Cardiology

Posted June 24th 2020

Impact of mitral regurgitation on cardiovascular hospitalization and death in newly diagnosed heart failure patients.

Peter McCullough, M.D.

Peter McCullough, M.D.

Cork, D. P., P. A. McCullough, H. S. Mehta, C. M. Barker, C. Gunnarsson, M. P. Ryan, E. R. Baker, J. Van Houten, S. Mollenkopf and P. Verta (2020). “Impact of mitral regurgitation on cardiovascular hospitalization and death in newly diagnosed heart failure patients.” ESC Heart Fail May 29. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

AIMS: Heart failure (HF) carries a poor prognosis, and the impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) is not well understood. This analysis aimed to estimate the incremental effect of MR in patients newly diagnosed with HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases were analysed. Included patients had at least one inpatient or two outpatient HF claims. A 6 month post-period after HF index was used to capture MR diagnosis and severity. HF patients were separated into three cohorts: without MR (no MR), not clinically significant MR (nsMR), and significant MR (sMR). Time-to-event analyses were modelled to estimate the clinical burden of disease. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death or cardiovascular (CV)-related admission. Secondary outcomes were death and CV hospitalization alone. All models controlled for baseline demographics and co-morbidities. Patients with sMR were at significantly higher risk of either death or CV admission compared with patients with no MR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.39]. When evaluating death alone, patients with sMR had significantly higher risk of death (HR 1.24; 95% CI 1.08-1.43) compared with patients with no MR. When evaluating CV admission alone, patients with MR were at higher risk of hospital admission vs. patients with no MR, and the magnitude was dependent upon the MR severity: sMR (HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.38-1.74) and nsMR (HR 1.23; 95% CI 1.08-1.40). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of MR in retrospective claims significantly increases the clinical burden of incident HF patients. Time to death and CV hospitalizations are increased when MR is clinically significant.


Posted June 24th 2020

Giant Right Coronary Artery Aneurysms.

Dan M. Meyer, M.D.

Dan M. Meyer, M.D.

Chalkley, R. A., W. C. Roberts, S. Patlolla, J. M. Schussler, R. W. Snyder, 2nd, R. L. Smith, 2nd, C. S. Roberts and D. M. Meyer (2020). “Giant Right Coronary Artery Aneurysms.” Am J Cardiol 125(10): 1599-1601.

Full text of this article.

Described herein are 2 adults with right coronary artery aneurysms measuring ≥4.0 cm in maximal diameter. Each aneurysm contained huge intra-aneurysm thrombus and each coronary artery contained atherosclerotic plaques diffusely. Each aneurysm was resected without complication and each patient has resumed preoperative level of activities without limitations.


Posted June 24th 2020

Three-dimensional echocardiography assessment of carcinoid valvular heart disease: Images of each and all.

Daniel L. Beckles, M.D.

Daniel L. Beckles, M.D.

Cai, Q., D. L. Beckles and M. Ahmad (2020). “Three-dimensional echocardiography assessment of carcinoid valvular heart disease: Images of each and all.” Echocardiography 37(5): 791-793.

Full text of this article.

A 54-year-old male was found to have neuroendocrine carcinoma with hepatic metastasis. Two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) demonstrated dilated right ventricle and right atrium, and severe tricuspid and pulmonary regurgitation. Three-dimensional (3D) TTE en-face views showed thickened, retracted, and fixed tricuspid valve and pulmonic valve which remained widely open throughout the cardiac cycle. 3D TTE, particularly en-face views, demonstrates incremental value over 2D TTE by providing precise valvular anatomic details comparable to surgical findings. 3D TTE also offers a unique opportunity to assess all four valves simultaneously with en-face views to delineate their relationships with surrounding structures.


Posted June 24th 2020

Mitral Stenosis After MitraClip: How to Avoid and How to Treat.

Molly Szerlip M.D.

Molly Szerlip M.D.

Al-Azizi, K. and M. Szerlip (2020). “Mitral Stenosis After MitraClip: How to Avoid and How to Treat.” Curr Cardiol Rep 22(7): 50.

Full text of this article.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of the paper is to highlight the importance of procedural planning and patient selection when using the MitraClip device in treating severe mitral regurgitation (MR). RECENT FINDINGS: Following the recent results of the COAPT trial and FDA approval for functional MR patients, the indications for mitral clip are continuing to expand. Because of this, mitral stenosis from mitral clip can become a problem if the appropriate patients are not selected. Proper valve imaging, utilizing 3D transesophageal echocardiography to identify the pathology, is important to prevent iatrogenic mitral stenosis. In the unfortunate event of severe mitral stenosis as a result of the MitraClip device, surgery is the only treatment.


Posted May 15th 2020

Comparing Effectiveness of Initial Airway Interventions for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Clinical Controlled Trials.

Eric Chou, M.D.

Eric Chou, M.D.

Wang, C. H., A. F. Lee, W. T. Chang, C. H. Huang, M. S. Tsai, E. Chou, C. C. Lee, S. C. Chen and W. J. Chen (2020). “Comparing Effectiveness of Initial Airway Interventions for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Clinical Controlled Trials.” Ann Emerg Med 75(5): 627-636.

Full text of this article.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We compare effectiveness of different airway interventions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases from their inception through August 2018 and selected randomized controlled trials or quasi randomized controlled trials comparing intubation, supraglottic airways, or bag-valve-mask ventilation for treating adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. We performed a network meta-analysis along with sensitivity analyses to investigate the influence of high intubation success rate on meta-analytic results. RESULTS: A total of 8 randomized controlled trials and 3 quasi randomized controlled trials were included in the network meta-analysis: 7,361 patients received intubation, 7,475 received supraglottic airway, and 1,201 received bag-valve-mask ventilation. The network meta-analysis indicated no differences among these interventions for survival or neurologic outcomes at hospital discharge. Rather, network meta-analysis suggested that supraglottic airway improved the rate of return of spontaneous circulation compared with intubation (odds ratio 1.11; 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.20) or bag-valve-mask ventilation (odds ratio 1.35; 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 1.63). Furthermore, intubation improved the rate of return of spontaneous circulation compared with bag-valve-mask ventilation (odds ratio 1.21; 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.44). The sensitivity analyses revealed that the meta-analytic results were sensitive to the intubation success rates across different out-of-hospital care systems. CONCLUSION: Although there were no differences in long-term survival or neurologic outcome among these airway interventions, these system-based comparisons demonstrated that supraglottic airway was better than intubation or bag-valve-mask ventilation and intubation was better than bag-valve-mask ventilation in improving return of spontaneous circulation. The intubation success rate greatly influenced the meta-analytic results, and therefore these comparison results should be interpreted with these system differences in mind.