Research Spotlight

Posted July 15th 2021

Page Kidney From a Subcapsular Urinoma Following Contralateral Radical Nephrectomy.

Bright Izekor, DO

Bright Izekor, DO

Izekor, B.E., Odigwe, C., Goraya, N. and Duran, P.A. (2021). “Page Kidney From a Subcapsular Urinoma Following Contralateral Radical Nephrectomy.” Cureus 13(6): e15639.

Full text of this article.

Page kidney is a rare cause of hypertension and kidney injury; it results from extrinsic compression of the kidney due to fluid accumulation in the subcapsular space. Hypertensive crisis may be the only presenting clinical sign in patients with Page kidney. Urinomas are a very rare cause of Page kidney with very few cases reported in the literature. Urinoma should be suspected in patients presenting in hypertensive crisis who have a history of recent abdominal trauma, genitourinary malignancy, and renal instrumentation. Patients diagnosed with Page kidney from a urinoma should be managed with the least invasive means possible.


Posted July 15th 2021

Phytochemicals as Therapeutic Interventions in Peripheral Artery Disease.

Robert S. Smith M.D.

Robert S. Smith M.D.

Ismaeel, A., Greathouse, K.L., Newton, N., Miserlis, D., Papoutsi, E., Smith, R.S., Eidson, J.L., Dawson, D.L., Milner, C.W., Widmer, R.J., Bohannon, W.T. and Koutakis, P. (2021). “Phytochemicals as Therapeutic Interventions in Peripheral Artery Disease.” Nutrients 13(7).

Full text of this article.

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects over 200 million people worldwide, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality, yet treatment options remain limited. Among the manifestations of PAD is a severe functional disability and decline, which is thought to be the result of different pathophysiological mechanisms including oxidative stress, skeletal muscle pathology, and reduced nitric oxide bioavailability. Thus, compounds that target these mechanisms may have a therapeutic effect on walking performance in PAD patients. Phytochemicals produced by plants have been widely studied for their potential health effects and role in various diseases including cardiovascular disease and cancer. In this review, we focus on PAD and discuss the evidence related to the clinical utility of different phytochemicals. We discuss phytochemical research in preclinical models of PAD, and we highlight the results of the available clinical trials that have assessed the effects of these compounds on PAD patient functional outcomes.


Posted July 15th 2021

Successful Aging in East Asia: Comparison Among China, Korea, and Japan.

Jinmyoung Cho, Ph.D.

Jinmyoung Cho, Ph.D.

Nakagawa, T., Cho, J. and Yeung, D.Y. (2021). “Successful Aging in East Asia: Comparison Among China, Korea, and Japan.” J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 76(Supplement_1): S17-s26.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVES: Heterogeneity in successful aging has been found across countries. Yet, comparable evidence is sparse except in North America and Europe. Extending prior research, this study examined the prevalence and correlates of successful aging in East Asia: China, Korea, and Japan. METHOD: We used harmonized data sets from national surveys. A total of 6,479 participants (aged between 65 and 75) were analyzed. Using Rowe and Kahn’s (1987, 1997) model, successful aging was defined as having no major diseases, no difficulty performing activities of daily living, obtaining a median or higher score on tests of cognitive function, and being actively engaged. RESULTS: The average prevalence of successful agers was 17.6%. There were variations in the global and specific measures of successful aging within and across countries, even after controlling for individual sociodemographic factors (age, gender, and education). The odds of aging successfully were highest in Japan and lowest in China, especially in the rural areas. Being younger and males were associated with a higher likelihood of successful agers in both global and specific measures. DISCUSSION: This study observed heterogeneity in successful aging in East Asia. To identify policy implications, future research should explore potential societal factors influencing individuals’ opportunities for successful aging.


Posted July 15th 2021

Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Molly Szerlip M.D.

Molly Szerlip M.D.

