Thomas Hutson D.O.

Posted September 15th 2017

Integrating cytokines and angiogenic factors and tumour bulk with selected clinical criteria improves determination of prognosis in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Thomas Hutson D.O.

Thomas Hutson D.O.

Zurita, A. J., R. C. Gagnon, Y. Liu, H. T. Tran, R. A. Figlin, T. E. Hutson, A. M. D’Amelio, Jr., C. N. Sternberg, L. N. Pandite and J. V. Heymach (2017). “Integrating cytokines and angiogenic factors and tumour bulk with selected clinical criteria improves determination of prognosis in advanced renal cell carcinoma.” Br J Cancer 117(4): 478-484.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: In two clinical trials of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitor pazopanib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), we found interleukin-6 as predictive of pazopanib benefit. We evaluated the prognostic significance of candidate cytokines and angiogenic factors (CAFs) identified in that work relative to accepted clinical parameters. METHODS: Seven preselected plasma CAFs (interleukin-6, interleukin-8, osteopontin, VEGF, hepatocyte growth factor, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1), and E-selectin) were measured using multiplex ELISA in plasma collected pretreatment from 343 mRCC patients participating in the phase 3 registration trial of pazopanib vs placebo (NCT00334282). Tumour burden (per sum of longest diameters (SLD)) and 10 other clinical factors were also analysed for association with overall survival (OS; based on initial treatment assignment). RESULTS: Osteopontin, interleukin-6, and TIMP-1 were independently associated with OS in multivariable analysis. A model combining the three CAFs and five clinical variables (including SLD) had higher prognostic accuracy than the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria (concordance-index 0.75 vs 0.67, respectively), and distinguished two groups of patients within the original intermediate risk category. CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic model incorporating osteopontin, interleukin-6, TIMP-1, tumour burden, and selected clinical criteria increased prognostic accuracy for OS determination in mRCC patients.


Posted August 15th 2017

Integrating cytokines and angiogenic factors and tumour bulk with selected clinical criteria improves determination of prognosis in advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Thomas Hutson D.O.

Thomas Hutson D.O.

Zurita, A. J., R. C. Gagnon, Y. Liu, H. T. Tran, R. A. Figlin, T. E. Hutson, A. M. D’Amelio, Jr., C. N. Sternberg, L. N. Pandite and J. V. Heymach (2017). “Integrating cytokines and angiogenic factors and tumour bulk with selected clinical criteria improves determination of prognosis in advanced renal cell carcinoma.” Br J Cancer: 478-484.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: In two clinical trials of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor inhibitor pazopanib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), we found interleukin-6 as predictive of pazopanib benefit. We evaluated the prognostic significance of candidate cytokines and angiogenic factors (CAFs) identified in that work relative to accepted clinical parameters. METHODS: Seven preselected plasma CAFs (interleukin-6, interleukin-8, osteopontin, VEGF, hepatocyte growth factor, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1), and E-selectin) were measured using multiplex ELISA in plasma collected pretreatment from 343 mRCC patients participating in the phase 3 registration trial of pazopanib vs placebo (NCT00334282). Tumour burden (per sum of longest diameters (SLD)) and 10 other clinical factors were also analysed for association with overall survival (OS; based on initial treatment assignment). RESULTS: Osteopontin, interleukin-6, and TIMP-1 were independently associated with OS in multivariable analysis. A model combining the three CAFs and five clinical variables (including SLD) had higher prognostic accuracy than the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria (concordance-index 0.75 vs 0.67, respectively), and distinguished two groups of patients within the original intermediate risk category. CONCLUSIONS: A prognostic model incorporating osteopontin, interleukin-6, TIMP-1, tumour burden, and selected clinical criteria increased prognostic accuracy for OS determination in mRCC patients.


Posted June 15th 2017

Long-term Duration of First-Line Axitinib Treatment in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Thomas Hutson D.O.

Thomas Hutson D.O.

