Dermatology

Posted February 15th 2017

Ethical dilemma in missed melanoma: What to tell the patient and other providers.

Alan M. Menter M.D.

Alan M. Menter M.D.

Vangipuram, R., M. E. Horner and A. Menter (2017). “Ethical dilemma in missed melanoma: What to tell the patient and other providers.” J Am Acad Dermatol 76(2): 365-367.

Full text of this article.

Case scenario A 77-year-old man presented to his podiatrist for evaluation of a dystrophic left great toenail. A nail avulsion procedure was performed with debridement. At 6-month follow-up the patient had a persistent nonhealing lesion, resulting in a biopsy being performed by the podiatrist. Histopathological analysis revealed a “nodular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate without a neoplastic process.” The podiatrist reassured the patient that the lesion was not worrisome and continued regular debridements over the ensuing 15 months. Because of lack of improvement, the podiatrist then referred the patient to a dermatologist for further evaluation. At that time, the lesion demonstrated pigmentation extending focally to the cuticle (Hutchinson sign) with a nodular growth pattern. Repeated biopsy specimen reported “malignant melanoma with 2.4-mm Breslow depth.” Treatment included great toe amputation and sentinel lymph node biopsy, which indicated metastasis with micronodular involvement. Upon further histologic review of the original biopsy specimen taken 2 years prior, malignant melanoma was noted to be present to a depth of 2.2 mm.


Posted January 15th 2017

Efficacy of Secukinumab on Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis Affecting Different Body Regions: a Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies.

Alan M. Menter M.D.

Alan M. Menter, M.D.

Menter, A., J. C. Cather, M. Jarratt, X. Meng, A. Guana and J. Nyirady (2016). “Efficacy of Secukinumab on Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis Affecting Different Body Regions: a Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies.” Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 6(4): 639-647.

Full text of this article.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of psoriasis varies with the body region affected. In addition, patients have different perceptions of disease improvement and treatment satisfaction based on the location of skin clearance with treatment. The monoclonal antibody secukinumab selectively targets interleukin-17A-a central cytokine of psoriasis-and provides rapid and sustained clearance for moderate-to-severe psoriasis affecting all body regions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of secukinumab on moderate-to-severe psoriasis affecting the trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. METHODS: Data were pooled from four phase 3 studies. To be included in the analysis for each body region, patients were required to have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score >/=12 for that body region and psoriasis covering >/=10% of the surface area of that region. Secukinumab was administered at Baseline, Weeks 1, 2 and 3, and then every 4 weeks from Week 4 to 48. RESULTS: Across the trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, initial PASI subscore responses were sustained to Week 52. At Week 52, trunk (T) PASI 90/100 responses were achieved by 78.4%/71.1% of patients receiving secukinumab 300 mg, respectively, and by 66.3%/56.9% of patients receiving secukinumab 150 mg, respectively. At Week 52, upper limb (UL) PASI 90/100 responses were achieved by 67.3%/59.1% of patients receiving secukinumab 300 mg, respectively, and by 50.3%/43.3% of patients receiving secukinumab 150 mg, respectively. At Week 52, lower limb (LL) PASI 90/100 responses were achieved by 63.9%/55.3% of patients receiving secukinumab 300 mg, respectively, and by 45.1%/36.4% of patients receiving secukinumab 150 mg, respectively. A 50% reduction in mean PASI subscore occurred after 2.8, 2.9, and 3.4 weeks with secukinumab 300 mg on the trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, respectively. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab provided robust and sustained efficacy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis affecting the trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs.


Posted January 15th 2017

Ulcerated draining plaque below stoma.

John R. Griffin M.D.

John R. Griffin M.D.

Call, E., J. Cizenski and J. Griffin (2017). “Ulcerated draining plaque below stoma.” Int J Dermatol 56(1): 27-28.

Full text of this article.

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be performed without additional risk of operative mortality or major morbidity, and is recommended at the time of concomitant mitral operations to restore sinus rhythm. (Class I, Level A) Surgical ablation for AF can be performed without additional operative risk of mortality or major morbidity, and is recommended at the time of concomitant isolated aortic valve replacement, isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and aortic valve replacement plus coronary artery bypass graft operations to restore sinus rhythm. (Class I, Level B nonrandomized) Surgical ablation for symptomatic AF in the absence of structural heart disease that is refractory to class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter-based therapy or both is reasonable as a primary stand-alone procedure, to restore sinus rhythm. (Class IIA, Level B randomized) Surgical ablation for symptomatic persistent or longstanding persistent AF in the absence of structural heart disease is reasonable, as a stand-alone procedure using the Cox-Maze III/IV lesion set compared with pulmonary vein isolation alone. (Class IIA, Level B nonrandomized) Surgical ablation for symptomatic AF in the setting of left atrial enlargement (≥4.5 cm) or more than moderate mitral regurgitation by pulmonary vein isolation alone is not recommended. (Class III no benefit, Level C expert opinion) It is reasonable to perform left atrial appendage excision or exclusion in conjunction with surgical ablation for AF for longitudinal thromboembolic morbidity prevention. (Class IIA, Level C limited data) At the time of concomitant cardiac operations in patients with AF, it is reasonable to surgically manage the left atrial appendage for longitudinal thromboembolic morbidity prevention. (Class IIA, Level C expert opinion) In the treatment of AF, multidisciplinary heart team assessment, treatment planning, and long-term follow-up can be useful and beneficial to optimize patient outcomes.