Herrmann, H.C., Cohen, D.J., Hahn, R.T., Babaliaros, V.C., Yu, X., Makkar, R., McCabe, J., Szerlip, M., Kapadia, S., Russo, M., Malaisrie, S.C., Webb, J.G., Szeto, W.Y., Kodali, S., Thourani, V.H., Mack, M.J. and Leon, M.B. (2021). “Utilization, Costs, and Outcomes of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.” Circ Cardiovasc Interv Jun 16;CIRCINTERVENTIONS120010310. [Epub ahead of print]. Circinterventions120010310.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: The potential advantages for conscious sedation (CS) as compared to general anesthesia (GA) have not been evaluated in studies with core laboratory echocardiographic assessments and monitored end points. We compared CS versus GA for SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients at intermediate- and low-surgical risk. METHODS: This analysis included patients in the PARTNER 2 (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve Trial) intermediate-risk registry and the PARTNER 3 randomized low-risk study. CS was compared to GA with respect to death, stroke, bleeding, paravalvular regurgitation, length of stay, and costs. Outcomes were assessed by a core echocardiographic laboratory, and clinical events were independently adjudicated. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the CS and GA groups. Postprocedure hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for CS versus GA both in intermediate-risk patients (4.4±0.2 and 5.2±0.2 days, respectively, P<0.01) and low-risk patients (2.7±0.1 and 3.4±0.2 days, respectively, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between CA and GA patients in either the 30-day or 1-year rates of death, stroke, rehospitalization, or paravalvular aortic regurgitation ≥moderate. In the intermediate-risk cohort, adjusted 30-day health care costs were $3833 lower per patient in the CS group. CONCLUSIONS: The selective use of CS is associated with shorter procedure times, shorter intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, lower costs, and no difference in clinical outcomes to 1 year, including ≥moderate paravalvular regurgitation. Our data demonstrate similar safety profiles with both approaches and support the continued use of CS for most patients undergoing the procedure. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT03222128 and NCT02675114.


Posted July 15th 2021

Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Inclusive of All Women at Average Risk: Update from the ACR and Society of Breast Imaging.

Debra L. Monticciolo. M.D.

Debra L. Monticciolo. M.D.

Monticciolo, D.L., Malak, S.F., Friedewald, S.M., Eby, P.R., Newell, M.S., Moy, L., Destounis, S., Leung, J.W.T., Hendrick, R.E. and Smetherman, D. (2021). “Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Inclusive of All Women at Average Risk: Update from the ACR and Society of Breast Imaging.” J Am Coll Radiol Jun 18;S1546-1440(21)00383-5. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

Breast cancer remains the most common nonskin cancer, the second leading cause of cancer deaths, and the leading cause of premature death in US women. Mammography screening has been proven effective in reducing breast cancer deaths in women age 40 years and older. A mortality reduction of 40% is possible with regular screening. Treatment advances cannot overcome the disadvantage of being diagnosed with an advanced-stage tumor. The ACR and Society of Breast Imaging recommend annual mammography screening beginning at age 40, which provides the greatest mortality reduction, diagnosis at earlier stage, better surgical options, and more effective chemotherapy. Annual screening results in more screening-detected tumors, tumors of smaller sizes, and fewer interval cancers than longer screening intervals. Screened women in their 40s are more likely to have early-stage disease, negative lymph nodes, and smaller tumors than unscreened women. Delaying screening until age 45 or 50 will result in an unnecessary loss of life to breast cancer and adversely affects minority women in particular. Screening should continue past age 74 years, without an upper age limit unless severe comorbidities limit life expectancy. Benefits of screening should be considered along with the possibilities of recall for additional imaging and benign biopsy and the less tangible risks of anxiety and overdiagnosis. Although recall and biopsy recommendations are higher with more frequent screening, so are life-years gained and breast cancer deaths averted. Women who wish to maximize benefit will choose annual screening starting at age 40 years and will not stop screening prematurely.