Monica M. Bennett Ph.D.

Posted December 15th 2018

Morphine vs Methadone Treatment for Infants with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

Veeral N. Tolia M.D.

Veeral N. Tolia M.D.

Tolia, V. N., K. Murthy, M. M. Bennett, R. G. Greenberg, D. K. Benjamin, P. B. Smith and R. H. Clark (2018). “Morphine vs Methadone Treatment for Infants with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.” J Pediatr 203: 185-189.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the relationship of initial pharmacotherapy with methadone or morphine and length of stay (LOS) in infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN: From the Pediatrix Clinical Data Warehouse database, we identified all infants born at >/=36 weeks of gestation between 2011 and 2015 who were diagnosed with NAS (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 779.5) and treated with methadone or morphine in the first 7 days of life. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to quantify the association between initial treatment and LOS after adjusting for maternal age, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal drug use, maternal smoking, gestational age, small for gestational age status, inborn status, and discharge year. RESULTS: We identified a total of 7667 eligible infants, including 1187 treated with methadone (15%) and 6480 treated with morphine (85%). Birth weight, gestational age, and sex were similar in the 2 groups. Methadone treatment was associated with a 22% shorter median LOS (18 days [IQR, 11-30 days] vs 23 days [IQR, 16-33]; P < .001) and a 19% shorter median NICU stay (17 days [IQR, 10-29 days] vs 21 days [IQR, 14-36 days]; P < .001). After adjustment, methadone was associated with a shorter LOS (hazard ratio for discharge, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.11-1.37; P < .001) CONCLUSION: Among infants born at >/=36 weeks of gestation with NAS, initial methadone treatment was associated with a shorter LOS compared with morphine treatment. Future prospective comparative effectiveness trials to treat infants with NAS are needed to verify this observation.


Posted November 15th 2018

Impact of a Community-Based Healthy Lifestyle Program on Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Simon Driver Ph.D.

Simon Driver Ph.D.

Driver, S., M. Reynolds, A. Woolsey, L. Callender, P. K. Prajapati, M. Bennett and K. Kramer (2018). “Impact of a Community-Based Healthy Lifestyle Program on Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury.” J Head Trauma Rehabil 33(6): E49-e58.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVES: To examine adherence with and effect of an evidence-based healthy lifestyle intervention modified for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Pre-/postintervention without control. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen individuals with TBI: primarily male (61%), white (67%), with private insurance (50%). Mean age was 45.6 +/- 12.3 years, weight 210 +/- 42.6 lb, and body mass index 31.8 +/- 4.6 (obese category) at baseline. INTERVENTIONS: The primary goal of the Diabetes Prevention Program Group Lifestyle Balance program is 5% to 7% weight loss through increased physical activity and improved dietary behaviors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Adherence (ie, session attendance and self-monitoring of dietary behaviors), physiologic changes (ie, weight loss, blood pressure; waist and arm circumference; and lipid profile), and quality of life (ie, self-reported health, quality of life, and step count). RESULTS: Average participant attendance (85% over 12 months) and self-monitoring (90% over 6 months) were high. Significant decreases were observed in diastolic blood pressure and waist and arm circumference from baseline through 12 months and from baseline to 3 months only for weight and total cholesterol. No significant changes were observed in self-reported health, quality of life, or step count. CONCLUSIONS: Participants demonstrated high adherence with the program, suggesting that individuals with TBI are able to successfully engage in the program and achieve significant weight loss and changes in key physiologic outcomes.


Posted November 15th 2018

Better with age? A comparison of geriatric and non-geriatric trauma patients’ psychological outcomes 6 months post-injury.

Ann M. Warren Ph.D.

Ann M. Warren Ph.D.

Culp, B. L., J. W. Roden-Foreman, E. V. Thomas, E. E. McShan, M. M. Bennett, K. R. Martin, M. B. Powers, M. L. Foreman, L. B. Petrey and A. M. Warren (2018). “Better with age? A comparison of geriatric and non-geriatric trauma patients’ psychological outcomes 6 months post-injury.” Cogn Behav Ther Nov 5: 1-13. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

