Patient Safety under Flexible and Standard Duty-Hour Rules.
John J. Squiers, M.D.
Squiers, J. J. (2019). “Patient Safety under Flexible and Standard Duty-Hour Rules.” N Engl J Med 380(24): 2380.
Silber and colleagues report that in their trial, 30-day mortality and other measures of patient safety were not adversely affected by flexible duty hours, as compared with standard duty hours, for internal-medicine residents. Similarly, in the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) Trial, Bilimoria and colleagues1 reported that flexible duty hours for general surgical residents were associated with noninferior rates of postoperative death or complications. However, previously reported results of these trials showed that residents’ satisfaction with the quality of their education varied: internal-medicine interns with standard duty hours had greater satisfaction than those with flexible duty hours, but among general surgical residents, there was no difference in satisfaction between those in the standard-duty group and those in the flexible-duty group. In another trial, pediatrics residents who were randomly assigned to shifts with standard duty hours were less satisfied with their education than residents assigned to shifts with flexible duty hours. Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) recently relaxed duty-hour regulations for all specialties, these findings suggest that the “one-size-fits-all” approach affects resident education differently across specialties, without any improvement in patient outcomes. Instead, each specialty should determine how best to regulate resident schedules in compliance with the ACGME 80-hour workweek. (Text of letter concerning the article, Silber JH, Bellini LM, Shea JA, et al. Patient safety outcomes under flexible and standard resident duty-hour rules. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 905-914.)