Stroke After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Pathogenesis, and Outcomes.
Michael J. Mack M.D.
Gaudino, M., D. J. Angiolillo, A. Di Franco, D. Capodanno, F. Bakaeen, M. E. Farkouh, S. E. Fremes, D. Holmes, L. N. Girardi, S. Nakamura, S. J. Head, S. J. Park, M. Mack, P. W. Serruys, M. Ruel, G. W. Stone, D. Y. Tam, M. Vallely and D. P. Taggart (2019). “Stroke After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Pathogenesis, and Outcomes.” J Am Heart Assoc 8(13): e013032. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
Stroke carries high short‐ and long‐term mortality and significantly adversely affects quality of life after both CABG and PCI. In an era in which practice guidelines endorse fully informing patients of the available treatment options and actively including them in the decision‐making process, defining the risk of stroke, both acute and long term, and its clinical implications is of paramount importance. CABG carries higher perioperative risk of stroke but provides greater long‐term freedom from recurrent ischemic coronary events and better survival, especially in the patients with most severe disease.2 Percutaneous revascularization is feasible in many patients and is associated with relatively low stroke rates, but this benefit needs to weighed against the higher rates of long‐term mortality and myocardial infarction, particularly in some categories of patients with diabetes mellitus and/or extensive multivessel disease. Indeed, better understanding the size of an injury deriving from a stroke with the 2 available revascularization approaches and the significance of silent brain lesions or neurocognitive changes that may occur would inform the decision‐making process. However, data on these measures (e.g., serial brain imaging) are lacking. A number of measures can be considered to reduce neurological risk in patients undergoing revascularization. For surgery, pre‐ and intraoperative screening of the ascending aorta and optimization of cerebral perfusion pressure based on continuous monitoring are important measures to minimize stroke risk. The use of the anaortic technique has the potential to minimize stroke risk during CABG. Given its technical complexity, specific training is required, ideally in the context of a new CABG subspecialty. Other technical advancements (e.g., embolic protection) warrant investigation to reduce the perioperative risk of stroke in patients undergoing CABG. For PCI, the reduction in mortality and bleeding—with some data also showing a reduction in peri-procedural stroke—associated with radial access potentially makes this approach the vascular access of choice. Regardless of vascular access, operator experience and competency play key roles in minimizing catheter‐induced trauma to the aortic wall and cerebral embolization. Other important measures include optimal anticoagulation and avoidance of air embolism with adequate flushing and connections to the manifold. Routine use of manual thrombectomy in ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction should be avoided; if required, adequate catheter engagement should be maintained to avoid embolization of thrombotic material. Finally, IABP and hemodynamic support devices in general should be used with caution, particularly in patients with diffuse atherosclerotic aortic disease. (Excerpt from text, p. e013032, 8-9; no abstract available.)