Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy (Commentary).
James R. Edgerton M.D.
Edgerton, J. R. (2019). “Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy (Commentary).” Ann Thorac Surg. Apr 2. [Epub ahead of print].
In this issue of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, the Washington University group reports the results of surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in 34 patients with tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy (TIC) defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <41% and absent another etiology. Excluding one death, 33 patients were available for follow-up and 27 of these had an evaluable echo at about 12 months. At 12 months 94% of patients were free of atrial tachyarrhythmias with/without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Mean LVEF improved from 32% to 55%. Of 11 pts in NYHA Class III/IV, 8 improved to Class I/II. These changes reached statistical significance. It is important to note that LV function improved in all patients and it improved to >55% in 19/27 patients. The prognostic significance of the presence of fibrosis (inhibits recovery of function), as reported in the CAMERA-MRI study and reiterated in this report, should be stressed. In patient selection, it is important to differentiate between TIC and a dilated cardiomyopathy with secondary atrial fibrillation (AF). The former will not be helped by performing a Maze and the latter will. To differentiate, the authors perform a cardiac MRI to assess for myocardial viability and the degree of left ventricular fibrosis by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). On multivariate analysis, only the absence of LGE was found to predict LVEF normalization. Any presence of fibrosis rules the patient out as a candidate for surgical ablation. If there is any other abnormality on cardiac MRI, or a high index of suspicion, endomyocardial biopsies are performed. Thus, a pre-op MRI will help the clinician in deciding whether to operate for TIC. Although the numbers of patients are small, documenting these findings is very significant. It would be easy for a reader to dismiss this paper as a small retrospective series of little significance. This would be a grave error. Yes, the numbers are small, but few groups have adequate volume to accumulate this many patients and most lack the investigatory rigor to document the post-op course in such detail. Additionally, very few groups have pre-op MRIs on these patients. As the authors point out, current guideline statements on the treatment of TIC, “include only non-surgical rhythm control strategies.” This is the true significance of this paper. Based on the findings documented here, a Class IIa, LOE B-NR is justified for surgical ablation of AF in patients with TIC who are undergoing cardiac surgery for another reason or have failed AADs and catheter ablation. Future guideline committees need to consider this work when revising current guidelines. (Excerpt from text, p. 1 of article-in-press.)