Stevan A. Gonzalez M.D.

Posted August 15th 2016

Predicting renal recovery after liver transplant with severe pretransplant subacute kidney injury: The impact of warm ischemia time.

Stevan A. Gonzalez M.D.
Stevan A. Gonzalez M.D.

Klein, J. A., S. A. Gonzalez, B. V. Fischbach, A. F. Yango, A. Rajagopal, K. M. Rice, M. Saim, Y. M. Barri, L. B. Melton, G. B. Klintmalm and A. Chandrakantan (2016). “Routine ultrasonography surveillance of native kidneys for renal cell carcinoma in kidney transplant candidates.” Clin Transplant 30(8): 946-953.

Full text of this article.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has a high incidence in the kidney transplant population and annual surveillance detects these tumors early in their natural history. Minimal guidelines exist regarding RCC surveillance in ESRD patients awaiting transplant. A retrospective review of our kidney transplant database examined the outcomes of annual ultrasonographic surveillance during initial kidney transplant evaluation and upon annual reassessment. Of 2642 patients listed for transplant, 145 patients were found to have masses during initial kidney transplant evaluation or annual imaging consistent with new complex cystic disease or RCC. A total of 71 patients had RCC identified, with 52 found on initial kidney transplant evaluation and 19 identified on annual surveillance. Male gender and African-American race were independently associated with RCC (P<.05). RCC was detected a median of 2.0 years after listing (two annual ultrasonography studies). Patients with complex cysts were more likely to undergo transplantation (48.7%) compared to patients with RCC (21.1%; P<.001). There was no significant difference in survival between RCC patients and those found to have complex cystic disease, suggesting incidental RCC can be diagnosed early in the natural history and at a curable stage through implementation of a biennial surveillance program.


Posted June 15th 2016

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in the Setting of Cancer Chemotherapy and Other Immunosuppressive Drug Therapy.

Robert P. Perrillo M.D.

Robert P. Perrillo M.D.

Gonzalez, S. A. and R. P. Perrillo (2016). “Hepatitis b virus reactivation in the setting of cancer chemotherapy and other immunosuppressive drug therapy.” Clin Infect Dis 62 Suppl 4: S306-313.

Full text of this article.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) is an important complication of immunosuppressive drug therapy (ISDT). It can occur with active or resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with a clinical spectrum that ranges from mild elevations in liver tests to fulminant hepatic failure. The risk of it occurring is determined by the interplay between HBV serological status, level of viremia, and the immunosuppressive potency of the drug(s) used. Reactivation is most common during treatment of hematologic malignancies but also occurs with chemotherapy for breast cancer and numerous other solid organ malignancies, organ transplant, and immune suppression for nonmalignant conditions. The expansion of new biologic treatments for malignant and nonmalignant disorders has enlarged the population at risk. Increased awareness of HBVr among healthcare providers who prescribe ISDT, adoption of routine HBV screening, and linking the results of screening to antiviral prophylaxis are needed to reduce the incidence of this potentially fatal but preventable disorder.