Litton, J.K., Hurvitz, S.A., Mina, L.A., Rugo, H.S., Lee, K.H., Gonçalves, A., Diab, S., Woodward, N., Goodwin, A., Yerushalmi, R., Roché, H., Im, Y.H., Eiermann, W., Quek, R.G.W., Usari, T., Lanzalone, S., Czibere, A., Blum, J.L., Martin, M. and Ettl, J. (2020). “Talazoparib versus chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results from the EMBRACA trial.” Ann Oncol Aug 20;S0923-7534(20)42106-4. [Epub ahead of print.].
Full text of this article.
BACKGROUND: In EMBRACA, talazoparib prolonged progression-free survival versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.542 [95% CI 0.413-0.711]; P < 0.0001) and improved patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2)-mutated advanced breast cancer (ABC). We report final overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized phase III trial enrolled patients with gBRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative ABC. Patients received talazoparib or physician's choice of chemotherapy. OS was analyzed using stratified HR and log-rank test and prespecified rank-preserving structural failure time model to account for subsequent treatments. RESULTS: 431 patients were randomized (287 talazoparib/144 chemotherapy) with 412 patients treated (286 talazoparib/126 chemotherapy). By September 30, 2019, 216 deaths (75.3%) occurred for talazoparib and 108 (75.0%) chemotherapy; median follow-up was 44.9 and 36.8 months, respectively. HR for OS with talazoparib versus chemotherapy was 0.848 (95% CI 0.670-1.073; P = 0.17); median (95% CI) 19.3 months (16.6-22.5) versus 19.5 months (17.4-22.4). Kaplan-Meier survival percentages (95% CI) for talazoparib versus chemotherapy: Month 12, 71% (66-76)/74% (66-81); Month 24, 42% (36-47)/38% (30-47); Month 36, 27% (22-33)/21% (14-29). Most patients received subsequent treatments: for talazoparib and chemotherapy, respectively, 46.3%/41.7% received platinum and 4.5%/32.6% received a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor. Adjusting for subsequent PARP and/or platinum use, HR for OS was 0.756 (95% bootstrap CI 0.503-1.029). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 69.6% (talazoparib) and 64.3% (chemotherapy) patients, consistent with previous reports. Extended follow-up showed significant overall improvement and delay in time to definitive clinically meaningful deterioration in global health status/quality of life and breast symptoms favoring talazoparib versus chemotherapy (P < 0.01 for all), consistent with initial analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In gBRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative ABC, talazoparib did not significantly improve OS over chemotherapy; subsequent treatments may have impacted analysis. Safety was consistent with previous observations. PRO continued to favor talazoparib.