Joyce O'Shaughnessy M.D.

Peterson, D. E., J. A. O’Shaughnessy, H. S. Rugo, S. Elad, M. M. Schubert, C. T. Viet, C. Campbell-Baird, J. Hronek, V. Seery, J. Divers, J. Glaspy, B. L. Schmidt and T. F. Meiller (2016). “Oral mucosal injury caused by mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors: Emerging perspectives on pathobiology and impact on clinical practice.” Cancer Med. 2016 June [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

In recent years oral mucosal injury has been increasingly recognized as an important toxicity associated with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, including in patients with breast cancer who are receiving everolimus. This review addresses the state-of-the-science regarding mTOR inhibitor-associated stomatitis (mIAS), and delineates its clinical characteristics and management. Given the clinically impactful pain associated with mIAS, this review also specifically highlights new research focusing on the study of the molecular basis of pain. The incidence of mIAS varies widely (2-78%). As reported across multiple mTOR inhibitor clinical trials, grade 3/4 toxicity occurs in up to 9% of patients. Managing mTOR-associated oral lesions with topical oral, intralesional, and/or systemic steroids can be beneficial, in contrast to the lack of evidence supporting steroid treatment of oral mucositis caused by high-dose chemotherapy or radiation. However, steroid management is not uniformly efficacious in all patients receiving mTOR inhibitors. Furthermore, technology does not presently exist to permit clinicians to predict a priori which of their patients will develop these lesions. There thus remains a strategic need to define the pathobiology of mIAS, the molecular basis of pain, and risk prediction relative to development of the clinical lesion. This knowledge could lead to novel future interventions designed to more effectively prevent mIAS and improve pain management if clinically significant mIAS lesions develop.

Krekow, L. K., B. A. Hellerstedt, R. P. Collea, S. Papish, S. M. Diggikar, R. Resta, S. J. Vukelja, F. A. Holmes, P. K. Reddy, L. Asmar, Y. Wang, P. S. Fox, S. R. Peck and J. O’Shaughnessy (2016). “Incidence and predictive factors for recovery of ovarian function in amenorrheic women in their 40s treated with letrozole.” J Clin Oncol 34(14): 1594-1600.

Full text of this article.

PURPOSE: This prospective study assessed the impact of 2 years of aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy on the incidence of ovarian function recovery (OFR) in women age 40 to 49 with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who were premenopausal at diagnosis and who underwent chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea during adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women age 40 to 49 with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who had ceased menstruating with adjuvant cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy, had postmenopausal serum estradiol (E2), and had received tamoxifen for >/= 1 year were treated with letrozole (2.5 mg) daily for >/= 2 years. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and E2 were measured at baseline and over 2 years. A general linear model was used to assess serial FSH by OFR. Logistic regression was used to assess baseline predictors and OFR. RESULTS: The study enrolled 177 women (145 women age 45 to 49 years and 32 women age 40 to 44 years). Of 173 evaluable patients, 67 (39%; 95% CI, 31% to 46%) regained ovarian function; 11 of these patients (6%; 95% CI, 3% to 10%) resumed menses, and 56 of these patients (32%; 95% CI, 25% to 39%) developed premenopausal E2 without menses. Among AI-naive patients, serial FSH significantly increased over time (P < .001), did not vary significantly by OFR status (P = .55), but showed mild evidence of a decrease after month 12 for those who resumed menses (P = .0989). Age less than 45 years and inhibin B were significant multivariable baseline predictors of OFR. CONCLUSION: These results emphasize the challenge in determining definitive menopause in women with chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea. The risk of OFR during treatment with AIs in amenorrheic women in their 40s is high, and AI therapy should be avoided in these patients.

Liu, M. C., J. Cortes and J. O’Shaughnessy (2016). “Challenges in the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases.” Cancer Metastasis Rev. Mar 29. [Epub ahead of print]

Full text of this article.

Brain metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality for women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, yet little is known about the optimal treatment of brain disease in this group of patients. Although these patients are at lower risk for brain metastases relative to those with HER2-positive and triple-negative disease, they comprise the majority of women diagnosed with breast cancer. Surgery and radiation continue to have a role in the treatment of brain metastases, but there is a dearth of effective systemic therapies due to the poor penetrability of many systemic drugs across the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Additionally, patients with brain metastases have long been excluded from clinical trials, and few studies have been conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of systemic therapies specifically for the treatment of HER2-negative breast cancer brain metastases. New approaches are on the horizon, such as nanoparticle-based cytotoxic drugs that have the potential to cross the BBB and provide clinically meaningful benefits to patients with this life-threatening consequence of HR-positive breast cancer.

