Research Spotlight

Posted May 21st 2021

Depression screening and treatment among uninsured populations in Primary Care.

Katherine E. Sanchez Ph.D.

Katherine E. Sanchez Ph.D.

Rezaeizadeh, A., Sanchez, K., Zolfaghari, K. and Madia, N.D. (2021). “Depression screening and treatment among uninsured populations in Primary Care.” Int J Clin Health Psychol 21(3): 100241.

Full text of this article.

Uninsured populations have poor treatment engagement and are less likely to receive evidence-based interventions for depression. The objective of the current study was to retrospectively examine depression screening, diagnosis, and treatment patterns among uninsured patients in primary care. Study sample included all patients (N = 11,803) seen in nine community-based clinics. Key variables included depression screener and/or a depression diagnosis, anti-depressant initiation, behavioral health visits, and patient follow up measures. Treatment patterns from the subsample of patients diagnosed with depression were analyzed by collecting the number of behavioral health visits and antidepressant use six months (180 days) following the diagnosis. Utilization of the depression screening tool was high (67%, n = 7,935) and 24% (n = 2,789) of the patients had a diagnosis of depression, however, more than half of the patients with a depression diagnosis did not have a recorded treatment plan (n = 1,474). The odds of anti-depressant use and behavioral visits for Hispanic patients were significantly greater than for Non-Hispanic patients. Universal screening with brief measures in primary care is improving, however, guideline-concordant depression treatment remains elusive for uninsured populations.


Posted May 21st 2021

A retrospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of apixaban use after lung transplant.

Teena Sam, PharmD

Teena Sam, PharmD

Reininger, K.A., Sam, T., Patel, R.S., Grazia, T.J., Naik, C.A., Ausloos, K.A., Rosenblatt, R.L. and Lam, I.L.L. (2021). “A retrospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of apixaban use after lung transplant.” Clin Transplant: e14327.

Full text of this article.

Direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the mainstay of treatment for patients requiring anticoagulation for atrial arrhythmias and venous thromboembolism (VTE) but safety and efficacy has not been established in lung transplantation. This is a retrospective review of 28 adult lung transplant patients who were prescribed apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial arrhythmias or treatment of VTE between October 15, 2015 and December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was a composite of efficacy and safety measured by recurrence or breakthrough of stroke or thromboembolism and bleeding events. Seven patients were treated for atrial arrhythmias and 21 treated for VTE. Fifteen patients received CYP3A4 or P-gp inhibitors at initiation of anticoagulation, and 4 of these patients received strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. During the follow-up period, one breakthrough DVT and one clinically relevant non-major bleed were observed. These data suggest that apixaban may be safe to use for lung transplant patients, and larger studies are warranted to assess long-term outcomes as well as safety and efficacy of alternative DOACs.


Posted May 21st 2021

Single-use duodenoscopes and duodenoscopes with disposable end caps.

Erik F. Rahimi, M.D.

Erik F. Rahimi, M.D.

Trindade, A.J., Copland, A., Bhatt, A., Bucobo, J.C., Chandrasekhara, V., Krishnan, K., Parsi, M.A., Kumta, N., Law, R., Pannala, R., Rahimi, E.F., Saumoy, M., Trikudanathan, G., Yang, J. and Lichtenstein, D.R. (2021). “Single-use duodenoscopes and duodenoscopes with disposable end caps.” Gastrointest Endosc 93(5): 997-1005.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multidrug-resistant infectious outbreaks associated with duodenoscopes have been documented internationally. Single-use duodenoscopes, disposable distal ends, or distal end cap sealants could eliminate or reduce exogenous patient-to-patient infection associated with ERCP. METHODS: This document reviews technologies that have been developed to help reduce or eliminate exogenous infections because of duodenoscopes. RESULTS: Four duodenoscopes with disposable end caps, 1 end sheath, and 2 disposable duodenoscopes are reviewed in this document. The evidence regarding their efficacy in procedural success rates, reduction of duodenoscope bacterial contamination, clinical outcomes associated with these devices, safety, and the financial considerations are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Several technologies discussed in this document are anticipated to eliminate or reduce exogenous infections during endoscopy requiring a duodenoscope. Although disposable duodenoscopes can eliminate exogenous ERCP-related risk of infection, data regarding effectiveness are needed outside of expert centers. Additionally, with more widespread adoption of these new technologies, more data regarding functionality, medical economics, and environmental impact will accrue. Disposable distal end caps facilitate duodenoscope reprocessing; postmarketing surveillance culture studies and real-life patient infection analyses are important areas of future research.


