Research Spotlight

Posted January 15th 2020

Trends in HeartMate 3: What we know so far.

Timothy J. George, M.D.
Timothy J. George, M.D.

Lanfear, A. T., M. Hamandi, J. Fan, J. M. DiMaio and T. J. George (2020). “Trends in HeartMate 3: What we know so far.” J Card Surg 35(1): 180-187.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a novel, intrapericardial, centrifugal-flow pump with a fully magnetically-levitated rotor designed to provide hemodynamic support in patients with end-stage heart failure. Unique aspects of this LVAD have allowed for improved hemocompatibility and the development of minimally-invasive implantation techniques. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for publications relating to the HeartMate 3 device, with a focus on hemocompatibility related outcomes, anticoagulation management, and surgical techniques. RESULTS: Nine articles analyzing hemocompatibility related outcomes from two clinical trials, two clinical studies, and one registry series were identified. CONCLUSION: HeartMate 3 has reduced the rate of disabling stroke and pump thrombosis. However, despite increased hemocompatibility due to specialized design features, the residual risk of both surgical, and gastrointestinal bleeding remains a major adverse outcome. Different anticoagulation management and surgical techniques have been evaluated to address the remaining complications.


Posted January 15th 2020

Assessing patients’ preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provider.

Rachel High, D.O.
Rachel High, D.O.

Hoke, T. P., A. A. Berger, C. C. Pan, L. A. Jackson, W. D. Winkelman, R. High, K. A. Volpe, C. P. Lin and H. E. Richter (2019). “Assessing patients’ preferences for gender, age, and experience of their urogynecologic provider.” Int Urogynecol J Dec 11. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Understanding patient preferences regarding provider characteristics is an under-explored area in urogynecology. This study aims to describe patient preferences for urogynecologic care, including provider gender, age, experience, and presence of medical trainees. METHODS: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional, survey-based study assessing patient preferences with a voluntary, self-administered, anonymous questionnaire prior to their first urogynecology consult. A 5-point Likert scale addressing provider gender, age, experience, and presence of trainees was used. Descriptive statistics summarized patient characteristics and provider preferences. Chi-squared (or Fisher’s exact) test was used to test for associations. RESULTS: Six hundred fifteen women participated from eight sites including all geographic regions across the US; 70.8% identified as white with mean age of 58.5 +/- 14.2 years. Urinary incontinence was the most commonly reported symptom (45.9%); 51.4% saw a female provider. The majority of patients saw a provider 45-60 years old (42.8%) with > 15 years’ experience (60.9%). Sixty-five percent of patients preferred a female provider; 10% preferred a male provider. Sixteen percent preferred a provider < 45 years old, 36% preferred 45-60 years old, and 11% of patients preferred a provider > 60 years old. Most patients preferred a provider with 5-15 or > 15 years’ experience (49% and 46%, respectively). Eleven percent preferred the presence of trainees while 24% preferred trainee absence. CONCLUSION: Patient preferences regarding urogynecologic providers included female gender and provider age 45-60 years old with > 5 years’ experience. Further study is needed to identify qualitative components associated with these preferences.


Posted January 15th 2020

Health Status After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis.

Michael J. Mack M.D.
Michael J. Mack M.D.

Baron, S. J., E. A. Magnuson, M. Lu, K. Wang, K. Chinnakondepalli, M. Mack, V. H. Thourani, S. Kodali, R. Makkar, H. C. Herrmann, S. Kapadia, V. Babaliaros, M. R. Williams, D. Kereiakes, A. Zajarias, M. C. Alu, J. G. Webb, C. R. Smith, M. B. Leon and D. J. Cohen (2019). “Health Status After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis.” J Am Coll Cardiol 74(23): 2833-2842.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at low surgical risk, treatment with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) results in lower rates of death, stroke, and rehospitalization at 1 year compared with surgical aortic valve replacement; however, the effect of treatment strategy on health status is unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare health status outcomes of TAVR versus surgery in low-risk patients with severe AS. METHODS: Between March 2016 and October 2017, 1,000 low-risk patients with AS were randomized to transfemoral TAVR using a balloon-expandable valve or surgery in the PARTNER 3 (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial. Health status was assessed at baseline and 1, 6, and 12 months using the KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire), SF-36 (Short Form-36 Health Survey), and EQ-5D (EuroQoL). The primary endpoint was change in KCCQ-OS (KCCQ Overall Summary) score over time. Longitudinal growth curve modeling was used to compare changes in health status between treatment groups over time. RESULTS: At 1 month, TAVR was associated with better health status than surgery (mean difference in KCCQ-OS 16.0 points; p < 0.001). At 6 and 12 months, health status remained better with TAVR, although the effect was reduced (mean difference in KCCQ-OS 2.6 and 1.8 points respectively; p < 0.04 for both). The proportion of patients with an excellent outcome (alive with KCCQ-OS >/=75 and no significant decline from baseline) was greater with TAVR than surgery at 6 months (90.3% vs. 85.3%; p = 0.03) and 12 months (87.3% vs. 82.8%; p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Among low-risk patients with severe AS, TAVR was associated with meaningful early and late health status benefits compared with surgery.


