Research Spotlight

Posted January 15th 2022

Outpatient colectomy-a dream or reality?

Stephen Campbell M.D.

Stephen Campbell M.D.

Campbell, S., Fichera, A., Thomas, S., Papaconstantinou, H. and Essani, R. (2022). “Outpatient colectomy-a dream or reality?” Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 35(1): 24-27.

Full text of this article.

Whereas the advancement of minimally invasive surgical techniques and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways for partial colectomies has shortened postoperative length of stay, the ideal length of stay after partial colectomy with or without diverting loop ileostomy is still up for debate. This article examines the safety and efficacy of discharging select patients home from day surgery following partial colectomy. We performed a retrospective review of 7 patients who underwent partial colectomy at one tertiary care center from December 2020 to August 2021. None of our cases suffered complications such as anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, or bowel obstruction or required admission to the hospital. One patient was seen in the emergency department on postoperative day 1 for nausea and vomiting and was managed as an outpatient. A second patient required a fluid bolus in the clinic for high ileostomy output. In conclusion, our study suggests that appropriately selected patients can be successfully managed in the outpatient setting without increased complications following partial colectomy when preoperative preparation and education are put in place alongside our colon ERAS pathway and minimally invasive surgical techniques.


Posted January 15th 2022

Early esophageal neuroendocrine tumor.

Anh Nguyen, M.D.

Anh Nguyen, M.D.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8682829/

Full text of this article.

Esophageal neuroendocrine tumors are rare and often found incidentally on endoscopy. We present a unique case of an esophageal neuroendocrine tumor found in the setting of dysplasia associated with Barrett’s esophagus. The tumor was removed endoscopically. This case highlights the incidence, prognosis, and management of esophageal neuroendocrine tumors.


Posted January 15th 2022

Differences in Mid-Term Outcomes Between Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aneurysm or Acute Aortic Syndromes: Report From the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment.

Dennis R. Gable, M.D.

Dennis R. Gable, M.D.

Bissacco, D., Domanin, M., Weaver, F.A., Azizzadeh, A., Miller, C.C., Gable, D.R., Piffaretti, G., Lomazzi, C. and Trimarchi, S. (2021). “Differences in Mid-Term Outcomes Between Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aneurysm or Acute Aortic Syndromes: Report From the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment.” J Endovasc Ther Dec 15;15266028211064819. [Epub ahead of print]. 15266028211064819.

Full text of this article.

PURPOSE: To analyze differences in baseline characteristics, overall mortality, device-related mortality, and re-intervention rates in patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA) with atherosclerotic/degenerative cause or acute aortic syndrome (AAS), using the Global Registry For Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients submitted to TEVAR for AAS or DTAA, included in GREAT, were eligible for this analysis. Primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality rate. Secondary outcomes were 30-day aorta-related mortality and re-intervention rate, 1-year and 3-year all-cause mortality, aorta-related mortality and re-intervention rate. RESULTS: Five-hundred and seventy-five patients were analyzed (305 DTAA and 270 AAS). Thirty-day mortality rate was 1.3% and 1.8% for DTAA and AAS, respectively (p=0.741). One-year and 3-year mortality rates were 6.2% versus 9.3 and 17.3% versus 15.9% for DTAA and AAS, respectively (p=0.209 and p=0.655, respectively). Aorta-related mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year and 3 years were 1.3%, 1.3%, and 2.6% for DTAA, 1.8%, 4.2%, and 4.2% for AAS (p=ns). Re-intervention rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years were 1.3%, 4.3%, and 7.5% for DTAA, 3.3%, 8.1%, and 10.7% for AAS (p=ns). Furthermore, a specific analysis with similar outcomes was performed dividing follow-up in 3 periods (1-30 days, 31-365 days, 366-1096 days) and describing mutual differences between 2 groups and temporal trends in each group. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent TEVAR for DTAA or AAS experienced different mortality and re-intervention rates among years during mid-term follow-up. Although all-cause related deaths within 30 days were TEVAR-related, aorta-related deaths were more common for AAS patients within 1 year. A greater re-intervention rate was described for AAS patients, although only 1 year after TEVAR.


Posted January 15th 2022

Characterization and Outcomes of Hospitalized Children With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Report From a Multicenter, Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (Coronavirus Disease 2019) Registry.

Valerie Danesh, Ph.D.

Valerie Danesh, Ph.D.

