Research Spotlight

Shimura, T., S. Toden, R. Kandimalla, Y. Toiyama, Y. Okugawa, M. Kanda, H. Baba, Y. Kodera, M. Kusunoki and A. Goel (2021). “Genomewide Expression Profiling Identifies a Novel miRNA-based Signature for the Detection of Peritoneal Metastasis in Patients With Gastric Cancer.” Ann Surg 274(5): e425-e434.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a genomewide transcriptomic profiling to develop a microRNA (miRNA)-based signature for the identification of peritoneal metastasis (PM) in patients with gastric cancer (GC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Even though PM in patients with GC has long been recognized to associate with poor prognosis, currently there is lack of availability of molecular biomarkers for its robust diagnosis. METHODS: We performed a systematic biomarker discovery by analyzing miRNA expression profiles in primary tumors from GC patients with and without PM, and subsequently validated the expression of candidate miRNA biomarkers in 3 independent clinical cohorts of 354 patients with advanced GC. RESULTS: Five miRNAs (miR-30a-5p, -134-5p, -337-3p, -659-3p, and -3917) were identified during the initial discovery phase; three of which (miR-30a-5p, -659-3p, and -3917) were significantly overexpressed in the primary tumors from PM-positive patients in the testing cohort (P = 0.002, 0.04, and 0.007, respectively), and distinguished patients with versus without peritoneal metastasis with the value of area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82. Furthermore, high expression of these miRNAs also associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio = 2.18, P = 0.04). The efficacy of the combination miRNA signature was subsequently validated in an independent validation cohort (AUC = 0.74). Finally, our miRNA signature when combined together with the macroscopic Borrmann’s type score offered a much superior diagnostic in all 3 cohorts (AUC = 0.87, 0.76, and 0.79, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We have established an miRNA-based signature that have a potential to identify peritoneal metastasis in GC patients.

Roberson, D., D. K. Newman, J. B. Ziemba, A. Wein, H. Stambakio, R. G. Hamilton, L. Callender, L. Holderbaum, T. King, A. Jackson, T. Tran, G. Lin and A. L. Smith (2021). “Results of the patient report of intermittent catheterization experience (PRICE) study.” Neurourol Urodyn 40(8): 2008-2019.

Full text of this article.

AIMS: Patient satisfaction is paramount to health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) outcomes. High quality, quantitative data from the US describing patients’ actual experiences, difficulties, and HR-QoL while on an intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) regimen is very scarce. Our objective was to better understand patient practices with and attitudes towards ISC. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional, multi-centered, clinical study of adult men and women performing ISC in the United States. Data collected included demographics, medical history, catheter characteristics, specific self-catheterization habits and two validated HR-QoL questionnaires: The Intermittent Self-Catheterization Questionnaire (ISC-Q) and the Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire (ICDQ). RESULTS: Two hundred participants were recruited from six sites; 70.0% were male, 73.5% were Caucasian with a median age was 51.0 years (range 19-90 years). The ISC-Q showed that the vast majority of participants reported ease with ISC (82.0% satisfaction score) had confidence in their ability to perform ISC (91.9% satisfaction score); yet, many felt self-conscious about doing so (58.3% satisfaction score) and had concerns about long-term adverse effects (58.1% satisfaction score). The ICDQ indicated little to no difficulty for most participants with all routine ISC practices. A small minority of participants reported some difficulty with a “blocking sensation” during initiation of catheterization, leg spasticity, and painful catheterization. Multivariate linear regression results are also reported. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Participants are confident with ISC and have little overall difficulty, which may be a product of successful education and/or catheter design. urinary tract infections (UTIs) were common (yet variable) and may contribute to the noted long-term ISC concerns. Limitations exist including various selection biases leading to concerns of external validity. Future educational interventions in this population may further improve HR-QoL, optimize UTIs prevention, and diminish concerns with long-term ISC.

Brener, M. I., P. Grayburn, J. Lindenfeld, D. Burkhoff, M. Liu, Z. Zhou, M. C. Alu, D. A. Medvedofsky, F. M. Asch, N. J. Weissman, J. Bax, W. Abraham, M. J. Mack, G. W. Stone and R. T. Hahn (2021). “Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Arterial Coupling in Patients With HF Secondary MR: Analysis From the COAPT Trial.” JACC Cardiovasc Interv 14(20): 2231-2242.

Full text of this article.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic impact of right ventricular (RV)-pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling in patients with heart failure (HF) with severe secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) enrolled in the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation) trial. BACKGROUND: RV contractile function and PA pressures influence outcomes in patients with SMR, but the impact of RV-PA coupling in patients randomized to transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) vs guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is unknown. METHODS: RV-PA coupling was assessed by the ratio of RV free wall longitudinal strain derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography and noninvasively measured RV systolic pressure. Advanced RV-PA uncoupling was defined as RV free wall longitudinal strain/RV systolic pressure ≤0.5%/mm Hg. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization at 24-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients underwent speckle-tracking echocardiography, and 70.2% had advanced RV-PA uncoupling. By multivariable analysis, advanced RV-PA uncoupling was strongly associated with an increased risk for the primary 24-month endpoint of death or HF hospitalization (HR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.31-2.66; P = 0.0005). A similar association was present for all-cause mortality alone (HR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.54-4.29; P = 0.0003). The impact of RV-PA uncoupling was consistent in patients randomized to TEER and GDMT alone. Compared with GDMT alone, the addition of TEER improved 2-year outcomes in patients with (48.0% vs 74.8%; HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.37-0.71) and those without (28.8% vs 47.8%; HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27-0.97) advanced RV-PA uncoupling (P(interaction) = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: In the COAPT trial, advanced RV dysfunction assessed by RV-PA uncoupling was a powerful predictor of 2-year adverse outcomes in patients with HF and SMR. (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation [The COAPT Trial]; NCT01626079).