Posted January 15th 2020

The Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Insights From PROGRESS-CTO Registry).

James W. Choi M.D.
James W. Choi M.D.

Xenogiannis, I., F. Gkargkoulas, D. Karmpaliotis, K. Alaswad, O. Krestyaninov, D. Khelimskii, J. W. Choi [ . . . ] S. Potluri, J. W. Moses, N. J. Lembo, M. Parikh, A. J. Kirtane, Z. A. Ali, A. B. Hall, E. Vemmou, I. Nikolakopoulos, B. B. Dargham, B. V. Rangan, S. Abdullah, S. Garcia, S. Banerjee, M. N. Burke and E. S. Brilakis (2019). “The Impact of Peripheral Artery Disease in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Insights From PROGRESS-CTO Registry).” Angiology Dec 17. [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

The impact of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients undergoing chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has received limited study. We reviewed 3999 CTO PCIs performed in 3914 patients between 2012 and 2018 at 25 centers, 14% of whom had a history of PAD. We compared the clinical and angiographic characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients with versus without history of PAD. Patients with PAD were older (67 +/- 9 vs 64 +/- 10 years, P < .001) and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors. They also had more complex lesions as illustrated by higher Japanese CTO score (2.7 +/- 1.2 vs 2.4 +/- 1.3, P < .001). In patients with PAD, the final crossing technique was less often antegrade wire escalation (40% vs 51%, P < .001) and more often the retrograde approach (23 vs 20%, P < .001) and antegrade dissection/reentry (20% vs 16%, P < .001). Technical success was similar between the 2 study groups (84% vs 87%, P = .127), but procedural success was lower for patients with PAD (81% vs 85%, P = .015). The incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events was higher among patients with PAD (3% vs 2%, P = .046). In conclusion, patients with PAD undergoing CTO PCI have more comorbidities, more complex lesions, and lower procedural success.


Posted January 15th 2020

Variation in cognitive function over time in Gaucher disease type 3.

Raphael Schiffmann M.D.
Raphael Schiffmann M.D.

Steward, A. M., E. Wiggs, T. Lindstrom, S. Ukwuani, E. Ryan, N. Tayebi, T. Roshan Lal, G. Lopez, R. Schiffmann and E. Sidransky (2019). “Variation in cognitive function over time in Gaucher disease type 3.” Neurology 93(24): e2272-e2283.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVE: To identify relevant efficacy parameters essential in designing clinical trials for brain-penetrant therapies for Gaucher disease, we evaluated cognitive function longitudinally in 34 patients with Gaucher disease type 3 seen at the NIH Clinical Center. METHODS: Individuals were tested with age-appropriate Wechsler Intelligence Scales administered between 1 and 18 times over 29 years. Variation in all IQ domains was not linear with time and was best characterized with the coefficient of variation (SD/mean) for each individual. Mixed-effects regressions were used to determine whether IQ was associated with clinical features. Models were controlled for variation in test version, participant identification, and test administrator. RESULTS: Mean verbal, performance, and full-scale IQs were 81.77, 75.98, and 82.02, respectively, with a consistent discrepancy between verbal and performance IQs. Mean (SD) verbal, performance, and full-scale coefficient of variations were 0.07 (0.04), 0.09 (0.05), and 0.06 (0.02), respectively. IQ varied about a mean, with no clear trajectory, indicating no clear patterns of improvement or decline over time. EEG lateralization and behavioral issues were consistently associated with IQ. CONCLUSIONS: The observed variation in IQ in Gaucher disease type 3 across the cohort and within single individuals over time may be characteristic of other neuronopathic diseases. Therefore, to reliably use IQ as an efficacy measure in any clinical trial of neurotherapeutics, a normal variation range must be established to assess the clinical relevance of any IQ change.