Kristen M. Tecson Ph.D.

Posted October 31st 2020

Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients Presenting With COVID-19 and ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Anas Hamadeh, M.D.

Anas Hamadeh, M.D.

Hamadeh, A., Aldujeli, A., Briedis, K., Tecson, K.M., Sanz-Sánchez, J., Al Dujeili, M., Al-Obeidi, A., Diez, J.L., Žaliūnas, R., Stoler, R.C. and McCullough, P.A. (2020). “Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients Presenting With COVID-19 and ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.” Am J Cardiol 131: 1-6.

Full text of this article.

There is limited information regarding clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) disease presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In this multicenter retrospective study, we reviewed charts of patients admitted with symptomatic COVID-19 infection and STEMI to a total of 4 hospitals spanning Italy, Lithuania, Spain and Iraq from February 1, 2020 to April 15, 2020. A total of 78 patients were included in this study, 49 (63%) of whom were men, with a median age of 65 [58, 71] years, and high comorbidity burden. During hospitalization, 8 (10%) developed acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 14 (18%) required mechanical ventilation. 19 (24%) patients were treated with primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and 59 (76%) were treated with fibrinolytic therapy. 13 (17%) patients required cardiac resuscitation, and 9 (11%) died. For the 19 patients treated with primary PCI, 8 (42%) required intubation and 8 (42%) required cardiac resuscitation; stent thrombosis occurred in 4 patients (21%). A total of 5 patients (26%) died during hospitalization. 50 (85%) of the 59 patients initially treated with fibrinolytic therapy had successful fibrinolysis. The median time to reperfusion was 27 minutes [20, 34]. Hemorrhagic stroke occurred in 5 patients (9%). Six patients (10%) required invasive mechanical ventilation; 5 (9%) required cardiac resuscitation, and 4 (7%) died. In conclusion, this is the largest case series to-date of COVID-19 positive patients presenting with STEMI and spans 4 countries. We found a high rate of stent thrombosis, indicating a possible need to adapt STEMI management for COVID-19 patients.


Posted May 15th 2020

Impact of Durable Ventricular Assist Device Support on Outcomes of Patients with Congenital Heart Disease Waiting for Heart Transplant.

Peter McCullough, M.D.

Peter McCullough, M.D.

Cedars, A., K. M. Tecson, A. N. Zaidi, A. Lorts and P. A. McCullough (2020). “Impact of Durable Ventricular Assist Device Support on Outcomes of Patients with Congenital Heart Disease Waiting for Heart Transplant.” Asaio j 66(5): 513-519.

Full text of this article.

The number of congenital heart disease (CHD) patients with heart failure is expanding. These patients have a high probability of dying while awaiting heart transplant. The potential for durable ventricular assist devices (VAD) to improve waiting list survival in CHD is unknown. We conducted an analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database for the primary outcome of death or delisting due to clinical worsening while listed for heart transplant. We compared CHD patients with non-CHD patients matched for listing status. Multivariable models were constructed to account for confounding variables. Congenital heart disease patients were less likely to have a VAD and were more likely to experience the primary outcome of death or delisting due to clinical worsening compared to non-CHD patients. Ventricular assist devices decreased the probability of experiencing the primary outcome for non-CHD but not for CHD patients with a final listing status of 1A. Ventricular assist devices increased the probability of experiencing the primary outcome among CHD patients for those with a final listing status of 1B with no impact in non-CHD patients. Among non-CHD patients who died or were delisted, the time to the primary outcome was delayed by VAD, with a similar trend in CHD. Except for patients with a final listing status of 1B, VAD does not adversely affect waiting list outcomes in CHD patients listed for heart transplant. Ventricular assist devices may prolong waiting list survival among high-risk CHD patients.


Posted April 18th 2020

Limitations of transoesophageal echocardiogram in acute ischaemic stroke

Jeffrey M. Schussler M.D.

Jeffrey M. Schussler M.D.

Rosol, Z. P., K. F. Kopecky, B. R. Minehart, K. M. Tecson, A. Vasudevan, P. A. McCullough, P. A. Grayburn and J. M. Schussler (2020). “Limitations of transoesophageal echocardiogram in acute ischaemic stroke.” Open Heart 7(1): e001176.

Full text of this article.

Objective: The role of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in identifying ischaemic stroke aetiology is debated. In 2018, the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) issued class IIa recommendation for echocardiography, with the qualifying statement of use in cases where it will alter management. Hence, we sought to determine the rate at which TOE findings altered management in cases of confirmed ischaemic stroke. Methods: We retrospectively analysed TOE cases with confirmed ischaemic stroke at our centre between April 2015 and February 2017. We defined a change in management as the initiation of anticoagulation therapy, antibiotic therapy or patent foramen ovale closure as a direct result of TOE findings. Results: There were 185 patients included in this analysis; 19 (10%) experienced a change in management. However, only 7 of the 19 (4% of all subjects) experienced a change in management due to TOE findings. The remaining 12 were initiated on oral antigoagulation as a result of discoveries during routine workup, mainly atrial fibrillation on telemetry monitoring. Conclusions: This work suggests an overuse of TOE and provides support for the 2018 AHA/ASA stroke guidelines, which recommend against the routine use of echocardiography in the work up of cerebrovascular accident due to a cardioembolic source.


