Research Spotlight

Posted February 15th 2017

Seventy Years of Polyethylene Glycols in Gastroenterology: The Journey of PEG 4000 and 3350 From Nonabsorbable Marker to Colonoscopy Preparation to Osmotic Laxative.

John Fordtran M.D.

John Fordtran M.D.

Fendler, T. J., M. E. Nassif, K. F. Kennedy, S. M. Joseph, S. C. Silvestry, G. A. Ewald, S. J. LaRue, J. M. Vader, J. A. Spertus and S. V. Arnold (2017). “Global outcome in patients with left ventricular assist devices.” Am J Cardiol: 2017 Jan [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve survival and quality of life (QOL) for most, but not all, patients with advanced heart failure. We described a broader definition of poor outcomes after LVAD, using a novel composite of death, QOL, and other major adverse events. We evaluated the frequency of poor global outcome at 1 year after LVAD among 164 patients (86% Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 to 2; shock or declining despite inotropes) at a high-volume center. Poor global outcome (comprising death, poor QOL [Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire <45], recurrent heart failure [>/=2 heart failure readmissions], or severe stroke) occurred in 58 patients (35%): 37 died, 17 had poor QOL, 3 had recurrent heart failure, and 1 had a severe stroke. Patients with poor global outcomes were more likely designated for destination therapy (46% vs 24%, p = 0.01), spent more days hospitalized per month alive (median [interquartile range] 18.6 [5.0 to 31.0] vs 3.7 [1.8 to 8.3], p <0.001), and had higher intracranial (12% vs 2%, p = 0.031) and gastrointestinal (44% vs 28%, p = 0.056) hemorrhage rates over the year after implant. Although LVADs often improve survival and QOL, approximately 1/3 of high-acuity patients experienced a poor global outcome over the year after LVAD. In conclusion, composite outcomes may better capture events that matter to patients with LVADs and thus support informed decisions about pursuing LVAD therapy.


Posted February 15th 2017

TRANSFORM (Multicenter Experience With Rapid Deployment Edwards INTUITY Valve System for Aortic Valve Replacement) US clinical trial: Performance of a rapid deployment aortic valve.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Michael J. Mack M.D.

Arsalan, M., J. J. Squiers, M. A. Herbert, J. C. MacHannaford, T. Chamogeorgakis, S. L. Prince, B. L. Hamman, C. Knoff, D. O. Moore, K. B. Harrington, J. M. DiMaio, M. J. Mack and W. T. Brinkman (2017). “Comparison of outcomes of operative therapy for acute type a aortic dissections provided at high-volume versus low-volume medical centers in north texas.” Am J Cardiol 119(2): 323-327.

Full text of this article.

Immediate surgery is standard therapy for acute type A aortic dissections (TAAD). Because of its low incidence, many smaller cardiac surgery programs do not routinely perform this procedure because it may negatively affect outcomes. Many high-risk, low-volume (LV) surgical procedures are now preferentially performed in reference centers. We compared the outcomes of surgery for TAAD in high-volume (HV) and LV centers in a single metropolitan area to determine the optimal setting for treatment. Thirty-five of the 37 cardiac surgery programs in the Dallas Ft. Worth metropolitan area participate in a regional consortium to measure outcomes collected in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. From January 01, 2008, to December 31, 2014, 29 programs had treated TAAD. Those programs performing at least 100 operations for TAAD were considered HV centers and the others LV. Surgery for TAAD was performed in 672 patients over the 7-year study period with HV centers performing 469 of 672 (70%) of the operations. Despite similar preoperative characteristics, operative mortality was significantly lower in HV versus LV centers (14.1% vs 24.1%; p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative paralysis rates (2.6% vs 4.5%; p = 0.196), stroke rates (10.7% vs 9.4%; p = 0.623), or 30-day readmission rates (12.1% vs 15.5%; p = 0.292). An improved survival rate in HV centers was maintained over a 5-year follow-up period. Surgery for TAAD in a single large metropolitan area was most commonly performed in HV centers. In conclusion, the treatment of acute thoracic aortic dissection is recommended to be performed in reference centers because of lower early and midterm mortality.