Bhalala, U.S., Gist, K.M., Tripathi, S., Boman, K., Kumar, V.K., Retford, L., Chiotos, K., Blatz, A.M., Dapul, H., Verma, S., Sayed, I.A., Gharpure, V.P., Bjornstad, E., Tofil, N., Irby, K., Sanders, R.C., Jr., Heneghan, J.A., Thomas, M., Gupta, M.K., Oulds, F.E., Arteaga, G.M., Levy, E.R., Gupta, N., Kaufman, M., Abdelaty, A., Shlomovich, M., Medar, S.S., Iqbal O’Meara, A.M., Kuehne, J., Menon, S., Khandhar, P.B., Miller, A.S., Barry, S.M., Danesh, V.C., Khanna, A.K., Zammit, K., Stulce, C., McGonagill, P.W., Bercow, A., Amzuta, I.G., Gupta, S., Almazyad, M.A., Pierre, L., Sendi, P., Ishaque, S., Anderson, H.L., 3rd, Nawathe, P., Akhter, M., Lyons, P.G., Chen, C., Walkey, A.J., Bihorac, A., Wada Bello, I., Ben Ari, J., Kovacevic, T., Bansal, V., Brinton, J.T., Zimmerman, J.J. and Kashyap, R. (2022). “Characterization and Outcomes of Hospitalized Children With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Report From a Multicenter, Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (Coronavirus Disease 2019) Registry.” Crit Care Med 50(1): e40-e51.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVES: Multicenter data on the characteristics and outcomes of children hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 are limited. Our objective was to describe the characteristics, ICU admissions, and outcomes among children hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 using Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study: Coronavirus Disease 2019 registry. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Society of Critical Care Medicine Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (Coronavirus Disease 2019) registry. PATIENTS: Children (< 18 yr) hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 at participating hospitals from February 2020 to January 2021. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was ICU admission. Secondary outcomes included hospital and ICU duration of stay and ICU, hospital, and 28-day mortality. A total of 874 children with coronavirus disease 2019 were reported to Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study registry from 51 participating centers, majority in the United States. Median age was 8 years (interquartile range, 1.25-14 yr) with a male:female ratio of 1:2. A majority were non-Hispanic (492/874; 62.9%). Median body mass index (n = 817) was 19.4 kg/m2 (16-25.8 kg/m2), with 110 (13.4%) overweight and 300 (36.6%) obese. A majority (67%) presented with fever, and 43.2% had comorbidities. A total of 238 of 838 (28.2%) met the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and 404 of 874 (46.2%) were admitted to the ICU. In multivariate logistic regression, age, fever, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and pre-existing seizure disorder were independently associated with a greater odds of ICU admission. Hospital mortality was 16 of 874 (1.8%). Median (interquartile range) duration of ICU (n = 379) and hospital (n = 857) stay were 3.9 days (2-7.7 d) and 4 days (1.9-7.5 d), respectively. For patients with 28-day data, survival was 679 of 787, 86.3% with 13.4% lost to follow-up, and 0.3% deceased. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational, multicenter registry of children with coronavirus disease 2019, ICU admission was common. Older age, fever, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, and seizure disorder were independently associated with ICU admission, and mortality was lower among children than mortality reported in adults.


Posted January 15th 2022

Cognitive Impairment and Physical Frailty in Patients With Cirrhosis.

Robert Rahimi, M.D.

Robert Rahimi, M.D.

Berry, K., Duarte-Rojo, A., Grab, J.D., Dunn, M.A., Boyarsky, B.J., Verna, E.C., Kappus, M.R., Volk, M.L., McAdams-DeMarco, M., Segev, D.L., Ganger, D.R., Ladner, D.P., Shui, A., Tincopa, M.A., Rahimi, R.S. and Lai, J.C. (2022). “Cognitive Impairment and Physical Frailty in Patients With Cirrhosis.” Hepatol Commun 6(1): 237-246.

Full text of this article.

Physical frailty and impaired cognition are common in patients with cirrhosis. Physical frailty can be assessed using performance-based tests, but the extent to which impaired cognition may impact performance is not well characterized. We assessed the relationship between impaired cognition and physical frailty in patients with cirrhosis. We enrolled 1,623 ambulatory adult patients with cirrhosis waiting for liver transplantation at 10 sites. Frailty was assessed with the liver frailty index (LFI; “frail,” LFI ≥ 4.4). Cognition was assessed at the same visit with the number connection test (NCT); continuous “impaired cognition” was examined in primary analysis, with longer NCT (more seconds) indicating worse impaired cognition. For descriptive statistics, “impaired cognition” was NCT ≥ 45 seconds. Linear regression associated frailty and impaired cognition; competing risk regression estimated subhazard ratios (sHRs) of wait-list mortality (i.e., death/delisting for sickness). Median NCT was 41 seconds, and 42% had impaired cognition. Median LFI (4.2 vs. 3.8) and rates of frailty (38% vs. 20%) differed between those with and without impaired cognition. In adjusted analysis, every 10-second NCT increase associated with a 0.08-LFI increase (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.10). In univariable analysis, both frailty (sHR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.43-1.87) and impaired cognition (sHR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10) associated with wait-list mortality. After adjustment, frailty but not impaired cognition remained significantly associated with wait-list mortality (sHR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.33-1.79). Impaired cognition mediated 7.4% (95% CI, 2.0%-16.4%) of the total effect of frailty on 1-year wait-list mortality. Conclusion: Patients with cirrhosis with higher impaired cognition displayed higher rates of physical frailty, yet frailty independently associated with wait-list mortality while impaired cognition did not. Our data provide evidence for using the LFI to understand mortality risk in patients with cirrhosis, even when concurrent impaired cognition varies.