Guidelines for the Evaluation of Valvular Regurgitation After Percutaneous Valve Repair or Replacement: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
Paul A. Grayburn M.D.
Zoghbi, W. A., F. M. Asch, C. Bruce, L. D. Gillam, P. A. Grayburn, R. T. Hahn, I. Inglessis, A. M. Islam, S. Lerakis, S. H. Little, R. J. Siegel, N. Skubas, T. C. Slesnick, W. J. Stewart, P. Thavendiranathan, N. J. Weissman, S. Yasukochi and K. G. Zimmerman (2019). “Guidelines for the Evaluation of Valvular Regurgitation After Percutaneous Valve Repair or Replacement: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.” J Am Soc Echocardiogr 32(4): 431-475.
Valvular disease remains a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. Over the past decade, catheter-based interventions in valvular disease have evolved from balloon dilation of native stenotic valves to repair of paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) with vascular plugs and more recently to valve replacement and repair. Currently-approved interventions include transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), pulmonic valve replacement, and mitral valve repair, targeted to specific populations. Rapid technological advancements in device design are likely to improve acute and long-term results and expand current indications. Hemodynamics of percutaneous valves have been very favorable. However, a challenging area has been the new or residual valve regurgitation that may occur either after transcatheter valve implantation or repair of a native or prosthetic valve. This condition presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to the interventional and imaging cardiology team in the catheterization laboratory and to the clinician and imager in the outpatient setting. The current document addresses the challenges of assessing residual regurgitation after percutaneous valve replacement or repair and provides a guide to the cardiac team on how best to approach this condition, based on the available data and a consensus of a panel of experts. This document supplements the previous American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guideline on the assessment of surgically implanted prosthetic valves. 6 It does not address flow dynamics through the percutaneous prosthetic valves since, in general, the evaluation is similar to surgically implanted valves, 6 but focuses mostly on new or residual valvular regurgitation. In addition to the use of echocardiography and hemodynamic assessment in the acute setting, the document incorporates the role of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. This guideline is accompanied by a number of tutorials and illustrative case-studies on evaluation of valvular regurgitation after catheter-based interventions as well as native valve regurgitation, posted on the following website ( www.asecho.org/vrcases ), which will build gradually over time. (Excertp from text, p. 431; no abstract available.)