ST patients (71 [63, 76.5] vs. 66 [56, 72] years, p < .01), more likely to have undergone prior coronary artery bypass grafting (57% vs. 27%, p < .01), and less likely to have had prior valve surgery (55% vs. 78%, p < .01). In unmatched comparisons, operative mortality was significantly lower among MIS patients (3.0% vs. 8.5%, p = .04), but 1-year mortality was similar (14.4% vs. 15.6%, p = .8). After propensity matching, 88 pairs had excellent balance across baseline characteristics. Mortality was similar among MIS and ST patients at 30 days (3.4% vs. 8%, p = .19) and 1 year (15.9% vs. 16.5%, p = .9). RBC and fresh frozen plasma transfusions were significantly lower in the MIS group (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: A minimally invasive approach is a safe alternative in patients with prior ST undergoing MV surgery.


Posted July 15th 2021

Doppler Velocity Index Outcomes Following Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the PARTNER Trials.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Hahn, R.T., Douglas, P.S., Jaber, W.A., Leipsic, J., Kapadia, S., Thourani, V.H., Makkar, R., Kodali, S., Clavel, M.A., Khalique, O.K., Weissman, N.J., Blanke, P., Chen, Y., Smith, C.R., Mack, M.J., Leon, M.B. and Pibarot, P. (2021). “Doppler Velocity Index Outcomes Following Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the PARTNER Trials.” JACC Cardiovasc Interv Jun 23;S1936-8798(21)00682-8. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the association between Doppler velocity index (DVI) and 2-year outcomes for balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). BACKGROUND: DVI >0.35 is normal for a prosthetic valve, but recent studies suggest that DVI <0.50 is associated with poor outcomes following TAVR. METHODS: Patients with severe aortic stenosis enrolled in the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve) 2 (intermediate surgical risk) or PARTNER 3 (low surgical risk) trial undergoing TAVR (n = 1,450) or SAVR (n = 1,303) were included. Patients were divided into 3 DVI groups on the basis of core laboratory-assessed discharge or 30-day echocardiograms: DVI(LOW) (≤0.35), DVI(INTERMEDIATE) (>0.35 to ≤0.50), and DVI(HIGH) (>0.50). Two-year outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Following TAVR, there were no differences among the 3 DVI groups in composite outcomes of death, stroke, or rehospitalization or in any individual components of 2-year outcomes (P > 0.70 for all). Following SAVR, there was no difference among DVI groups in the composite outcome (P = 0.27), but there was a significant association with rehospitalization (P = 0.02). Restricted cubic-spline analysis for combined outcomes showed an increased risk with post-SAVR DVI ≤0.35 but no relationship post-TAVR. DVI ≤0.35 was associated with increased 2-year composite outcome for SAVR (HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.29-2.54; P < 0.001), with no adverse outcomes for TAVR (P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: In intermediate- and low-risk cohorts of the PARTNER trials, DVI ≤0.35 predicted worse 2-year outcomes following SAVR, driven primarily by rehospitalization, with no adverse outcomes associated with DVI following TAVR with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 valve.