Jeffrey M. Schussler M.D.

Chalkley, R. A., W. C. Roberts, S. Patlolla, J. M. Schussler, R. W. Snyder, 2nd, R. L. Smith, 2nd, C. S. Roberts and D. M. Meyer (2020). “Giant Right Coronary Artery Aneurysms.” Am J Cardiol 125(10): 1599-1601.

Full text of this article.

Described herein are 2 adults with right coronary artery aneurysms measuring ≥4.0 cm in maximal diameter. Each aneurysm contained huge intra-aneurysm thrombus and each coronary artery contained atherosclerotic plaques diffusely. Each aneurysm was resected without complication and each patient has resumed preoperative level of activities without limitations.

Rosol, Z. P., K. F. Kopecky, B. R. Minehart, K. M. Tecson, A. Vasudevan, P. A. McCullough, P. A. Grayburn and J. M. Schussler (2020). “Limitations of transoesophageal echocardiogram in acute ischaemic stroke.” Open Heart 7(1): e001176.

Full text of this article.

Objective: The role of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in identifying ischaemic stroke aetiology is debated. In 2018, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) issued class IIa recommendation for echocardiography, with the qualifying statement of use in cases where it will alter management. Hence, we sought to determine the rate at which TOE findings altered management in cases of confirmed ischaemic stroke. Methods: We retrospectively analysed TOE cases with confirmed ischaemic stroke at our centre between April 2015 and February 2017. We defined a change in management as the initiation of anticoagulation therapy, antibiotic therapy or patent foramen ovale closure as a direct result of TOE findings. Results: There were 185 patients included in this analysis; 19 (10%) experienced a change in management. However, only 7 of the 19 (4% of all subjects) experienced a change in management due to TOE findings. The remaining 12 were initiated on oral antigoagulation as a result of discoveries during routine workup, mainly atrial fibrillation on telemetry monitoring. Conclusions: This work suggests an overuse of TOE and provides support for the 2018 AHA/ASA stroke guidelines, which recommend against the routine use of echocardiography in the work up of cerebrovascular accident due to a cardioembolic source.

Szerlip, M., S. Anwaruddin, H. D. Aronow, M. G. Cohen, M. J. Daniels, P. Dehghani, D. E. Drachman, S. Elmariah, D. N. Feldman, S. Garcia, J. Giri, P. Kaul, N. Kapur, D. J. Kumbhani, P. M. Meraj, B. Morray, K. R. Nayak, S. A. Parikh, R. Sakhuja, J. M. Schussler, A. Seto, B. Shah, R. V. Swaminathan, D. A. Zidar and S. S. Naidu (2020). “Considerations for Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic Perspectives from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Emerging Leader Mentorship (SCAI ELM) Members and Graduates.” Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Mar 25. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

The COVID-19 pandemic will impact many patients we care for with cardiovascular
disease. The preparedness of healthcare providers is critical in providing the best quality of care with soon to be limited resources, while keeping all personnel as safe as possible. The current key elements include 1) rescheduling of all non-urgent, elective CCL procedures, 2) careful patient selection for urgent and emergent CCL procedures with recognition of potential shifts in risk/benefit ratios in the setting of a highly contagious virus, 3) meticulous donning and doffing of PPE along with cleaning of CCL areas, 4) performance of bedside procedures when possible, and 5) staffing modifications to limit infectivity and preserve staff availability. (Excerpt from text, no abstract available)

Vasudevan, A., J. W. Choi, G. A. Feghali, A. Y. Kluger, S. R. Lander, K. M. Tecson, M. Sathyamoorthy, J. M. Schussler, R. C. Stoler, R. C. Vallabhan, C. E. Velasco, A. Yoon and P. A. McCullough (2019). “First and recurrent events after percutaneous coronary intervention: implications for survival analyses.” Scand Cardiovasc J 53(6): 299-304.

Full text of this article.

Objectives. Using composite endpoints and/or only first events in clinical research result in information loss and alternative statistical methods which incorporate recurrent event data exist. We compared information-loss under traditional analyses to alternative models. Design. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (Jan2010-Dec2014) and constructed Cox models for a composite endpoint (readmission/death), a shared frailty model for recurrent events, and a joint frailty (JF) model to simultaneously account for recurrent and terminal events and evaluated the impact of heart failure (HF) on the outcome. Results. Among 4901 patients, 2047(41.8%) experienced a readmission or death within 1 year. Of those with recurrent events, 60% had >/=1 readmission and 6% had >4; a total of 121(2.5%) patients died during follow-up. The presence of HF conferred an adjusted Hazard ratio (HR) of 1.32 (95% CI: 1.18-1.47, p < .001) for the risk of composite endpoint (Cox model), 1.44 (95% CI: 1.36-1.52, p < .001) in the frailty model, and 1.34 (95% CI:1.22-1.46, p < .001) in the JF model. However, HF was not associated with death (HR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.52-1.48, p = .61) in the JF model. Conclusions. Using a composite endpoint and/or only the first event yields substantial loss of information, as many individuals endure >1 event. JF models reduce bias by simultaneously providing event-specific HRs for recurrent and terminal events.

Vasudevan, A., J. W. Choi, G. A. Feghali, S. R. Lander, L. Jialiang, J. M. Schussler, R. C. Stoler, R. C. Vallabhan, C. E. Velasco and P. A. McCullough (2019). “Event dependence in the analysis of cardiovascular readmissions postpercutaneous coronary intervention.” J Investig Med 67(6): 943-949.

Full text of this article.

Recurrent hospitalizations are common in longitudinal studies; however, many forms of cumulative event analyses assume recurrent events are independent. We explore the presence of event dependence when readmissions are spaced apart by at least 30 and 60 days. We set up a comparative framework with the assumption that patients with emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) will be at higher risk for recurrent cardiovascular readmissions than those with elective procedures. A retrospective study of patients who underwent PCI (January 2008-December 2012) with their follow-up information obtained from a regional database for hospitalization was conducted. Conditional gap time (CG), frailty gamma (FG) and conditional frailty models (CFM) were constructed to evaluate the dependence of events. Relative bias (%RB) in point estimates using CFM as the reference was calculated for comparison of the models. Among 4380 patients, emergent cases were at higher risk as compared with elective cases for recurrent events in different statistical models and time-spaced data sets, but the magnitude of HRs varied across the models (adjusted HR [95% CI]: all readmissions [unstructured data]-CG 1.16 [1.09 to 1.22], FG 1.45 [1.33 to 1.57], CFM 1.24 [1.16 to 1.32]; 30-day spaced-CG1.14 [1.08 to 1.21], FG 1.28 [1.17 to 1.39], CFM 1.17 [1.10 to 1.26]; and 60-day spaced-CG 1.14 [1.07 to 1.22], FG 1.23 [1.13 to 1.34] CFM 1.18 [1.09 to 1.26]). For all of the time-spaced readmissions, we found that the values of %RB were closer to the conditional models, suggesting that event dependence dominated the data despite attempts to create independence by increasing the space in time between admissions. Our analysis showed that independent of the intercurrent event duration, prior events have an influence on future events. Hence, event dependence should be accounted for when analyzing recurrent events and challenges contemporary methods for such analysis.