Marco Cura M.D.

Posted February 15th 2020

Society of Interventional Radiology Position Statement on the Role of Percutaneous Ablation in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Society of Interventional Oncology.

Marco Cura M.D.
Marco Cura M.D.

Morris, C. S., M. O. Baerlocher, S. R. Dariushnia, E. D. McLoney, N. Abi-Jaoudeh, K. Nelson, M. Cura, A. K. Abdel Aal, J. W. Mitchell, S. Madassery, S. Partovi, T. D. McClure, A. L. Tam and S. Patel (2020). “Society of Interventional Radiology Position Statement on the Role of Percutaneous Ablation in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Society of Interventional Oncology.” J Vasc Interv Radiol 31(2): 189-194.e183.

Full text of this article.

In accordance with multidisciplinary and society guidelines, Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) considers thermal PA to be an acceptable treatment option for stage T1a renal cell carcinoma (RCC) neoplasms (≤4 cm in diameter) in carefully selected patients and can be offered over active surveillance. Perccutaneous ablation (PA) may also have a potential beneficial role to play in the treatment of T1b tumors as well as oligometastatic RCC. However, future research in this area is warranted before strong recommendations can be made. SIR also recommends further investigation directly comparing ablation modalities, as well as comparing PA to surgical therapies with RCTs or other prospective study designs with adherence to standardized reporting of trials. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. In patients with small renal tumors (stage T1a), percutaneous thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment with fewer complications than nephrectomy and acceptable long-term oncological and survival outcomes. (Level of Evidence: C; Strength of Recommendation: Moderate). 2. In selected patients with suspected T1a RCC, percutaneous thermal ablation should be offered over active surveillance. (Level of Evidence: C; Strength of Recommendation: Moderate). 3. Percutaneous biopsy of small renal masses is recommended before or during PA, whenever possible. (Level of Evidence C; Strength of Recommendation: Moderate). 4. In high-risk patients with T1b RCC who are not surgical candidates, percutaneous thermal ablation may be an appropriate treatment option; however, further research in this area is required. (Level of Evidence D; Strength of Recommendation: Weak). 5. PA of oligometastatic RCC may be appropriate in patients with surgically resectable primary RCC who are not candidates for metastasectomy. (Level of Evidence D; Strength of Recommendation: Weak). 6. Radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation, and MW ablation are all appropriate modalities for thermal ablation, and method of ablation should be left to the discretion of the operating physician. (Level of Evidence: D; Strength of Recommendation: Weak). (Excerpt from text, p. 192-193; no abstract available.)


Posted March 15th 2017

Uterine Artery Embolization in a Patient Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Overcoming the Challenge of Retrograde Arterial Flow at the Aortoiliac Bifurcation.

Marco Cura M.D.

Marco Cura M.D.

Lichliter, A. and M. Cura (2017). “Uterine artery embolization in a patient undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Overcoming the challenge of retrograde arterial flow at the aortoiliac bifurcation.” J Vasc Interv Radiol 28(3): 472-475.

Full text of this article.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a modified cardiopulmonary bypass mechanism of life support, has seen extended use and increasing applications over the last 2 decades (1). There are 2 types of ECMO circuits: venoarterial (VA) and venovenous. In VA-ECMO, venous blood is withdrawn from the right atrium or a central vein, pumped through the oxygenator, and returned to the arterial circulation. When oxygenated blood is returned via the femoral artery in VA-ECMO, aortic blood flow is reversed, creating a technical challenge of retrograde flow at the aortoiliac bifurcation (1).