Cardiology

Packer, M. (2019). “Why Are Physicians So Confused about Acute Heart Failure? Reply.” N Engl J Med 381(24): 2375-2376.

Full text of this article.

[The author’s response to letters concerning his commentary, “Why are physicians so confused about acute heart failure?” N Engl J Med 2019; Aug 22; 381(8):776-777.]

Lanfear, A. T., M. Hamandi, J. Fan, J. M. DiMaio and T. J. George (2020). “Trends in HeartMate 3: What we know so far.” J Card Surg 35(1): 180-187.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a novel, intrapericardial, centrifugal-flow pump with a fully magnetically-levitated rotor designed to provide hemodynamic support in patients with end-stage heart failure. Unique aspects of this LVAD have allowed for improved hemocompatibility and the development of minimally-invasive implantation techniques. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for publications relating to the HeartMate 3 device, with a focus on hemocompatibility related outcomes, anticoagulation management, and surgical techniques. RESULTS: Nine articles analyzing hemocompatibility related outcomes from two clinical trials, two clinical studies, and one registry series were identified. CONCLUSION: HeartMate 3 has reduced the rate of disabling stroke and pump thrombosis. However, despite increased hemocompatibility due to specialized design features, the residual risk of both surgical, and gastrointestinal bleeding remains a major adverse outcome. Different anticoagulation management and surgical techniques have been evaluated to address the remaining complications.

Baron, S. J., E. A. Magnuson, M. Lu, K. Wang, K. Chinnakondepalli, M. Mack, V. H. Thourani, S. Kodali, R. Makkar, H. C. Herrmann, S. Kapadia, V. Babaliaros, M. R. Williams, D. Kereiakes, A. Zajarias, M. C. Alu, J. G. Webb, C. R. Smith, M. B. Leon and D. J. Cohen (2019). “Health Status After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis.” J Am Coll Cardiol 74(23): 2833-2842.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at low surgical risk, treatment with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) results in lower rates of death, stroke, and rehospitalization at 1 year compared with surgical aortic valve replacement; however, the effect of treatment strategy on health status is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare health status outcomes of TAVR versus surgery in low-risk patients with severe AS. METHODS: Between March 2016 and October 2017, 1,000 low-risk patients with AS were randomized to transfemoral TAVR using a balloon-expandable valve or surgery in the PARTNER 3 (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial. Health status was assessed at baseline and 1, 6, and 12 months using the KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire), SF-36 (Short Form-36 Health Survey), and EQ-5D (EuroQoL). The primary endpoint was change in KCCQ-OS (KCCQ Overall Summary) score over time. Longitudinal growth curve modeling was used to compare changes in health status between treatment groups over time. RESULTS: At 1 month, TAVR was associated with better health status than surgery (mean difference in KCCQ-OS 16.0 points; p < 0.001). At 6 and 12 months, health status remained better with TAVR, although the effect was reduced (mean difference in KCCQ-OS 2.6 and 1.8 points respectively; p < 0.04 for both). The proportion of patients with an excellent outcome (alive with KCCQ-OS >/=75 and no significant decline from baseline) was greater with TAVR than surgery at 6 months (90.3% vs. 85.3%; p = 0.03) and 12 months (87.3% vs. 82.8%; p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Among low-risk patients with severe AS, TAVR was associated with meaningful early and late health status benefits compared with surgery.

Xenogiannis, I., F. Gkargkoulas, D. Karmpaliotis, K. Alaswad, O. Krestyaninov, D. Khelimskii, J. W. Choi [ . . . ] S. Potluri, J. W. Moses, N. J. Lembo, M. Parikh, A. J. Kirtane, Z. A. Ali, A. B. Hall, E. Vemmou, I. Nikolakopoulos, B. B. Dargham, B. V. Rangan, S. Abdullah, S. Garcia, S. Banerjee, M. N. Burke and E. S. Brilakis (2019). “The Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Insights From PROGRESS-CTO Registry).” Angiology Dec 17. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

The impact of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients undergoing chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has received limited study. We reviewed 3999 CTO PCIs performed in 3914 patients between 2012 and 2018 at 25 centers, 14% of whom had a history of PAD. We compared the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients with versus without history of PAD. Patients with PAD were older (67 +/- 9 vs 64 +/- 10 years, P < .001) and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. They also had more complex lesions as illustrated by higher Japanese CTO score (2.7 +/- 1.2 vs 2.4 +/- 1.3, P < .001). In patients with PAD, the final crossing technique was less often antegrade wire escalation (40% vs 51%, P < .001) and more often the retrograde approach (23 vs 20%, P < .001) and antegrade dissection/reentry (20% vs 16%, P < .001). Technical success was similar between the 2 study groups (84% vs 87%, P = .127), but procedural success was lower for patients with PAD (81% vs 85%, P = .015). The incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events was higher among patients with PAD (3% vs 2%, P = .046). In conclusion, patients with PAD undergoing CTO PCI have more comorbidities, more complex lesions, and lower procedural success.

Sengupta, A., S. Zaid, N. Kamioka, J. Terre, M. Miyasaka, S. A. Hirji, M. Hensey, N. Geloo, G. Petrossian, N. Robinson, E. Sarin, L. Ryan, S. H. Yoon, C. W. Tan, O. K. Khalique, S. K. Kodali, T. Kaneko, P. B. Shah, S. C. Wong, A. Salemi, K. Sharma, J. A. Kozina, M. A. Szerlip, C. W. Don, S. Gafoor, M. Zhang, Z. Newhart, S. R. Kapadia, S. L. Mick, A. Krishnaswamy, A. Kini, H. Ahmad, S. L. Lansman, M. J. Mack, J. G. Webb, V. Babaliaros, V. H. Thourani, R. R. Makkar, M. B. Leon, I. George and G. H. L. Tang (2019). “Mid-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Extremely Large Annuli With Edwards SAPIEN 3 Valve.” JACC Cardiovasc Interv Dec 18. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report the 1-year results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Edwards SAPIEN 3 (S3) valve in extremely large annuli. BACKGROUND: Favorable 30-day outcomes of S3 TAVR in annuli >683 mm(2) have previously been reported. Pacemaker implantation rates were acceptable, and a larger left ventricular outflow tract and more eccentric annular anatomy were associated with increasing paravalvular leak. METHODS: From December 2013 to December 2018, 105 patients across 15 centers with mean area 721.3 +/- 36.1 mm(2) (range: 683.5 to 852.0 mm(2)) underwent TAVR using an S3 device. Clinical, anatomic, and procedural characteristics were analyzed. One-year survival and echocardiographic follow-up were reached in 94.3% and 82.1% of patients, respectively. Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 30-day and 1-year outcomes were reported. RESULTS: The mean age was 76.9 +/- 10.4 years, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk score averaged 5.2 +/- 3.4%. One-year overall mortality and stroke rates were 18.2% and 2.4%, respectively. Quality-of-life index improved from baseline to 30 days and at 1 year (p < 0.001 for both). Mild paravalvular aortic regurgitation occurred in 21.7% of patients, while moderate or greater paravalvular aortic regurgitation occurred in 4.3%. Mild and moderate or severe transvalvular aortic regurgitation occurred in 11.6% and 0%, respectively. Valve gradients remained stable at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: S3 TAVR in annular areas >683 mm(2) is feasible, with favorable mid-term outcomes.