Posted May 21st 2021

Devices and techniques for flexible endoscopic management of Zenker’s diverticulum (with videos).

Erik F. Rahimi, M.D.

Erik F. Rahimi, M.D.

Jirapinyo, P., Sethi, A., Abu Dayyeh, B.K., Bhutani, M.S., Chandrasekhara, V., Kumta, N.A., Melson, J., Pannala, R., Rahimi, E.F., Trikudanathan, G., Maple, J.T. and Lichtenstein, D.R. (2021). “Devices and techniques for flexible endoscopic management of Zenker’s diverticulum (with videos).” Gastrointest Endosc.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD) has traditionally been treated with open surgery or rigid endoscopy. With the advances in endoscopy, alternative flexible endoscopic treatments have been developed. METHODS: This document reviews current endoscopic techniques and devices used to treat ZD. RESULTS: The endoscopic techniques may be categorized as the traditional flexible endoscopic septal division and the more recent submucosal tunneling endoscopic septum division, also known as peroral endoscopic myotomy for ZD. This document also addresses clinical outcomes, safety, and financial considerations. CONCLUSIONS: Flexible endoscopic approaches treat symptomatic ZD with results that are favorable compared with traditional open surgical or rigid endoscopic alternatives.


Posted May 21st 2021

Global Differences in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The PARAGON-HF Trial.

Milton Packer M.D.

Milton Packer M.D.

Tromp, J., Claggett, B.L., Liu, J., Jackson, A.M., Jhund, P.S., Køber, L., Widimský, J., Boytsov, S.A., Chopra, V.K., Anand, I.S., Ge, J., Chen, C.H., Maggioni, A.P., Martinez, F., Packer, M., Pfeffer, M.A., Pieske, B., Redfield, M.M., Rouleau, J.L., Van Veldhuisen, D.J., Zannad, F., Zile, M.R., Rizkala, A.R., Inubushi-Molessa, A., Lefkowitz, M.P., Shi, V.C., McMurray, J.J.V., Solomon, S.D. and Lam, C.S.P. (2021). “Global Differences in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The PARAGON-HF Trial.” Circ Heart Fail 14(4): e007901.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a global public health problem with important regional differences. We investigated these differences in the PARAGON-HF trial (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Global Outcomes in HFpEF), the largest and most inclusive global HFpEF trial. METHODS: We studied differences in clinical characteristics, outcomes, and treatment effects of sacubitril/valsartan in 4796 patients with HFpEF from the PARAGON-HF trial, grouped according to geographic region. RESULTS: Regional differences in patient characteristics and comorbidities were observed: patients from Western Europe were oldest (mean 75±7 years) with the highest prevalence of atrial fibrillation/flutter (36%); Central/Eastern European patients were youngest (mean 71±8 years) with the highest prevalence of coronary artery disease (50%); North American patients had the highest prevalence of obesity (65%) and diabetes (49%); Latin American patients were younger (73±9 years) and had a high prevalence of obesity (53%); and Asia-Pacific patients had a high prevalence of diabetes (44%), despite a low prevalence of obesity (26%). Rates of the primary composite end point of total hospitalizations for HF and death from cardiovascular causes were lower in patients from Central Europe (9 per 100 patient-years) and highest in patients from North America (28 per 100 patient-years), which was primarily driven by a greater number of total hospitalizations for HF. The effect of treatment with sacubitril-valsartan was not modified by region (interaction P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with HFpEF recruited worldwide in PARAGON-HF, there were important regional differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes, which may have implications for the design of future clinical trials. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01920711.