Alan Jones M.D.

Posted March 2nd 2021

A Community Orthopaedic Residency Approach to Education and Training During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

D. Alan Jones, M.D.

D. Alan Jones, M.D.

Oguayo, C.C., Chu, J. and Jones, A.L. (2021). “A Community Orthopaedic Residency Approach to Education and Training During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 5(1).

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has rapidly affected all facets of everyday life including the practice of medicine. Hospital systems and medical practices have evolved to protect patients, physicians, and staff and conserve personal protective equipment and resources. Orthopaedic practices have been specifically affected by social distancing and stay at home guidelines, limiting in-office practice and elective surgery restrictions. This, in turn, has had an effect on resident education. Previous literature has been published regarding how academic programs have adjusted to these changes. However, the effects on smaller orthopaedic residencies with nonacademic faculty has not been discussed. The orthopaedic residency at Baylor University Medical Center of Dallas is a fifteen-resident program with a combination of hospital employed and private practice faculty. We adjusted our resident education in mid-March 2020 to keep residents safe while trying to maximize surgical and clinical education and outside research. GOALS: Our goals were to come up with a plan allowed for continuing high-level patient care and resident education while protecting residents and limiting burnout. MODEL: We devised a four-team system with five-day call periods. Interactions between teams were strictly minimized. We also moved to a web-based academic curriculum and devised a system for safe resident participation in surgical cases. The model has been adjusted based on attending and resident feedback. CONCLUSION: Until we develop effective treatments or vaccination for COVID-19, there is a possibility that it will be an ongoing threat. Resident education must also adapt to the changing environment while continuing to provide residents safe opportunities for patient care, didactic education, and research. We believe we have come up with a sustainable, adaptable model for resident education during this challenging time.


Posted September 20th 2020

Femoral derotation osteotomy improves hip and spine function in patients with increased or decreased femoral torsion.

Munif Hatem, M.D.

Munif Hatem, M.D.

Hatem, M., Khoury, A.N., Richard, E.L., Jones, A.L. and Martin, H.D. (2020). “Femoral derotation osteotomy improves hip and spine function in patients with increased or decreased femoral torsion.” Arthroscopy Aug 20;S0749-8063(20)30686-1. [Epub ahead of print.].

Full text of this article.

To evaluate the outcomes of proximal femoral derotation osteotomy (PFDO) on the hip and spine function of patients with abnormal femoral torsion METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent PFDO to treat increased or decreased femoral torsion between July of 2014 and February of 2019. The exclusion criteria were: previous fracture, fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis or osteotomy in the ipsilateral femur; PFDO associated to varus or valgus osteotomy; Tönnis grade 2 or 3 osteoarthritis; and PFDO performed to treat knee abnormalities. Hip function was assessed through the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). A subgroup of consecutive patients with low back pain before the PFDO and operated after 2017 had the spine function assessed through the Oswestry disability index (ODI) RESULTS: A total of 37 hips (34 patients) were studied: 15 hips with increased femoral torsion and 22 with decreased femoral torsion. Eight patients were male and 26 female. The average age at PFDO was 33 years (range, 15 to 54 years). At a mean follow-up of 24 months (range, 12 to 65 months), the mean mHHS improved from 58.1 ± 14.3 before PFDO to 82 ± 15.6 at the most recent follow-up (p<0.001). Improvement in the mHHS above the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was observed in 33 hips (89%). In the subgroup of 14 consecutive patients with ODI available, the ODI improved from a mean of 45% ± 16% before the PFDO to 22% ± 17% at the most recent follow-up (p=0.001). Nine (64.3%) of the 14 patients presented improvement in the ODI above the MCID. Revision procedure with a larger intramedullary nail was necessary in two hips to treat nonunion CONCLUSION: Proximal femoral derotation osteotomy improves the hip and spine function in patients with increased or decreased femoral torsion and non-arthritic hips.