Posted February 15th 2017

Comparison of Outcomes of Operative Therapy for Acute Type A Aortic Dissections Provided at High-Volume Versus Low-Volume Medical Centers in North Texas.

William Brinkman M.D.

William Brinkman M.D.

Arsalan, M., J. J. Squiers, M. A. Herbert, J. C. MacHannaford, T. Chamogeorgakis, S. L. Prince, B. L. Hamman, C. Knoff, D. O. Moore, K. B. Harrington, J. M. DiMaio, M. J. Mack and W. T. Brinkman (2017). “Comparison of outcomes of operative therapy for acute type a aortic dissections provided at high-volume versus low-volume medical centers in north texas.” Am J Cardiol 119(2): 323-327.

Full text of this article.

Immediate surgery is standard therapy for acute type A aortic dissections (TAAD). Because of its low incidence, many smaller cardiac surgery programs do not routinely perform this procedure because it may negatively affect outcomes. Many high-risk, low-volume (LV) surgical procedures are now preferentially performed in reference centers. We compared the outcomes of surgery for TAAD in high-volume (HV) and LV centers in a single metropolitan area to determine the optimal setting for treatment. Thirty-five of the 37 cardiac surgery programs in the Dallas Ft. Worth metropolitan area participate in a regional consortium to measure outcomes collected in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Database. From January 01, 2008, to December 31, 2014, 29 programs had treated TAAD. Those programs performing at least 100 operations for TAAD were considered HV centers and the others LV. Surgery for TAAD was performed in 672 patients over the 7-year study period with HV centers performing 469 of 672 (70%) of the operations. Despite similar preoperative characteristics, operative mortality was significantly lower in HV versus LV centers (14.1% vs 24.1%; p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative paralysis rates (2.6% vs 4.5%; p = 0.196), stroke rates (10.7% vs 9.4%; p = 0.623), or 30-day readmission rates (12.1% vs 15.5%; p = 0.292). An improved survival rate in HV centers was maintained over a 5-year follow-up period. Surgery for TAAD in a single large metropolitan area was most commonly performed in HV centers. In conclusion, the treatment of acute thoracic aortic dissection is recommended to be performed in reference centers because of lower early and midterm mortality.


Posted February 15th 2017

From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation: Treatment targets for plaque psoriasis.

Alan M. Menter M.D.

Alan M. Menter M.D.

From the medical board of the national psoriasis foundation: Treatment targets for plaque psoriasis.” J Am Acad Dermatol 76(2): 290-298.

Full text of this article.

Prostate cancer screening by PSA testing remains controversial, particularly in the elderly. Practice guidelines from most clinical societies suggest discontinuing PSA screening at age 70 while the USPSTF recommends against screening at any age. Recent reports have demonstrated an increased incidence of metastatic prostate cancer, with men aged 75 or older accounting for roughly half of those newly diagnosed at an incurable stage. We herein describe the case of an elderly gentleman with no history of prostate cancer screening who presented with anorexia and back pain of unclear etiology. Evaluation with bone marrow aspiration revealed a diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer.


Posted February 15th 2017

Endovascular Technique for Repair of Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm After Coarctation Operation.

William Brinkman M.D.

William Brinkman M.D.

Banchereau, R., A. M. Cepika, J. Banchereau and V. Pascual (2017). “Understanding human autoimmunity and autoinflammation through transcriptomics.” Annu Rev Immunol: 2017 Jan [Epub ahead of print].

Full text of this article.

Transcriptomics, the high-throughput characterization of RNAs, has been instrumental in defining pathogenic signatures in human autoimmunity and autoinflammation. It enabled the identification of new therapeutic targets in IFN-, IL-1- and IL-17-mediated diseases. Applied to immunomonitoring, transcriptomics is starting to unravel diagnostic and prognostic signatures that stratify patients, track molecular changes associated with disease activity, define personalized treatment strategies, and generally inform clinical practice. Herein, we review the use of transcriptomics to define mechanistic, diagnostic, and predictive signatures in human autoimmunity and autoinflammation. We discuss some of the analytical approaches applied to extract biological knowledge from high-dimensional data sets. Finally, we touch upon emerging applications of transcriptomics to study eQTLs, B and T cell repertoire diversity, and isoform usage.