Krekow, L. K., B. A. Hellerstedt, R. P. Collea, S. Papish, S. M. Diggikar, R. Resta, S. J. Vukelja, F. A. Holmes, P. K. Reddy, L. Asmar, Y. Wang, P. S. Fox, S. R. Peck and J. O’Shaughnessy (2016). “Incidence and Predictive Factors for Recovery of Ovarian Function in Amenorrheic Women in Their 40s Treated With Letrozole.” J Clin Oncol. Feb 16. [Epub ahead of print]

Full text of this article.

PURPOSE: This prospective study assessed the impact of 2 years of aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy on the incidence of ovarian function recovery (OFR) in women age 40 to 49 with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who were premenopausal at diagnosis and who underwent chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea during adjuvant treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women age 40 to 49 with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who had ceased menstruating with adjuvant cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy, had postmenopausal serum estradiol (E2), and had received tamoxifen for >/= 1 year were treated with letrozole (2.5 mg) daily for >/= 2 years. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and E2 were measured at baseline and over 2 years. A general linear model was used to assess serial FSH by OFR. Logistic regression was used to assess baseline predictors and OFR. RESULTS: The study enrolled 177 women (145 women age 45 to 49 years and 32 women age 40 to 44 years). Of 173 evaluable patients, 67 (39%; 95% CI, 31% to 46%) regained ovarian function; 11 of these patients (6%; 95% CI, 3% to 10%) resumed menses, and 56 of these patients (32%; 95% CI, 25% to 39%) developed premenopausal E2 without menses. Among AI-naive patients, serial FSH significantly increased over time (P < .001), did not vary significantly by OFR status (P = .55), but showed mild evidence of a decrease after month 12 for those who resumed menses (P = .0989). Age less than 45 years and inhibin B were significant multivariable baseline predictors of OFR. CONCLUSION: These results emphasize the challenge in determining definitive menopause in women with chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea. The risk of OFR during treatment with AIs in amenorrheic women in their 40s is high, and AI therapy should be avoided in these patients.

Smith, J. W., 2nd, S. Vukelja, A. D. Hoffman, V. E. Jones, K. McIntyre, E. Berrak, J. X. Song and J. O’Shaughnessy (2016). “Phase II, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Feasibility Study of Eribulin Combined With Capecitabine for Adjuvant Treatment in Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Early-Stage Breast Cancer.” Clin Breast Cancer 16(1): 31-37.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: The present phase II, open-label, multicenter study explored the feasibility, safety, and tolerability of eribulin, a novel non-taxane microtubule inhibitor, plus capecitabine as adjuvant therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with early-stage, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, estrogen-receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer received four 21-day cycles of treatment with eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each cycle) combined with capecitabine (900 mg/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1-14 of each cycle [standard schedule] or 1500 mg orally twice daily using a 7-days on/7-days off schedule [weekly schedule]). Feasibility was determined by the relative dose intensity (RDI) of the combination using prespecified criteria for 80% of patients achieving an RDI of >/= 85%, with a lower 95% confidence boundary > 70%. RESULTS: The mean RDI was 90.6%, and the feasibility rate was 81.3% among women (n = 67, mean age, 61.3 years) receiving the standard schedule and 95.6% and 100% among women (n = 10, mean age 62.3 years) receiving the weekly schedule. Dose reductions, missed doses, and withdrawals due to adverse events (most commonly hand-foot syndrome) ascribed to capecitabine led to a higher RDI (93.5% vs. 87.8%) and feasibility rate (82.8% vs. 71.9%) for eribulin than for capecitabine using the standard dosing schedule. The most common adverse events were alopecia and fatigue. CONCLUSION: Eribulin plus capecitabine with standard or weekly dosing schedules is feasible in patients with early-stage, HER2-negative, ER-positive breast cancer. Full-dose eribulin (1.4 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) with capecitabine (1500 mg orally twice daily, 7 days on/7 days off) is recommended as a regimen for further evaluation.