Marc A. Ward M.D.

Chin, K., Ward, M.A., Meyer, D.M., Sanchez, C.E. and Leeds, S.G. (2022). “Laparoscopic repair of large diaphragmatic hernia after left ventricular assist device implantation followed by orthotopic heart transplantation.” Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 35(1): 101-103.

Full text of this article.

In patients with advanced heart failure and deteriorating clinical status, a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) can be used as a bridge to transplantation or as an alternative to transplantation. An uncommon complication of orthotopic heart transplant or LVADs is diaphragmatic hernia during implantation or explantation of the device. We describe a patient with a diaphragmatic hernia with incarcerated colon and small bowel treated previously with a HeartMate 3 LVAD and subsequent transplantation. This case highlights the need to consider the diagnosis of diaphragmatic hernia based on symptoms after HeartMate 3 implantation and/or subsequent transplantation, as well as the ability to manage these hernias with a minimally invasive laparoscopic approach to minimize postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Ward, M.A., Hasan, S.S., Sanchez, C.E., Whitfield, E.P., Ogola, G.O. and Leeds, S.G. (2021). “Complications Following Robotic Hiatal Hernia Repair Are Higher Compared to Laparoscopy.” J Gastrointest Surg.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: The use of robotic platforms in surgery is becoming increasingly common in both practice and residency training. In this study, we compared the perioperative outcomes between robotic platforms and traditional laparoscopy in paraesophageal hernia repair. METHODS: A retrospective population-based analysis was performed using the National Inpatient Sample for the period of 2010-2015. Adult patients (≥18 years old) who underwent laparoscopic or robotic paraesophageal hernia repairs were included. Weighted multivariable random intercept linear and logistic regression models were used to assess the effects of robotic surgery on patient outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 168,329 patients were included in the study. The overall adjusted rate of complications was significantly higher in patients who underwent robotic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair compared to laparoscopic PEH OR (95% CI) = 1.17 (1.07, 1.27). Specifically, respiratory failure OR (95% CI) = 1.68 (1.37, 2.05) and esophageal perforation OR (95% CI) = 2.19 (1.42, 3.93) were higher in robotic PEH patients. A subset analysis was performed looking at high-volume centers (>20 operations per year), and, although the risk of complications was lower in the high volume centers compared to intermediate volume centers, complication rates were still significantly higher in the robotic surgery group compared to laparoscopic. Overall charges per surgery were significantly higher in the robotic group. CONCLUSION: Robotic PEH repair is associated with significantly more complications compared to laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair even in high-volume centers.

Huynh, P., Konda, V., Sanguansataya, S., Ward, M.A. and Leeds, S.G. (2020). “Mind the Gap: Current Treatment Alternatives for GERD Patients Failing Medical Treatment and Not Ready for a Fundoplication.” Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech Dec 16. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with Barrett esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and significantly impacts quality of life. Medical management is the first line therapy with surgical fundoplication as an alternative therapy. However, a small portion of patients who fail medical therapy are referred for surgical consultation. This creates a “gap” in therapy for those patients dissatisfied with medical therapy but are not getting referred for surgical consultation. Three procedures have been designed to address these patients. These include radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the lower esophageal sphincter, transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), and magnetic sphincter augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Pubmed literature review was conducted of all publications for RFA, TIF, and MSA. Four most common endpoints for the 3 procedures were compared at different intervals of follow-up. These include percent of patients off proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), GERD-HRQL score, DeMeester score, and percent of time with pH <4. A second query was performed for patients treated with PPI and fundoplications to match the same 4 endpoints as a control. RESULTS: Variable freedom from PPI was reported at 1 year for RFA with a weighted mean of 62%, TIF with a weighted mean of 61%, MSA with a weighted mean of 85%, and fundoplications with a weighted mean of 84%. All procedures including PPIs improved quality-of-life scores but were not equal. Fundoplication had the best improvement followed by MSA, TIF, RFA, and PPI, respectively. DeMeester scores are variable after all procedures and PPIs. All MSA studies showed normalization of pH, whereas only 4 of 17 RFA studies and 3 of 11 TIF studies reported normalization of pH. CONCLUSIONS: Our literature review compares 3 rival procedures to treat "gap" patients for gastroesophageal reflux disease with 4 common endpoints. Magnetic sphincter augmentation appears to have the most reproducible and linear outcomes but is the most invasive of the 3 procedures. MSA outcomes most closely mirrors that of fundoplication.