Rini, B. I., V. Gruenwald, E. Jonasch, M. N. Fishman, Y. Tomita, M. D. Michaelson, J. Tarazi, L. Cisar, S. Hariharan, A. H. Bair, B. Rosbrook and T. E. Hutson (2017). “Long-term duration of first-line axitinib treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma.” Target Oncol 12(3): 333-340.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a retrospective analysis of two clinical trials in treatment-naive patients (n = 402) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with axitinib. Our objective was to compare duration of treatment (DT) and clinical outcome in patients who achieved DT >18 months (longer DT) versus /=10% tumor shrinkage at first scan (74.8% vs. 55.3%; p = 0.0001) and maximum on-study tumor shrinkage was greater in longer-DT versus shorter-DT group (-51.8% vs. -22.1%; p < 0.0001). Median OS was 32.6 months in the overall population while in the patients with longer DT the median was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) grade >/=3 were more frequent in longer-DT versus shorter-DT and included hypertension (25.7% vs. 18.8%), diarrhea (15.1% vs. 4.4%), and weight decrease (11.2% vs. 3.2%); however, these AEs decreased over time in both groups. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, favorable hematology values, no bone or liver metastases, and baseline tumor burden below the overall median were associated with longer DT. CONCLUSIONS: Longer duration (>18 months) of axitinib treatment was associated with increased frequency of early tumor shrinkage, greater magnitude of tumor shrinkage, and a favorable OS.


Posted April 15th 2017

Long-term Duration of First-Line Axitinib Treatment in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Thomas Hutson D.O.

Thomas Hutson D.O.

Rini, B. I., V. Gruenwald, E. Jonasch, M. N. Fishman, Y. Tomita, M. D. Michaelson, J. Tarazi, L. Cisar, S. Hariharan, A. H. Bair, B. Rosbrook and T. E. Hutson (2017). “Long-term Duration of First-Line Axitinib Treatment in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.” Target Oncol: 2017 Mar [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a retrospective analysis of two clinical trials in treatment-naive patients (n = 402) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with axitinib. Our objective was to compare duration of treatment (DT) and clinical outcome in patients who achieved DT >18 months (longer DT) versus /=10% tumor shrinkage at first scan (74.8% vs. 55.3%; p = 0.0001) and maximum on-study tumor shrinkage was greater in longer-DT versus shorter-DT group (-51.8% vs. -22.1%; p < 0.0001). Median OS was 32.6 months in the overall population while in the patients with longer DT the median was not reached. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) grade >/=3 were more frequent in longer-DT versus shorter-DT and included hypertension (25.7% vs. 18.8%), diarrhea (15.1% vs. 4.4%), and weight decrease (11.2% vs. 3.2%); however, these AEs decreased over time in both groups. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, favorable hematology values, no bone or liver metastases, and baseline tumor burden below the overall median were associated with longer DT. CONCLUSIONS: Longer duration (>18 months) of axitinib treatment was associated with increased frequency of early tumor shrinkage, greater magnitude of tumor shrinkage, and a favorable OS.


Posted February 15th 2017

Circulating Tumor Cells in a Phase 3 Study of Docetaxel and Prednisone with or without Lenalidomide in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Thomas Hutson D.O.

Thomas Hutson D.O.

Vogelzang, N. J., K. Fizazi, J. M. Burke, R. De Wit, J. Bellmunt, T. E. Hutson, E. Crane, W. R. Berry, K. Doner, J. D. Hainsworth, P. J. Wiechno, K. Liu, M. F. Waldman, A. Gandhi, D. Barton, U. Jungnelius, A. Fandi, C. N. Sternberg and D. P. Petrylak (2017). “Circulating tumor cells in a phase 3 study of docetaxel and prednisone with or without lenalidomide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.” Eur Urol 71(2): 168-171.

Full text of this article.

Elevated circulating tumor cell (CTC) blood levels (>/=5 cells/7.5ml) convey a negative prognosis in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer but their prognostic significance in patients receiving chemotherapy is uncertain. The association between CTC counts (at baseline or after treatment), overall survival (OS), and response to docetaxel with lenalidomide was evaluated in a 208-patient subset from the MAINSAIL trial, which compared docetaxel-prednisone-lenalidomide and docetaxel-prednisone-placebo in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Baseline CTCs were <5 cells/7.5ml blood in 87 (42%) patients and >/=5 cells/7.5ml in 121 (58%) patients. Neither tumor response nor prostate-specific antigen response correlated with baseline CTCs. However, CTC count >/=5 cells/7.5ml was significantly associated with lower OS (hazard ratio: 3.23, p = 0.0028). Increases in CTCs from <5 cells/7.5ml to >/=5 cells/7.5ml after three cycles were associated with significantly shorter OS (hazard ratio: 5.24, p=0.025), whereas CTC reductions from >/=5 cells/7.5ml to <5 cells/7.5ml were associated with the best prognosis (p=0.003). PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with docetaxel chemotherapy, with or without lenalidomide, showed that patient survival was best predicted by circulating tumor cell count at the start of treatment. A rising circulating tumor cell count after three cycles of therapy predicted poor survival, while a decline predicted good survival.