This is the first study to compare both physical and psychological outcomes in geriatric and non-geriatric patients (n = 268) at baseline and 6 months post-trauma. Demographic, clinical, and psychological data, including screens for alcohol use, depressive symptoms, and post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) were collected from 67 geriatric patients (70.7 +/- 8.0 years) and 201 non-geriatric patients (40.2 +/- 12.8 years) admitted to a Level I trauma center for >/= 24 h. Geriatric patients were significantly less likely to screen positive for alcohol use at baseline, and depression, PTSS, and alcohol use at follow-up. When not controlling for discharge to rehabilitation or nursing facility, geriatric patients had significantly lower odds of alcohol use at follow-up. There was no significant difference in injury severity, resilience, or pre-trauma psychological status between the two groups. Results indicate that geriatric trauma patients fare better than their younger counterparts at 6 months post-trauma on measures of alcohol use, depression, and PTSS. Screenings and interventions for both age groups could improve psychological health post-trauma, but younger patients may require additional attention.


Posted October 15th 2018

https://www.kqed.org/forum/2010101858915/criminologist-franklin-zimring-on-reforming-police-use-of-force

Veeral N. Tolia M.D.

Veeral N. Tolia M.D.

Tolia, V. N., K. Murthy, M. M. Bennett, R. G. Greenberg, D. K. Benjamin, P. B. Smith and R. H. Clark (2018). “Morphine vs Methadone Treatment for Infants with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.” J Pediatr Sep 14. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the relationship of initial pharmacotherapy with methadone or morphine and length of stay (LOS) in infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN: From the Pediatrix Clinical Data Warehouse database, we identified all infants born at >/=36 weeks of gestation between 2011 and 2015 who were diagnosed with NAS (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 779.5) and treated with methadone or morphine in the first 7 days of life. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to quantify the association between initial treatment and LOS after adjusting for maternal age, maternal race/ethnicity, maternal drug use, maternal smoking, gestational age, small for gestational age status, inborn status, and discharge year. RESULTS: We identified a total of 7667 eligible infants, including 1187 treated with methadone (15%) and 6480 treated with morphine (85%). Birth weight, gestational age, and sex were similar in the 2 groups. Methadone treatment was associated with a 22% shorter median LOS (18 days [IQR, 11-30 days] vs 23 days [IQR, 16-33]; P < .001) and a 19% shorter median NICU stay (17 days [IQR, 10-29 days] vs 21 days [IQR, 14-36 days]; P < .001). After adjustment, methadone was associated with a shorter LOS (hazard ratio for discharge, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.11-1.37; P < .001) CONCLUSION: Among infants born at >/=36 weeks of gestation with NAS, initial methadone treatment was associated with a shorter LOS compared with morphine treatment. Future prospective comparative effectiveness trials to treat infants with NAS are needed to verify this observation.


Posted October 15th 2018

Healthcare utilization following spinal cord injury: Objective findings from a regional hospital registry.

Laura B. Petrey M.D.

Laura B. Petrey M.D.

Sikka, S., L. Callender, S. Driver, M. Bennett, M. Reynolds, R. Hamilton, A. M. Warren and L. Petrey (2018). “Healthcare utilization following spinal cord injury: Objective findings from a regional hospital registry.” J Spinal Cord Med Oct 2: 1-7. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose was to describe the prevalence and characteristics of healthcare utilization among individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) from a Level I trauma center. DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis utilizing a local acute trauma registry for initial hospitalization and merged with the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council registry to obtain subsequent health care utilization in the first post-injury year. SETTING: Dallas, TX, USA. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred and sixty four patients were admitted with an acute traumatic SCI from January 2003 through June 2014 to a Level I trauma center. Fifty five patients that expired during initial hospitalization and 18 patients with unspecified SCI (defined by ICD-9 with no etiology or level of injury specified) were not included in the analysis, leaving a final sample of 591. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data included demographic and clinical characteristics, charges, and healthcare utilization. RESULTS: Mean age was 46.1 years (+/-18.9 years), the majority of patients were male (74%), and Caucasian (58%). Of the 591 patients, 345 (58%) had additional inpatient or emergency healthcare utilization accounting for 769 additional visits (median of 3 visits per person). Of the 769 encounters, 534 (69%) were inpatient and 235 (31%) were emergency visits not resulting in an admission. The most prevalent ICD-9 codes listed were pressure ulcer, neurogenic bowel, neurogenic bladder, urinary tract infection, fluid electrolyte imbalance, hypertension, and tobacco use. CONCLUSION: Individuals with SCI experience high levels of healthcare utilization which are costly and may be preventable. Increasing our understanding of the prevalence and causes for healthcare utilization after acute SCI is important to target preventive strategies.