Ward, M.A., Hasan, S.S., Whitfield, E.P., Ogola, G.O. and Leeds, S.G. (2020). “Endoscopic Per-oral Pyloromyotomy for Gastroparesis: Initial Experience and Postoperative Comparison to Predicted Complications Following Laparoscopic Pyloromyotomy as Calculated by the ACS Risk Calculator.” Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech Sep 15. [Epub ahead of print.].

Full text of this article.

INTRODUCTION: Per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP) is a promising new therapy in the treatment of gastroparesis, where the pyloric muscle is cut using an endoscopic tunneling technique. This study was designed to report outcomes from our initial experience and compare the rate of complications to the laparoscopic equivalent using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) risk calculator. METHODS: Patients who underwent POP between August 2018 to May 2019 were prospectively followed in a database approved by the institutional review board. Preoperatively, patients were evaluated objectively with a 4-hour gastric emptying study (GES). Following POP, all patients were invited for repeat GES 3 months postoperatively. The same cohort was entered into the ACS risk calculator using laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LPM) as the selected procedure. Complication risk of LPM was then compared with the actual complication rate of POP. RESULTS: There were 11 patients that met study criteria (median age 52). Sixty-four percent (7/11) of patients agreed to do repeat GES postoperatively. Of those, 6 of 7 (86%) had normal GES (<10% emptying at 4 h) and the mean improvement was 36.4%. All patients were entered into the ACS risk calculator in which LPM (CPT code 43800) was used as a control. The postoperative complication rate was less than the median predicted risk of LPM in all categories including overall complications (0% vs. 10.05%), return to the operating room, (0% vs. 2.68%), and sepsis (0% vs. 1.42%). The rate of readmission (9% vs. 6.29%, P=0.65) was higher in the POP group than LPM predicted. Length of stay for all patients was significantly shorter than predicted (1.8 vs. 4.6 d, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: All POP patients had objective improvement in their GES and 86% had normal GES following this procedure. POP had significantly lower morbidity and reduced length of stay compared with that predicted of the laparoscopic equivalent using the ACS risk calculator.

Ward, M.A., Whitfield, E.P., Hasan, S.S., Ogola, G.O. and Leeds, S.G. (2020). “Objectively Confirmed Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Following Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy Higher in Obese Patients (BMI>30).” Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech Sep 2. [Epub ahead of print.].

Full text of this article.

INTRODUCTION: Per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a promising minimally invasive therapy in the treatment of achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders. A concern surrounding POEM is the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) postoperatively. This study was designed to report outcomes and identify risk factors for the development of postoperative GERD. METHODS: Patients who underwent POEM between January 1, 2015 and December 12, 2019 were prospectively followed in an Institutional Review Board approved database. All patients were invited for a full comprehensive workup 6 months post-POEM including symptom scores, pH testing, manometry and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. In a retrospective review of this database, those who developed postoperative GERD were compared with those who did not. RESULTS: There were 82 patients that met study criteria (median age 59). Indications for POEM include 35 type I achalasia, 16 type II achalasia, 21 type III achalasia and other spastic esophageal motility disorders, and 10 esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Mean Eckardt scores post-POEM were 2.67 compared with 6.79 pre-POEM (P<0.05). Mean integrated relaxation pressure improvement decreased from 27 to 13.1 (P<0.05). The presence of postoperative GERD was defined as an abnormal DeMeester score (>14.7) with pH testing off-medications or the presence of Grade C/D esophagitis on endoscopy. Thirty-five percent (29/82) of patients developed postoperative GERD following POEM. Negative predictive factors for the development of postoperative GERD include myotomy length and normal body mass index (BMI). Obesity (BMI>30) was a positive predictive risk factor in the development of GERD (P=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: POEM provides symptomatic relief and reduced Eckardt scores in patient with achalasia and other esophageal motility disorders. Patients who undergo POEM are at risk for developing gastroesophageal reflux disease especially in obese patients.