Prior Heart Failure Hospitalization, Clinical Outcomes, and Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared with Valsartan in HFpEF.
Vaduganathan, M., B. L. Claggett, A. S. Desai, S. D. Anker, S. V. Perrone, S. Janssens, D. Milicic, J. L. Arango, M. Packer, V. C. Shi, M. P. Lefkowitz, J. J. V. McMurray and S. D. Solomon (2019). “Prior Heart Failure Hospitalization, Clinical Outcomes, and Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared with Valsartan in HFpEF.” J Am Coll Cardiol Nov 6. [Epub ahead of print].
BACKGROUND: The period shortly after hospitalization for heart failure (HF) represents a high-risk window for recurrent clinical events, including rehospitalization or death. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan varies in relation to the proximity to HF hospitalization among patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of PARAGON-HF, we assessed risk of clinical events and response to sacubitril/valsartan in relation to time from last HF hospitalization among patients with HFpEF (>/=45%). Primary outcome was composite total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death, analyzed using a semiparametric proportional rates method, stratified by geographic region. RESULTS: Of 4,796 validly randomized patients in PARAGON-HF, 622 (13%) were screened during hospitalization or within 30 days of prior hospitalization, 555 (12%) within 31-90 days, 435 (9%) within 91-180 days, 694 (14%) after 180 days, and 2,490 (52%) were never previously hospitalized. Over median 35 months follow-up, risk of total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death was inversely and non-linearly associated with timing from prior HF hospitalization (P<0.001). There was a gradient in relative risk reduction in primary events with sacubitril/valsartan from patients hospitalized within 30 days (rate ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.99) to patients never hospitalized (rate ratio 1.00; 95% confidence interval 0.80-1.24); trend in relative risk reduction Pinteraction=0.15. With valsartan alone, rate of total primary events was 26.7 (=30 days), 24.2 (31-90 days), 20.7 (91-180 days), 15.7 (>180 days), and 7.9 (not previously hospitalized) per 100 patient-years. Compared with valsartan, absolute risk reductions with sacubitril/valsartan were more prominent in patients enrolled early after hospitalization: 6.4% (=30 days), 4.6% (31-90 days), 3.4% (91-180 days), while no risk reduction was observed in patients screened >180 days or who were never hospitalized; trend in absolute risk reduction Pinteraction=0.050. CONCLUSIONS: Recent hospitalization for HFpEF identifies patients at high-risk for near-term clinical progression. In the PARAGON-HF trial, relative and absolute benefits of sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan in HFpEF appear to be amplified when initiated in the high-risk window after hospitalization and warrants prospective validation.