Medical versus Surgical Treatment for Refractory Heartburn. Reply.

Spechler, S. J. (2020). “Medical versus Surgical Treatment for Refractory Heartburn. Reply.”
New England Journal of Medicine 382(3): 297-298.
Our trial, sponsored by the Department of Veterans Affairs, spanned more than a decade from planning to publication and presented numerous challenges that threatened its successful completion. We agree with Yadlapati and Pandolfino that future RCTs that compare interventional therapies for patients with GERD will encounter similarly daunting obstacles. A rigid requirement for such difficult and expensive RCTs to validate new endosurgical techniques will delay their implementation and may well discourage investigators and their industry partners from developing new devices. On the other hand, there is considerable potential for harm in using invasive treatments whose efficacy is substantiated only by low-quality evidence. Pragmatic yet valid alternatives to RCTs are highly desirable and would facilitate the introduction of sorely needed new treatments for GERD. We also agree with Nicolaides et al. that ensuring patient compliance with PPI dosing is a simple clinical maneuver that works in a substantial minority of patients with PPI-refractory heartburn. Since PPIs bind only to gastric proton pumps that are actively secreting acid, patients should take PPIs 30 to 60 minutes before meals to ensure that the drugs are in the bloodstream when the greatest number of proton pumps are activated by food. Switching PPIs may also be effective, since PPI potencies vary widely, and individual patients can exhibit considerable variability in response to different PPIs. These simple maneuvers can spare many patients the expense, inconvenience, and risk of invasive tests and alternative treatments. Patients in our medical treatment groups were given instructions to avoid lying down for 3 hours after meals and to avoid bedtime snacks. We did not specifically mandate other lifestyle modifications intended to address reflux, such as weight loss, avoidance of foods that may induce heartburn, elevation of the head of the bed, and smoking cessation. The body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) in 86% of our patients with reflux-related heartburn was greater than 25, and we agree with Gardner that there are high-quality data showing that weight loss can ameliorate GERD symptoms in obese persons. However, evidence supporting the efficacy of the other lifestyle modifications for patients with GERD is far less robust, and none (including weight loss) have been shown to be effective in patients with heartburn that is refractory to twice-daily PPI therapy, the subject of our trial. The health benefits of smoking cessation and weight loss for obese persons go far beyond any reduction in GERD symptoms, and we certainly support those recommendations. However, our trial was designed specifically to compare the effectiveness of antireflux surgery with that of medications for PPI-refractory heartburn. (Text of author’s reply to commentators on: Spechler SJ, Hunter JG, Jones KM, et al. Randomized trial of medical versus surgical treatment for refractory heartburn. N Engl J Med 2019;381:1513-1523.)