Rosas, I. O., G. Diaz, R. L. Gottlieb, S. M. Lobo, P. Robinson, B. D. Hunter, A. W. Cavalcante, J. S. Overcash, N. A. Hanania, A. Skarbnik, J. Garcia-Diaz, I. Gordeev, J. Carratalà, O. Gordon, E. Graham, N. Lewin-Koh, L. Tsai, K. Tuckwell, H. Cao, D. Brainard and J. K. Olsson (2021). “Tocilizumab and remdesivir in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a randomized clinical trial.” Intensive Care Med 47(11): 1258-1270.

Full text of this article.

PURPOSE: Trials of tocilizumab in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia have demonstrated mixed results, and the role of tocilizumab in combination with other treatments is uncertain. Here we evaluated whether tocilizumab plus remdesivir provides greater benefit than remdesivir alone in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial included patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 pneumonia requiring > 6 L/min supplemental oxygen. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg or placebo intravenously plus ≤ 10 days of remdesivir. The primary outcome was time from randomization to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” (defined as category 1, assessed by the investigator on a 7-category ordinal scale of clinical status) to day 28. Patients were followed for 60 days. RESULTS: Among 649 enrolled patients, 434 were randomly assigned to tocilizumab plus remdesivir and 215 to placebo plus remdesivir. 566 patients (88.2%) received corticosteroids during the trial to day 28. Median time from randomization to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” was 14 (95% CI 12-15) days with tocilizumab plus remdesivir and 14 (95% CI 11-16) days with placebo plus remdesivir [log-rank P = 0.74; Cox proportional hazards ratio 0.97 (95% CI 0.78-1.19)]. Serious adverse events occurred in 128 (29.8%) tocilizumab plus remdesivir and 72 (33.8%) placebo plus remdesivir patients; 78 (18.2%) and 42 (19.7%) patients, respectively, died by day 28. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab plus remdesivir did not shorten time to hospital discharge or “ready for discharge” to day 28 compared with placebo plus remdesivir in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

Dougan, M., A. Nirula, M. Azizad, B. Mocherla, R. L. Gottlieb, P. Chen, C. Hebert, R. Perry, J. Boscia, B. Heller, J. Morris, C. Crystal, A. Igbinadolor, G. Huhn, J. Cardona, I. Shawa, P. Kumar, A. C. Adams, J. Van Naarden, K. L. Custer, M. Durante, G. Oakley, A. E. Schade, T. R. Holzer, P. J. Ebert, R. E. Higgs, N. L. Kallewaard, J. Sabo, D. R. Patel, M. C. Dabora, P. Klekotka, L. Shen and D. M. Skovronsky (2021). “Bamlanivimab plus Etesevimab in Mild or Moderate Covid-19.” N Engl J Med 385(15): 1382-1392.

Full text of this article.

BACKGROUND: Patients with underlying medical conditions are at increased risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Whereas vaccine-derived immunity develops over time, neutralizing monoclonal-antibody treatment provides immediate, passive immunity and may limit disease progression and complications. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, a cohort of ambulatory patients with mild or moderate Covid-19 who were at high risk for progression to severe disease to receive a single intravenous infusion of either a neutralizing monoclonal-antibody combination agent (2800 mg of bamlanivimab and 2800 mg of etesevimab, administered together) or placebo within 3 days after a laboratory diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The primary outcome was the overall clinical status of the patients, defined as Covid-19-related hospitalization or death from any cause by day 29. RESULTS: A total of 1035 patients underwent randomization and received an infusion of bamlanivimab-etesevimab or placebo. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 53.8±16.8 years, and 52.0% were adolescent girls or women. By day 29, a total of 11 of 518 patients (2.1%) in the bamlanivimab-etesevimab group had a Covid-19-related hospitalization or death from any cause, as compared with 36 of 517 patients (7.0%) in the placebo group (absolute risk difference, -4.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.4 to -2.3; relative risk difference, 70%; P<0.001). No deaths occurred in the bamlanivimab-etesevimab group; in the placebo group, 10 deaths occurred, 9 of which were designated by the trial investigators as Covid-19-related. At day 7, a greater reduction from baseline in the log viral load was observed among patients who received bamlanivimab plus etesevimab than among those who received placebo (difference from placebo in the change from baseline, -1.20; 95% CI, -1.46 to -0.94; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk ambulatory patients, bamlanivimab plus etesevimab led to a lower incidence of Covid-19-related hospitalization and death than did placebo and accelerated the decline in the SARS-CoV-2 viral load. (Funded by Eli Lilly; BLAZE-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04427501.).