Posted March 15th 2020

A population health dietary intervention for African American adults with chronic kidney disease: The Fruit and Veggies for Kidney Health randomized study.

Donald E. Wesson, M.D.
Donald E. Wesson, M.D.

Wesson, D. E., H. Kitzman, A. Montgomery, A. Mamun, W. Parnell, B. Vilayvanh, K. M. Tecson and P. Allison (2020). “A population health dietary intervention for African American adults with chronic kidney disease: The Fruit and Veggies for Kidney Health randomized study.” Contemp Clin Trials Commun March 1. Volume 17, Article 100540.

Full text of this article.

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is commonly asymptomatic until its late stages, reduces life quality and length, is costly to manage, and is disproportionately prevalent in low-income, African American (AA) communities. Traditional health system strategies that engage only patients with symptomatic CKD limit opportunities to prevent progression to end stage kidney disease (ESKD) with the need for expensive kidney replacement therapy and to reduce risk for their major mortality cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD). Published studies show that giving fruits and vegetables (F&V) to AA with early-stage CKD along with preparation instructions slowed CKD progression. This effective, evidenced-based, and potentially scalable dietary intervention might be a component of a community-based strategy to prevent CKD progression. Design: This study supported by NIH grant (R21DK113440) will test the feasibility of an innovative screening strategy conducted at community-based institutions in low-income AA communities and the ability to intervene in individuals identified to have CKD and increased CVD risk with F&V, with or without preparation instructions. Objectives: The study will prospectively compare changes in urine indices predictive of CKD progression and CVD in participants receiving, compared to those not receiving, preparation instructions along with F&V, six months after the intervention. Discussion: Addressing the challenge of increasing progression of early to more advanced stages of CKD with its increased CVD risk requires development of effective strategies to screen, identify, and intervene with individuals found to have CKD with effective, comparatively inexpensive, community-based, and scalable strategies to prevent CKD progression, particularly in low-income, AA communities.


Posted January 15th 2020

The Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Peter McCullough M.D.
Peter McCullough M.D.

Lo, K. B., F. Gul, P. Ram, A. Y. Kluger, K. M. Tecson, P. A. McCullough and J. Rangaswami (2020). “The Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Cardiorenal Med 10(1): 1-10.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses demonstrated the benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) primarily on patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), but with questionable efficacy on patients at risk of ASCVD. Additionally, evidence of beneficial cardiorenal outcomes in patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 with the CV outcomes trials remains unclear. Canagliflozin, one of the SGLT2i, has recently been studied in a large randomized controlled trial in diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease. Thus, there is a need to understand the combined outcomes on the population targeted for treatment with SGLT2i as a whole, regardless of ASCVD status. This meta-analysis will therefore assess the efficacy of SGLT2i in cardiovascular and renal outcomes in general, and in patients with eGFR under 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 in particular. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Cochrane databases for randomized, placebo-controlled studies involving SGLT2i. We examined composite cardiovascular outcomes of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarctions, nonfatal stroke, and heart failure hospitalizations. Renal composite outcomes and progression of albuminuria were also analyzed. Pooled relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: The search yielded a total of 252 articles. Four studies were ultimately included in the meta-analysis after exclusion of other irrelevant studies. The pooled RR (95% CI) for the composite cardiovascular outcome was 0.93 (0.87-0.99) with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 167 in the general study population and 0.89 (0.77-1.02) in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The pooled RR for all-cause mortality was 0.9 (0.84-0.97) with NNT = 143. The pooled RR for death from cardiovascular causes alone was 0.89 (0.81-0.99) in the general population and 0.82 (0.62-1.07) in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The pooled RR for heart failure hospitalizations was 0.71 (0.63-0.79) with NNT = 91. With respect to renal outcomes, the pooled RR for the composite renal outcome was 0.63 (0.56-0.71) with NNT = 67; this was true even in patients with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 0.67 (0.59-0.76). Lastly, the pooled RR for progression of albuminuria was 0.80 (0.76-0.84). CONCLUSION: SGLT2i are associated with significantly lower major adverse cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalizations, and all-cause mortality. The evidence is strongest in reducing heart failure hospitalizations. However, the evidence is weaker when it comes to the population subset with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. SGLT2i are also associated with significantly lower adverse renal events, with these effects apparent even in the population with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2.