Posted March 15th 2020

Psychological morbidity and functional impairment following traumatic pelvic injury.

Ann M. Warren Ph.D.
Ann M. Warren Ph.D.

McMinn, K. R., E. V. Thomas, K. R. Martin, J. N. Khetan, E. E. McShan, M. M. Bennett, J. Solis, A. L. Jones, M. B. Powers and A. M. Warren (2020). “Psychological morbidity and functional impairment following traumatic pelvic injury.” Injury Feb 11. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

Pelvic injuries often result from high-energy trauma and lead to significant functional impairment. While the physical outcomes of these injuries have been widely studied, the psychological consequences remain largely unexplored. The purpose of this study was to examine psychosocial and functional outcomes of patients with pelvic trauma in the year after injury. The sample (N=32) consisted of adult patients with traumatic pelvic injures, as defined by ICD-9 codes, who were admitted to a Level I Trauma Center for at least 24 h. Participants were primarily female (53%) with a mean age of 48.7 years (SD=17.9). Demographic, injury-related, and psychosocial data (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, alcohol use, quality of life, pain, return to work) were gathered at the time of hospitalization as well as at 3-, 6-, and 12 month follow-ups. Mixed regression models were used to examine the outcome variables over time. There were significant decreases in pain and alcohol use at each follow-up compared to baseline. However, despite the decrease, the levels of pain and alcohol use remained high. Physical and mental health also decreased significantly, indicating worsened functioning and lowered quality of life. Neither PTSD nor depression changed significantly over time, indicating that participants’ symptoms were not likely to improve. These data suggest that sustaining a traumatic pelvic injury increases the risk of diminished quality of life, both mentally and physically. Even one-year post-injury, participants experienced moderate physical pain and higher levels of PTSD, depression, and problematic alcohol use than would be expected in the general population. These findings highlight the need for an interdisciplinary approach to treating patients with pelvic injuries, including psychological screening and intervention in acute care and throughout recovery.


Posted September 15th 2017

Prospective Evaluation of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression in Orthopaedic Injury Patients With and Without Concomitant Traumatic Brain Injury.

Ann M. Warren Ph.D.

Ann M. Warren Ph.D.

Roden-Foreman, K., J. Solis, A. Jones, M. Bennett, J. W. Roden-Foreman, E. E. Rainey, M. L. Foreman and A. M. Warren (2017). “Prospective evaluation of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression in orthopaedic injury patients with and without concomitant traumatic brain injury.” J Orthop Trauma 31(9): e275-e280.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVES: Psychological morbidities after injury [eg, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression] are increasingly recognized as a significant determinant of overall outcome. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) negatively impacts outcomes of patients with orthopaedic injury, but the association of concurrent TBI, orthopaedic injury, and symptoms of PTSD and depression has not been examined. This study’s objective was to examine symptoms of PTSD and depression in patients with orthopaedic trauma with and without TBI. DESIGN: Longitudinal prospective cohort study. SETTING: Urban Level I Trauma Center in the Southwest United States. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Orthopaedic trauma patients older than 18 years admitted for >/=24 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Questionnaires examining demographics, injury-related variables, PTSD, and depression were administered during hospitalization and 3, 6, and 12 months later. Orthopaedic injury and TBI were determined based on ICD-9 codes. Generalized linear models determined whether PTSD and depression at follow-up were associated with TBI. RESULTS: Of the total sample (N = 214), 44 (21%) sustained a TBI. Those with TBI had higher rates of PTSD symptoms, 12 months postinjury (P = 0.04). The TBI group also had higher rates of depressive symptoms, 6 months postinjury (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Having a TBI in addition to orthopaedic injury was associated with significantly higher rates of PTSD at 12 months and depression at 6 months postinjury. This suggests that sustaining a TBI in addition to orthopaedic injury places patients at a higher risk for negative psychological outcomes. The findings of this study may help clinicians to identify patients who are in need for psychological screening and could potentially benefit from intervention.