Posted December 15th 2016

From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation: Treatment targets for plaque psoriasis.

Caitriona Ryan, M.D.

Caitriona Ryan, M.D.

Armstrong, A. W., M. P. Siegel, J. Bagel, E. E. Boh, M. Buell, K. D. Cooper, K. Callis Duffin, L. F. Eichenfield, A. Garg, J. M. Gelfand, A. B. Gottlieb, J. Y. Koo, N. J. Korman, G. G. Krueger, M. G. Lebwohl, C. L. Leonardi, A. M. Mandelin, M. A. Menter, J. F. Merola, D. M. Pariser, R. B. Prussick, C. Ryan, K. N. Shah, J. M. Weinberg, M. O. Williams, J. J. Wu, P. S. Yamauchi and A. S. Van Voorhees (2016). “From the medical board of the national psoriasis foundation: Treatment targets for plaque psoriasis.” J Am Acad Dermatol: 2016 Nov [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: An urgent need exists in the United States to establish treatment goals in psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: We aim to establish defined treatment targets toward which clinicians and patients with psoriasis can strive to inform treatment decisions, reduce disease burden, and improve outcomes in practice. METHODS: The National Psoriasis Foundation conducted a consensus-building study among psoriasis experts using the Delphi method. The process consisted of: (1) literature review, (2) pre-Delphi question selection and input from general dermatologists and patients, and (3) 4 Delphi rounds. RESULTS: A total of 25 psoriasis experts participated in the Delphi process. The most preferred instrument was body surface area (BSA). The most preferred time for evaluating patient response after starting new therapies was at 3 months. The acceptable response at 3 months postinitiation was either BSA 3% or less or BSA improvement 75% or less from baseline. The target response at 3 months postinitiation was BSA 1% or less. During the maintenance period, evaluation every 6 months was most preferred. The target response at every 6 months maintenance evaluation is BSA 1% or less. LIMITATIONS: Although BSA is feasible in practice, it does not encompass health-related quality of life, costs, and risks of side effects. CONCLUSION: With defined treatment targets, clinicians and patients can regularly evaluate treatment responses and perform benefit-risk assessments of therapeutic options individualized to the patient.


Posted December 15th 2016

Efficacy of Secukinumab on Moderate-to-severe Plaque Psoriasis Affecting Different Body Regions: a Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Studies.

Alan M. Menter M.D.

Alan M. Menter M.D.

Menter, A., J. C. Cather, M. Jarratt, X. Meng, A. Guana and J. Nyirady (2016). “Efficacy of secukinumab on moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis affecting different body regions: A pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies.” Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 6(4): 639-647.

Full text of this article.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of psoriasis varies with the body region affected. In addition, patients have different perceptions of disease improvement and treatment satisfaction based on the location of skin clearance with treatment. The monoclonal antibody secukinumab selectively targets interleukin-17A-a central cytokine of psoriasis-and provides rapid and sustained clearance for moderate-to-severe psoriasis affecting all body regions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of secukinumab on moderate-to-severe psoriasis affecting the trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. METHODS: Data were pooled from four phase 3 studies. To be included in the analysis for each body region, patients were required to have a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score >/=12 for that body region and psoriasis covering >/=10% of the surface area of that region. Secukinumab was administered at Baseline, Weeks 1, 2 and 3, and then every 4 weeks from Week 4 to 48. RESULTS: Across the trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, initial PASI subscore responses were sustained to Week 52. At Week 52, trunk (T) PASI 90/100 responses were achieved by 78.4%/71.1% of patients receiving secukinumab 300 mg, respectively, and by 66.3%/56.9% of patients receiving secukinumab 150 mg, respectively. At Week 52, upper limb (UL) PASI 90/100 responses were achieved by 67.3%/59.1% of patients receiving secukinumab 300 mg, respectively, and by 50.3%/43.3% of patients receiving secukinumab 150 mg, respectively. At Week 52, lower limb (LL) PASI 90/100 responses were achieved by 63.9%/55.3% of patients receiving secukinumab 300 mg, respectively, and by 45.1%/36.4% of patients receiving secukinumab 150 mg, respectively. A 50% reduction in mean PASI subscore occurred after 2.8, 2.9, and 3.4 weeks with secukinumab 300 mg on the trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs, respectively. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab provided robust and sustained efficacy for moderate-to-severe psoriasis affecting the trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs.